Molecular visualization in chemistry education: The role of multidisciplinary collaboration

Visualization tools and high performance computing have changed the nature of chemistry research and have the promise to transform chemistry instruction. However, the images central to chemistry research can pose difficulties for beginning chemistry students. In order for molecular visualization tools to be useful in education, students must be able to interpret the images they produce. Cognitive scientists can provide valuable insight into how novices perceive and ascribe meaning to molecular visualizations. Further insights from educators, computer scientists and developers, and graphic artists are important for chemistry educators who want to help students learn with molecular visualizations. A diverse group of scientists, educators, developers, and cognitive psychologists have begun a series of international collaborations to address this issue. The effort was initiated at the National Science Foundation supported Molecular Visualization in Science Education Workshop held in 2001 and has continued through a series of mini-grants. These groups are investigating characteristics of molecular representations and visualizations that enhance learning, interactions with molecular visualizations that best help students learn about molecular structure and dynamics, roles of molecular modeling in chemistry instruction, and fruitful directions for research on molecular visualization in the learning of chemistry. This article summarizes the value of collaboration identified by participants in the workshop and subsequent collaborations. [Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2005, 6 (3), 136-149]

[1]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Prospects for Scientific Visualization as an Educational Technology , 1995 .

[2]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[3]  Robert Bucat,et al.  PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AS A WAY FORWARD: APPLIED RESEARCH IN CHEMISTRY EDUCATION , 2004 .

[4]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  A Web-Based Chemistry Course as a Means To Foster Freshmen Learning , 2003 .

[5]  Michael R. Abraham,et al.  The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students , 1995 .

[6]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[7]  Roy Tasker,et al.  The Use of Video Demonstrations and Particulate Animation in General Chemistry , 2004 .

[8]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Virtual and Physical Molecular Modeling: Fostering Model Perception and Spatial Understanding , 2001, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[9]  Alan K. Griffiths,et al.  Grade-12 Students' Misconceptions Relating to Fundamental Characteristics of Atoms and Molecules. , 1992 .

[10]  David F. Treagust,et al.  SECURING A FUTURE FOR CHEMICAL EDUCATION , 2004 .

[11]  Daniel C. Edelson,et al.  Creating Science Learning Tools from Experts ’ Investigation Tools : A Design Framework , 1997 .

[12]  Jerry P. Suits,et al.  Instructional Design of Scientific Simulations and Modeling Software to Support Student Construction of Perceptual to Conceptual Bridges , 2002 .

[13]  Frances R. Curcio,et al.  The Roles of Representation in School Mathematics: 2001 Yearbook , 2001 .

[14]  George M. Bodner,et al.  Mental Models : The Role of Representations in Problem Solving in Chemistry PROCEEDINGS , 2002 .

[15]  Roy Tasker Using multimedia to visualize the molecular world : educational theory into practice , 2005 .

[16]  Stellan Ohlsson,et al.  Exploring multiple representations in elementary school science education , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2001.

[17]  Vickie M. Williamson,et al.  Molecular Visualization in Science Education: An Evaluation of an NSF-Sponsored Workshop , 2005 .

[18]  Gail Chittleborough,et al.  The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations , 2003 .

[19]  P. D. Bailey Chemical education : theory and practice , 2002 .

[20]  C. L. Habraken Perceptions of chemistry: Why is the common perception of chemistry, the most visual of sciences, so distorted? , 1996 .

[21]  Laxmikant V. Kale,et al.  NAMD2: Greater Scalability for Parallel Molecular Dynamics , 1999 .

[22]  B. Laeng,et al.  A Redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotations Test - Different Versions and Factors That Affect Performance , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[23]  D. Ardaç,et al.  Effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students' understanding of chemical change , 2004 .

[24]  Stanley G. Smith From Mainframes to the Web: 1998 George C. Pimentel Award , 1998 .

[25]  Onno de Jong Crossing the borders : Chemical education research and teaching practice PROCEEDINGS , 2000 .

[26]  A. Shusterman,et al.  Teaching Chemistry with Electron Density Models , 1997 .

[27]  Mark Langdon SECURING A FUTURE , 2002 .

[28]  R. Kozma,et al.  Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena , 1997 .

[29]  Robert B. Kozma,et al.  Use of Simultaneous-Synchronized Macroscopic, Microscopic, and Symbolic Representations To Enhance the Teaching and Learning of Chemical Concepts , 1997 .

[30]  Martin B. Jones Molecular Modeling in the Undergraduate Chemistry Curriculum , 2001 .

[31]  A. H. Johnstone,et al.  The development of chemistry teaching: a changing response to changing demand , 1993 .