Characteristics of the convergent angles of tapered implants based on a premolar root model.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Developing tapered implants with the most appropriate angular characteristics requires an improved analysis of the anatomy of premolar roots. PURPOSE The purpose of this observational study was to analyze the 3D anatomy of premolar roots by determining the tapered slope and convergent angle (TS/CA), to transform the TS/CA patterns into those in which the tapered implants mimic natural tooth roots, and to provide TS/CA references for future investigations. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 73 human single-rooted premolars were surveyed and analyzed by microcomputed tomography and an associated software program. The 3D root surface area (RSA), the radius/diameter (R/D) at the planned first to tenth millimeter levels apical to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), and the TS/CA at corresponding levels were calculated. The results were statistically analyzed by using an independent samples t test to assess the general differences of tested parameters between maxillary and mandibular premolars. A paired t test was used to examine the significant intragroup TS/CA differences between sequential coronoapical levels. One-way ANOVA was applied to study the general significance of developmental patterns in maxillary and/or mandibular groups. Two-way ANOVA was used to inspect the TS/CA significance at various measurements coronoapically between the maxillary and mandibular premolars (α=.05). RESULTS Generally, the RSA, root length, R/D, and TS/CA parameters examined for the maxillary premolar roots differed significantly from those for the mandibular roots at the evaluated levels (P<.05). According to the measurements, the maxillary premolar roots generally exhibited nonsignificant RSA and R/D reduction patterns, with a decreasing angle of TS=13.44 degrees and CA=24.53 degrees coronoapically. However, mandibular premolar roots exhibited a significant reduction pattern, with TS=11.25 degrees and CA=21.06 degrees coronoapically according to both individual and general evaluations. CONCLUSIONS Based on the developmental patterns of the evaluated TSs/CAs, tapered implants imitating premolar root anatomy should have a conical rather than a cylindrical shape, and the R/D of these models should be reduced to half at the apical third. However, further studies are warranted to identify more TS/CA characteristics related to the tapered implants, including the TSs/CAs of other tooth types.

[2]  Jong-Ho Lee,et al.  The influence of thread geometry on implant osseointegration under immediate loading: a literature review , 2014, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[3]  B. Pippenger,et al.  Integrative Performance Analysis of a Novel Bone Level Tapered Implant , 2016, Advances in dental research.

[4]  P Missika,et al.  Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[5]  James Laney Williams,et al.  Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[6]  M. Atieh,et al.  Stability of tapered and parallel‐walled dental implants: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2018, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[7]  J. Gaughan,et al.  Effect of implant design on initial stability of tapered implants. , 2009, The Journal of oral implantology.

[8]  F. Faot,et al.  Comparison between tapered and cylindrical implants in the posterior regions of the mandible: A prospective, randomized, split‐mouth clinical trial focusing on implant stability changes during early healing , 2017, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[9]  Beatriz Paniagua,et al.  Three-dimensional characterization of root morphology for maxillary incisors , 2017, PloS one.

[10]  D Siegele,et al.  Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. , 1989, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[11]  M. Norton,et al.  Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro- and microstructure. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[12]  Yi-Fang Huang,et al.  Correction: Incompatible amount of 3-D and 2-D periodontal attachments on micro-CT scanned premolars , 2018, PloS one.

[13]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Reasons for failures of oral implants. , 2014, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[14]  R. Jung,et al.  Group 1 ITI Consensus Report: The influence of implant length and design and medications on clinical and patient-reported outcomes. , 2018, Clinical oral implants research.

[15]  A. Jokstad,et al.  Systematic review of clinical and patient‐reported outcomes following oral rehabilitation on dental implants with a tapered compared to a non‐tapered implant design , 2018, Clinical oral implants research.

[16]  Josep Cabratosa-Termes,et al.  Effect of implant design in immediate loading. A randomized, controlled, split-mouth, prospective clinical trial. , 2015, Clinical oral implants research.

[17]  M. Atieh,et al.  Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis. , 2013, The Journal of oral implantology.

[18]  H. Kwon,et al.  The effect of various thread designs on the initial stability of taper implants , 2009, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[19]  M. Neves,et al.  Tapered implants: from indications to advantages. , 2009, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[20]  Lars Sennerby,et al.  Influence of implant taper on the primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implants. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[21]  F. Alshehri,et al.  Influence of Implant Shape (Tapered vs Cylindrical) on the Survival of Dental Implants Placed in the Posterior Maxilla: A Systematic Review , 2016, Implant dentistry.

[22]  J. Shibli,et al.  Influence of Implant Design (Cylindrical and Conical) in the Load Transfer Surrounding Long (13mm) and Short (7mm) Length Implants: A Photoelastic Analysis , 2016, The open dentistry journal.

[23]  K. Koyano,et al.  A stepwise under-prepared osteotomy technique improves primary stability in shallow-placed implants: a preliminary study for simultaneous vertical ridge augmentation , 2018, Odontology.

[24]  M. Dard,et al.  Tapered Implants in Dentistry , 2016, Advances in dental research.