Cues to perception of reduced flaps.

Natural, spontaneous speech (and even quite careful speech) often shows extreme reduction in many speech segments, even resulting in apparent deletion of consonants. Where the flap ([inverted J]) allophone of /t/ and /d/ is expected in American English, one frequently sees an approximant-like or even vocalic pattern, rather than a clear flap. Still, the /t/ or /d/ is usually perceived, suggesting the acoustic characteristics of a reduced flap are sufficient for perception of a consonant. This paper identifies several acoustic characteristics of reduced flaps based on previous acoustic research (size of intensity dip, consonant duration, and F4 valley) and presents phonetic identification data for continua that manipulate these acoustic characteristics of reduction. The results indicate that the most obvious types of acoustic variability seen in natural flaps do affect listeners' percept of a consonant, but not sufficiently to completely account for the percept. Listeners are affected by the acoustic characteristics of consonant reduction, but they are also very skilled at evaluating variability along the acoustic dimensions that realize reduction.

[1]  Minjung Son.  Pitfalls of spectrogram readings of flaps , 2008 .

[2]  L. Raphael.  Acoustic Cues to the Perception of Segmental Phonemes , 2008, The Handbook of Speech Perception.

[3]  C. Espy-Wilson,et al.  Acoustic cues of ‘‘retroflex’’ and ‘‘bunched’’ American English rhotic sound , 2007 .

[4]  Benjamin V. Tucker,et al.  Fourth formant dip as a correlate of American English flaps , 2007 .

[5]  A. Cutler,et al.  Formant transitions in fricative identification: the role of native fricative inventory. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Paul A Luce,et al.  Representation of lexical form: evidence from studies of sublexical ambiguity. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  N. Warner.  Reduction of flaps: Speech style, phonological environment, and variability , 2005 .

[9]  Dani Byrd,et al.  An articulatory examination of word-final flapping at phrase edges and interiors , 2005, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[10]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Articulatory Planning Is Continuous and Sensitive to Informational Redundancy , 2005, Phonetica.

[11]  Cynthia M Connine,et al.  It’s not what you hear but how often you hear it: On the neglected role of phonological variant frequency in auditory word recognition , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Paul A Luce,et al.  Representation of lexical form. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Y. Tohkura,et al.  A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes , 2003, Cognition.

[14]  Sahyang Kim,et al.  An articulatory and acoustic study of Pima coronals , 2002 .

[15]  R. Schreuder,et al.  The Recognition of Reduced Word Forms , 2002, Brain and Language.

[16]  Steven Greenberg,et al.  Speaking in shorthand - A syllable-centric perspective for understanding pronunciation variation , 1999, Speech Commun..

[17]  Kenneth de Jong,et al.  Stress-related variation in the articulation of coda alveolar stops: flapping revisited , 1998 .

[18]  Abeer Alwan,et al.  Acoustic modelling of American English /r/ , 1997, EUROSPEECH.

[19]  W. Strange,et al.  Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants , 1992 .

[20]  R. Shillcock,et al.  The recognition of words after their acoustic offsets in spontaneous speech: Effects of subsequent context , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Bruno H. Repp,et al.  Trading relations among acoustic cues in speech perception are largely a result of phonetic categorization , 1983, Speech Commun..

[22]  V. Zue,et al.  Acoustic study of medial /t,d/ in American English , 1979 .

[23]  Benjamin V. Tucker.  Spoken Word Recognition of the Reduced American English Flap , 2007 .

[24]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Listeners recover /t/s that speakers reduce: Evidence from /t/-lenition in Dutch , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[25]  Keith Johnson.  Massive reduction in conversational American English , 2004 .

[26]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[27]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[28]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Acoustic modeling of American English , 2000 .

[29]  Takayuki Arai,et al.  A CASE STUDY OF SPONTANEOUS SPEECH IN JAPANESE , 1999 .

[30]  J. Horna.  An investigation into the acoustics of American English flaps, with a secondary emphasis on Spanish flaps, in fluent speech , 1998 .

[31]  Steven Greenberg,et al.  ON THE ORIGINS OF SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY IN THE REAL WORLD , 1997 .

[32]  Koopmans-Van Beinum,et al.  Vowel contrast reduction : an acoustic and perceptual study of Dutch vowels in various speech conditions , 1980 .

[33]  Robert F. Port,et al.  The influence of tempo on stop closure duration as a cue for voicing and place , 1979 .

[34]  W. M. Fischer,et al.  Intervocalic Flapping in English , 1976 .