Integrated application of uniform design and least-squares support vector machines to transfection optimization

BackgroundTransfection in mammalian cells based on liposome presents great challenge for biological professionals. To protect themselves from exogenous insults, mammalian cells tend to manifest poor transfection efficiency. In order to gain high efficiency, we have to optimize several conditions of transfection, such as amount of liposome, amount of plasmid, and cell density at transfection. However, this process may be time-consuming and energy-consuming. Fortunately, several mathematical methods, developed in the past decades, may facilitate the resolution of this issue. This study investigates the possibility of optimizing transfection efficiency by using a method referred to as least-squares support vector machine, which requires only a few experiments and maintains fairly high accuracy.ResultsA protocol consists of 15 experiments was performed according to the principle of uniform design. In this protocol, amount of liposome, amount of plasmid, and the number of seeded cells 24 h before transfection were set as independent variables and transfection efficiency was set as dependent variable. A model was deduced from independent variables and their respective dependent variable. Another protocol made up by 10 experiments was performed to test the accuracy of the model. The model manifested a high accuracy. Compared to traditional method, the integrated application of uniform design and least-squares support vector machine greatly reduced the number of required experiments. What's more, higher transfection efficiency was achieved.ConclusionThe integrated application of uniform design and least-squares support vector machine is a simple technique for obtaining high transfection efficiency. Using this novel method, the number of required experiments would be greatly cut down while higher efficiency would be gained. Least-squares support vector machine may be applicable to many other problems that need to be optimized.

[1]  Samy Bengio,et al.  SVMTorch: Support Vector Machines for Large-Scale Regression Problems , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[2]  Saman K. Halgamuge,et al.  Fast splice site detection using information content and feature reduction , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[3]  Wen-Lian Hsu,et al.  Predicting RNA-binding sites of proteins using support vector machines and evolutionary information , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[4]  Xiuzhen Zhang,et al.  Large-scale prediction of long disordered regions in proteins using random forests , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[5]  Antanas Verikas,et al.  Using the patient's questionnaire data to screen laryngeal disorders , 2009, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[6]  Yanzhi Guo,et al.  Using support vector machine combined with auto covariance to predict protein–protein interactions from protein sequences , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  J. Northrop,et al.  Lipofection: a highly efficient, lipid-mediated DNA-transfection procedure. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Vladimir Naumovich Vapni.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 1995 .

[9]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[10]  Y. Vander Heyden,et al.  Sequential uniform designs for fingerprints development of Ginkgo biloba extracts by capillary electrophoresis. , 2006, Journal of chromatography. A.

[11]  M. Stone.  Cross‐Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions , 1976 .

[12]  J. Yun,et al.  Optimization of submerged‐culture conditions for mycelial growth and exo‐biopolymer production by Auricularia polytricha (wood ears fungus) using the methods of uniform design and regression analysis , 2003, Biotechnology and applied biochemistry.

[13]  Johan A. K. Suykens,et al.  Least Squares Support Vector Machine Classifiers , 1999, Neural Processing Letters.

[14]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[15]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  An overview of statistical learning theory , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[16]  Yunqian Ma,et al.  Practical selection of SVM parameters and noise estimation for SVM regression , 2004, Neural Networks.

[17]  Yong Zhang,et al.  CPC: assess the protein-coding potential of transcripts using sequence features and support vector machine , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  Folker Meyer,et al.  GISMO—gene identification using a support vector machine for ORF classification , 2006, Nucleic acids research.