Individual differences in nonverbal number skills predict math anxiety

Math anxiety (MA) involves negative affect and tension when solving mathematical problems, with potentially life-long consequences. MA has been hypothesized to be a consequence of negative learning experiences and cognitive predispositions. Recent research indicates genetic and neurophysiological links, suggesting that MA stems from a basic level deficiency in symbolic numerical processing. However, the contribution of evolutionary ancient purely nonverbal processes is not fully understood. Here we show that the roots of MA may go beyond symbolic numbers. We demonstrate that MA is correlated with precision of the Approximate Number System (ANS). Individuals high in MA have poorer ANS functioning than those low in MA. This correlation remains significant when controlling for other forms of anxiety and for cognitive variables. We show that MA mediates the documented correlation between ANS precision and math performance, both with ANS and with math performance as independent variable in the mediation model. In light of our results, we discuss the possibility that MA has deep roots, stemming from a non-verbal number processing deficiency. The findings provide new evidence advancing the theoretical understanding of the developmental etiology of MA.

[1]  J. Leybaert,et al.  Symbolic Number Abilities Predict Later Approximate Number System Acuity in Preschool Children , 2014, PloS one.

[2]  M. Ashcraft,et al.  Mathematics Anxiety and the Affective Drop in Performance , 2009 .

[3]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Stable individual differences in number discrimination in infancy. , 2010, Developmental science.

[4]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  Numerical ordering ability mediates the relation between number-sense and arithmetic competence , 2011, Cognition.

[5]  F. Deane,et al.  Development of a Short Form of the Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI) , 2002, The Journal of general psychology.

[6]  Marcus Lindskog,et al.  Measuring acuity of the approximate number system reliably and validly: the evaluation of an adaptive test procedure , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[7]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  The effect of mathematics anxiety on the processing of numerical magnitude. , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  When Math Hurts: Math Anxiety Predicts Pain Network Activation in Anticipation of Doing Math , 2012, PloS one.

[9]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Developmental change in the acuity of the "Number Sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[10]  C. Spielberger,et al.  Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory , 1970 .

[11]  C. Artemenko,et al.  Neural correlates of math anxiety – an overview and implications , 2015, Frontiers in Psychology.

[12]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Nonsymbolic number and cumulative area representations contribute shared and unique variance to symbolic math competence , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Improving arithmetic performance with number sense training: An investigation of underlying mechanism , 2014, Cognition.

[14]  D. Hopko.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis Of The Math Anxiety Rating Scale–Revised , 2003 .

[15]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[16]  Marcus Lindskog,et al.  The association between higher education and approximate number system acuity , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[17]  Ariel Starr,et al.  Number sense in infancy predicts mathematical abilities in childhood , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Vinod Menon,et al.  The Neurodevelopmental Basis of Math Anxiety , 2012, Psychological science.

[19]  J. Raven,et al.  Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales , 1962 .

[20]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Mathematics anxiety affects counting but not subitizing during visual enumeration , 2010, Cognition.

[21]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Impaired acuity of the approximate number system underlies mathematical learning disability (dyscalculia). , 2011, Child development.

[22]  R. M. Suinn,et al.  The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale: Psychometric data , 1972 .

[23]  D. Ansari,et al.  Trajectories of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude Processing in the First Year of Formal Schooling , 2016, PloS one.

[24]  Mark H. Ashcraft,et al.  Mathematics anxiety and mental arithmetic performance: An exploratory investigation , 1994 .

[25]  Ray Hembree,et al.  The Nature, Effects, and Relief of Mathematics Anxiety. , 1990 .

[26]  Jacqueline Leybaert,et al.  Does math education modify the approximate number system? A comparison of schooled and unschooled adults , 2013, Trends in Neuroscience and Education.

[27]  Ana Carolina Monnerat Fioravanti-Bastos,et al.  Development and validation of a short-form version of the Brazilian state-trait anxiety inventory , 2011 .

[28]  M. I. Núñez-Peña,et al.  Less precise representation of numerical magnitude in high math-anxious individuals: An ERP study of the size and distance effects , 2014, Biological Psychology.

[29]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Training the Approximate Number System Improves Math Proficiency , 2013, Psychological science.

[30]  Andrea Facoetti,et al.  Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia , 2010, Cognition.

[31]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Nonsymbolic numerical magnitude comparison: reliability and validity of different task variants and outcome measures, and their relationship to arithmetic achievement in adults. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[32]  Marcus Lindskog,et al.  Arithmetic Training Does Not Improve Approximate Number System Acuity , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[33]  M. Ashcraft.  Math Anxiety: Personal, Educational, and Cognitive Consequences , 2002 .

[34]  Qixuan Chen,et al.  Association between individual differences in non-symbolic number acuity and math performance: a meta-analysis. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[35]  David Barner,et al.  Intensive Math Training Does not Affect Approximate Number Acuity: Evidence From a Three-Year Longitudinal Curriculum Intervention , 2016, J. Numer. Cogn..

[36]  Titia Gebuis,et al.  False Approximations of the Approximate Number System? , 2011, PloS one.

[37]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  The role of expressive writing in math anxiety. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[38]  Neil Marlow,et al.  Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control, Not Non-Verbal Number Acuity, Correlate with Mathematics Achievement , 2013, PloS one.

[39]  S. Dehaene.  Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[40]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Individual differences in framing and conjunction effects , 1998 .

[41]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Symbolic arithmetic knowledge without instruction , 2007, Nature.

[43]  Lei Wang,et al.  Enabling Delay of Gratification Behavior in Those Not So Predisposed: The Moderating Role of Social Support , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[44]  Matthew Inglis,et al.  Indexing the approximate number system. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[45]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Preverbal and verbal counting and computation , 1992, Cognition.

[46]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[47]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[48]  Robert Plomin,et al.  Who is afraid of math? Two sources of genetic variance for mathematical anxiety. , 2014, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[49]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[50]  M. Eysenck,et al.  Anxiety and Performance: The Processing Efficiency Theory , 1992 .