Global Facilitation of Attended Features Is Obligatory and Restricts Divided Attention

In many common situations such as driving an automobile it is advantageous to attend concurrently to events at different locations (e.g., the car in front, the pedestrian to the side). While spatial attention can be divided effectively between separate locations, studies investigating attention to nonspatial features have often reported a “global effect”, whereby items having the attended feature may be preferentially processed throughout the entire visual field. These findings suggest that spatial and feature-based attention may at times act in direct opposition: spatially divided foci of attention cannot be truly independent if feature attention is spatially global and thereby affects all foci equally. In two experiments, human observers attended concurrently to one of two overlapping fields of dots of different colors presented in both the left and right visual fields. When the same color or two different colors were attended on the two sides, deviant targets were detected accurately, and visual-cortical potentials elicited by attended dots were enhanced. However, when the attended color on one side matched the ignored color on the opposite side, attentional modulation of cortical potentials was abolished. This loss of feature selectivity could be attributed to enhanced processing of unattended items that shared the color of the attended items in the opposite field. Thus, while it is possible to attend to two different colors at the same time, this ability is fundamentally constrained by spatially global feature enhancement in early visual-cortical areas, which is obligatory and persists even when it explicitly conflicts with task demands.

[1]  G. Boynton,et al.  Feature-Based Attentional Modulations in the Absence of Direct Visual Stimulation , 2007, Neuron.

[2]  R Kakigi,et al.  [Event-related brain potentials]. , 1997, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[3]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to the color and direction of moving stimuli: Electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical feature selection , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  R. M. Boynton,et al.  Comparison of four methods of heterochromatic photometry. , 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[5]  S. Treue,et al.  Feature-Based Attention Increases the Selectivity of Population Responses in Primate Visual Cortex , 2004, Current Biology.

[6]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[9]  H. Pashler,et al.  Evidence for split attentional foci. , 2000, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[10]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Electrophysiology of Cognition , 2011 .

[11]  Laurent Itti,et al.  Perceptual consequences of feature-based attention. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[12]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global feature-based attention for motion and color , 2003, Vision Research.

[13]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Color-selective attention need not be mediated by spatial attention. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[14]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Event-related brain potentials. , 1990 .

[15]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Vertex potentials evoked during auditory signal detection: Relation to decision criteria , 1973 .

[16]  Ming Bo Cai,et al.  A neural model for temporal order judgments and their active recalibration: a common mechanism for space and time? , 2010 .

[17]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Robert Desimone,et al.  Feature-Based Attention in the Frontal Eye Field and Area V4 during Visual Search , 2011, Neuron.

[19]  J. Braun,et al.  Does feature similarity facilitate attentional selection? , 2010 .

[20]  S. A. Hillyard,et al.  Sustained division of the attentional spotlight , 2003, Nature.

[21]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Tracking the allocation of attention in visual scenes with steady-state evoked potentials , 2011 .

[23]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[24]  C. Bundesen,et al.  A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. , 2005, Psychological review.

[25]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Feature-based attention in visual cortex , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[26]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Effects of Feature-selective and Spatial Attention at Different Stages of Visual Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  S. Luck,et al.  Feature-based attention modulates feedforward visual processing , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  Á. Kristjánsson Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task , 2006, Vision Research.

[29]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Steady-State VEP and Attentional Visual Processing , 2003 .

[30]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Attention Facilitates Multiple Stimulus Features in Parallel in Human Visual Cortex , 2008, Current Biology.

[31]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[33]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[35]  Alex O. Holcombe,et al.  Feature-based attentional interference revealed in perceptual errors and lags , 2012, Vision Research.

[36]  T. Wickens Elementary Signal Detection Theory , 2001 .

[37]  H J Müller,et al.  Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  D. Melcher,et al.  Implicit Attentional Selection of Bound Visual Features , 2005, Neuron.

[39]  Jasna Martinovic,et al.  Bottom-Up Biases in Feature-Selective Attention , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Carsten Nicolas Boehler,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial- and feature-based attention: A quantitative analysis , 2007, Brain Research.

[41]  C. N. Boehler,et al.  Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Feature-Based Attention Spread: Evidence from Combined Electroencephalographic and Magnetoencephalographic Recordings , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  J. Gallant,et al.  Combined effects of spatial and feature-based attention on responses of V4 neurons , 2009, Vision Research.

[43]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[44]  J. Braun,et al.  Does feature similarity facilitate attentional selection? , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[45]  Christian M. Stoppel,et al.  Separable Mechanisms Underlying Global Feature-Based Attention , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  H. Pashler,et al.  Evidence for split attentional foci. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady-state visual evoked potential. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.