A dual-task paradigm to study the interference reduction in the Simon task.

Analyzing RT distributions in the Simon task reveals that congruency effects decrease for the longest RTs. Four experiments were carried out to examine whether this decrease of the congruency effect with response speed was under a top-down control or due to bottom-up mechanisms. We specifically manipulated the availability of attentional resources by requiring participants to perform a Simon task concurrently to different secondary tasks. RT distribution analysis (in particular delta functions) was performed under both single-task and dual-task conditions. Results show that the reduction of the interference effect with time could be affected when the Simon task was performed concurrently with a secondary task. Nonetheless, the type of the secondary task seems to be a critical factor. Therefore, the data suggest that the mechanisms responsible for the reduction of the interference effect with time are under some attentional control but the exact nature of these mechanisms remains to be explored.

[1]  K Richard Ridderinkhof,et al.  Delta plots in the study of individual differences: new tools reveal response inhibition deficits in AD/Hd that are eliminated by methylphenidate treatment. , 2005, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[2]  F. Vidal,et al.  Programming response duration in a precueing reaction time paradigm. , 1991, Journal of motor behavior.

[3]  F. Macar,et al.  Effects of attention manipulation on judgments of duration and of intensity in the visual modality , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[4]  B. Hommel.  Spontaneous decay of response-code activation , 1994, Psychological research.

[5]  Scott W. Brown.  Attentional resources in timing: Interference effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Eliot Hazeltine,et al.  Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Jennifer M. Glass,et al.  Virtually Perfect Time Sharing in Dual-Task Performance: Uncorking the Central Cognitive Bottleneck , 2001, Psychological science.

[8]  J. Müsseler,et al.  Processing of irrelevant location information under dual-task conditions , 2006, Psychological research.

[9]  R. Hübner,et al.  Evidence for strategic suppression of irrelevant activation in the Simon task. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[10]  B. Hommel.  The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[11]  C D Wickens,et al.  Compatibility and Resource Competition between Modalities of Input, Central Processing, and Output , 1983, Human factors.

[12]  R W Proctor,et al.  Referential coding and attention-shifting accounts of the Simon effect , 1994, Psychological research.

[13]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention , 1990 .

[14]  J. Müsseler,et al.  Testing the boundary conditions for processing irrelevant location information: The cross-task Simon effect , 2005 .

[15]  Borís Burle,et al.  Executive control in the Simon effect: an electromyographic and distributional analysis , 2002, Psychological research.

[16]  Wolf Schwarz,et al.  Response time models of delta plots with negative-going slopes , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[17]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. , 2002 .

[18]  Borís Burle,et al.  Dynamics of facilitation and interference in cue-priming and Simon tasks , 2005 .

[19]  R. E. Hicks,et al.  Concurrent processing demands and the experience of time-in-passing , 1977 .

[20]  F. Macar,et al.  Controlled attention sharing influences time estimation , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[21]  H Pashler,et al.  Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. , 2007, Psychological review.

[23]  B Burle,et al.  Dissociation between activation and attention effects in time estimation: implications for internal clock models. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Ewart A. C. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive processing and time perception , 1975 .

[25]  S Kornblum,et al.  The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli , 1994, Psychological research.

[26]  Huifang Wang,et al.  Activation of response codes by relevant and irrelevant stimulus information , 1995 .

[27]  S. B. Vincent.  The function of the vibrissae in the behavior of the white rat , 1912 .

[28]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Subthalamic nucleus stimulation influences expression and suppression of impulsive behaviour in Parkinson's disease. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  Richard Ridderinkhof.  Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: activation and suppression in conflict tasks , 2002, Psychological research.

[30]  R. Ratcliff.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  E. Lauber,et al.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[33]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Structure of Attentional Resources , 1980 .

[34]  A. Hedge,et al.  The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response-time. , 1975, Acta psychologica.

[35]  P. Hancock,et al.  How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[36]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  On the relation between the mean and the variance of a diffusion model response time distribution , 2005 .

[38]  D. Navon,et al.  Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[40]  J. R. Simon.  The Effects of an Irrelevant Directional CUE on Human Information Processing , 1990 .

[41]  E. Soetens,et al.  Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  R. Remington,et al.  The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.