The impact of clients’ decision-making on their adoption of industrialized building

Previous research has shown that client organizations’ decision-making about new-build creates individual-level and organizational-level barriers to the adoption of Swedish industrialized building (IB). However, it has been proposed that clients may overcome barriers on both levels by allowing multiple meanings and conflicting interpretations to surface and interact with their decision-making. The aim is to test this proposition. Based on the theoretical fields of decision-making and organizational information processing, a framework for analysis has been developed. In the framework, three decision-making approaches are operationalized: rational, judgments and managing multiple meanings. Data were collected using in-depth interviews with key decision-makers from four Swedish professional clients differing on when and if they adopted IB: one early-adopter, two late-adopters and one non-adopter. The empirical findings support the proposition and show a relationship between how clients manage multiple meanings in their decision-making and their adoption of IB. The research adds to the understanding of how clients may overcome barriers to the adoption of IB on both individual and organizational levels. Moreover, it increases understanding about how clients might better cope with radical changes and innovations.

[1]  F. Phua.  Construction management research at the individual level of analysis: current status, gaps and future directions , 2013 .

[2]  Thomas A. Schwandt.  Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook , 1996 .

[3]  Joakim Wincent,et al.  Beyond Managing Uncertainty: Insights From Studying Equivocality in the Fuzzy Front End of Product and Process Innovation Projects , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[4]  Karen Manley,et al.  The innovation competence of repeat public sector clients in the Australian construction industry , 2006 .

[5]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Ambiguity and choice in organizations , 1976 .

[6]  Erika Hedgren.  Overcoming organizational lock-in in decision-making : Construction clients facing innovation , 2013 .

[7]  Karen Manley,et al.  Key influences on construction innovation , 2004 .

[8]  Chris Ivory,et al.  The cult of customer responsiveness: is design innovation the price of a client‐focused construction industry? , 2005 .

[9]  R. Daft,et al.  Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems , 1984 .

[10]  David Gann,et al.  Construction as a manufacturing process? Similarities and differences between industrialized housing and car production in Japan , 1996 .

[11]  Gary David Holt,et al.  Contractor selection innovation: examination of two decades' published research , 2010 .

[12]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[13]  M. Augier,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision‐Making Processes in Administrative Organizations , 2002 .

[14]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[15]  Gregory M. Rose,et al.  Achieving adaptive ends through equivocality: A study of organizational antecedents and consequences , 2007 .

[16]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[17]  Paul Goodwin,et al.  Decision Analysis for Management Judgment , 1998 .

[18]  E. Sarah Slaughter,et al.  Models of Construction Innovation , 1998 .

[19]  R. Hogarth,et al.  BEHAVIORAL DECISION THEORY: PROCESSES OF JUDGMENT AND CHOICE , 1981 .

[20]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[21]  D. Schweiger,et al.  Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus , 1986 .

[22]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[23]  R. Daft,et al.  A Tentative Exploration into the Amount and Equivocality of Information Processing in Organizational Work Units. , 1981 .

[24]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Essentials of Organization Theory and Design , 2000 .

[25]  Lars Stehn,et al.  Construction clients’ ability to manage uncertainty and equivocality , 2011 .

[26]  James W. Fredrickson,et al.  Inertia And Creeping Rationality In Strategic Decision Processes , 1989 .

[27]  Charles R. Schwenk.  THE COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE ON STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING , 1988 .

[28]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[29]  Malena Ingemansson,et al.  Industrial renewal within the construction network , 2013 .

[30]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Fast and frugal heuristics: The tools of bounded rationality , 2004 .

[31]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[32]  James G. March,et al.  A primer on decision making : how decisions happen , 1994 .

[33]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[34]  Andreas Hartmann,et al.  Factors constituting the innovation adoption environment of public clients , 2008 .

[35]  Chris I. Goodier,et al.  House-Building Business Models and Off-Site Construction Take-Up , 2012 .

[36]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[37]  Erika Levander,et al.  Clients as drivers of innovation : lessons from industrialised construction in Sweden , 2010 .

[38]  Anders Roos,et al.  Development of timber framed firms in the construction sector - Is EU policy one source of their innovation? , 2010 .

[39]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[40]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[41]  Alistair G.F. Gibb,et al.  Standardization and pre-assembly- distinguishing myth from reality using case study research , 2001 .

[42]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[43]  P. Barr,et al.  Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal , 1992 .

[44]  Susanne Engström,et al.  Sustaining inertia?: Construction clients' decision‐making and information‐processing approach to industrialized building innovations , 2012 .

[45]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[46]  Martin Sexton,et al.  A literature synthesis of innovation in small construction firms: insights, ambiguities and questions , 2003 .

[47]  Adva Dinur.  Common and un‐common sense in managerial decision making under task uncertainty , 2011 .

[48]  A. Dainty.  Methodological pluralism in construction management research , 2008 .

[49]  Ezekiel Chinyio,et al.  Understanding the construction client , 2006 .

[50]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Multi-storey timber buildings: breaking industry path dependency , 2008 .

[51]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[52]  C Leake,et al.  Decision Analysis for Management Judgement (2nd Edn) , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[53]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[54]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[55]  Brian Finnimore,et al.  Houses from the factory : system building and the welfare state 1942-74 , 1989 .