Using continuous assessment to promote student engagement in a large class

The authors have developed a first-year fluids course for a class of around 230 aerospace, civil and mechanical engineering students. This paper aims to show how the teaching and assessment methodology was applied to the challenge of a large class. The lectures featured formal teaching interspersed with active learning elements. Smaller group (about 25–30 students) tutorial classes involved student practice. A 10-minute test occurred in each tutorial during weeks 3–11. Each test was based on the previous week's lecture material and the marks contributed towards 20% of the course mark. A condition for passing the course was that a student must pass at least six of the nine tests. The assessment promoted student involvement with the course – tutorial attendance was greater and more uniform than previously and exam performance improved significantly. Students recognised that the assessment system was useful in encouraging continuous learning over the semester and building confidence.

[1]  Janet Mancini Billson,et al.  Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research , 1989 .

[2]  David Kember,et al.  An examination of the interrelationships between workload, study time, learning approaches and academic outcomes , 1996 .

[3]  A. Chickering,et al.  Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education , 1987, CORE.

[4]  M. Russell,et al.  Evaluating the Weekly-Assessed Tutorial Sheet approach to assessment: background, pedagogy and impact , 2005 .

[5]  Lynn McAlpine,et al.  Designing Learning as Well as Teaching , 2004 .

[6]  John N. Gardner,et al.  Challenging and Supporting the First-Year Student: A Handbook for Improving the First Year of College. , 2004 .

[7]  Michael C. Rodriguez,et al.  A Review of Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Guidelines for Classroom Assessment , 2002 .

[8]  R. Coe,et al.  It's the Effect Size, Stupid What effect size is and why it is important , 2012 .

[9]  D. Rowntree Assessing Students: How Shall We Know Them? , 1977 .

[10]  Estela Lopez,et al.  McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers (review) , 2003 .

[11]  John Davies,et al.  Feedback through student essay competitions: what makes a good engineering lecturer? , 2009 .

[12]  Bruce Macfarlane,et al.  The ‘Thatcherite’ generation and university degree results , 1992 .

[13]  Phil Race,et al.  The Lecturer's Toolkit , 2006 .

[14]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How college affects students , 1991 .

[15]  Kimberly C. Thornbury How College Affects Students: Volume 2 A Third Decade of Research , 2006 .

[16]  H. Sluiter [Learning by doing]. , 1977, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[17]  David Nicol,et al.  Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers , 1994 .

[18]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom‐Based Practices , 2005 .

[19]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments , 1990 .