QAM classification methods by SVM machine learning for improved optical interconnection

Abstract High-order quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) formats are very effective for increasing the transmission capacity due to the highly increased spectral efficiency. However, the signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) hungry and dense constellation of QAM make it very sensitive to nonlinear distortion. The nonlinear decision boundary adaptively generated by machine learning method of support vector machine (SVM) can be effectively used for the classification of the symbols. The different classification methods have different performance in terms of classification complexity. We experimentally investigated five SVM multi-classification methods for machine learning assisted adaptive nonlinear mitigation, including the one versus rest (OvR), the symbol encoding (SE), the binary encoding (BE), the constellation rows and columns (RC), and the in-phase and quadrature components (IQC). The comprehensive results with comparisons are demonstrated, indicating significant nonlinear mitigation with BER reductions. The SVM multi-classifier based on the in-phase and quadrature components is relatively optimal, considering the calculation and storage.

[1]  Mingyi Gao,et al.  Performance improvement of 64-QAM coherent optical communication system by optimizing symbol decision boundary based on support vector machine , 2018 .

[2]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[3]  Soo-Young Lee,et al.  Support Vector Machines with Binary Tree Architecture for Multi-Class Classification , 2004 .

[4]  Li Zhang,et al.  Decision Tree Support Vector Machine , 2007, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[5]  Polina Bayvel,et al.  Characterization of long-haul 112Gbit/s PDM-QAM-16 transmission with and without digital nonlinearity compensation. , 2010, Optics express.

[6]  B. Eggleton,et al.  Comparison of DSP-based nonlinear equalizers for intra-channel nonlinearity compensation in coherent optical OFDM. , 2016, Optics letters.

[7]  S. Kumar,et al.  Analysis of Nonlinear Phase Noise in Coherent Fiber-Optic Systems Based on Phase Shift Keying , 2009, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[8]  Lin Sun,et al.  Nonlinear Distortion Mitigation by Machine Learning of SVM Classification for PAM-4 and PAM-8 Modulated Optical Interconnection , 2018, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[9]  Jie Yang,et al.  An SVM-Based Detection for Coherent Optical APSK Systems With Nonlinear Phase Noise , 2014, IEEE Photonics Journal.

[10]  H. M. V. R. Herath,et al.  Effect of Nonlinear Phase Noise on the Performance of $M$-Ary PSK Signals in Optical Fiber Links , 2013, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[11]  F. Hauske,et al.  Intrachannel Nonlinearity Compensation by Inverse Volterra Series Transfer Function , 2012, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[12]  Zabih Ghassemlooy,et al.  Artificial Neural Network Nonlinear Equalizer for Coherent Optical OFDM , 2015, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[13]  B. Fei,et al.  Binary tree of SVM: a new fast multiclass training and classification algorithm , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[14]  Sridha Sridharan,et al.  Activity recognition using binary tree SVM , 2014, 2014 IEEE Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing (SSP).

[15]  Lin Sun,et al.  Machine Learning Adaptive Receiver for PAM-4 Modulated Optical Interconnection Based on Silicon Microring Modulator , 2018, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[16]  J. Gordon,et al.  Phase noise in photonic communications systems using linear amplifiers. , 1990, Optics letters.

[17]  Lin Sun,et al.  Multiband Three-Dimensional Carrierless Amplitude Phase Modulation for Short Reach Optical Communications , 2016, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[18]  Marc Wuilpart,et al.  Fiber Nonlinearity Equalizer Based on Support Vector Classification for Coherent Optical OFDM , 2016, IEEE Photonics Journal.