Three-dimensional preoperative planning software and a novel information transfer technology improve glenoid component positioning.

BACKGROUND We hypothesized that a novel surgical method, in which three-dimensional (3-D) preoperative planning software is generated to create a patient-specific surgical model that is used with a reusable and adjustable tool, could substantially improve the positioning accuracy of the glenoid guide pin used in total shoulder arthroplasty. We tested this method using bone models from patients with shoulder pathology and compared the results with those achieved using surgical methods representing the current standard of care. METHODS Three surgeons with a variety of surgical experience placed a guide pin in nine bone models from patients with a variety of glenohumeral arthritis severity using (1) standard instrumentation alone, (2) standard instrumentation and 3-D preoperative surgical planning, and (3) the reusable transfer device and 3-D preoperative surgical planning. A postoperative 3-D computed tomography scan of the bone model was made and registered to the preoperative plan, and the differences between the actual and planned pin locations and trajectories were measured. RESULTS Use of the standard instrumentation combined with 3-D preoperative planning software improved guide pin positioning compared with standard instrumentation and preoperative planning using 2-D imaging. The accuracy of pin positioning increased by 4.5° ± 1.0° in version (p < 0.001), 3.3° ± 1.3° in inclination (p = 0.013), and 0.4 ± 0.2 mm in location (p = 0.042). Use of the adjustable and reusable device and the 3-D software improved pin positioning by a further 3.7° ± 0.9° in version, 8.1° ± 1.2° in inclination, and 1.2 ± 0.2 mm in location (p < 0.001 for all) compared with standard instrumentation and the 3-D software; the improvement compared with use of standard instrumentation with 2-D imaging was 8.2° ± 0.9° in version, 11.4° ± 1.2° in inclination, and 1.7 ± 0.2 mm in location (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS Use of 3-D preoperative planning and use of the patient-specific bone model and transfer device both improved the positioning accuracy of the pin used to guide placement of the glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Proper positioning of the glenoid component would be expected to improve the function and durability of the joint replacement.

[1]  Tom R Norris,et al.  Decision making in glenohumeral arthroplasty. , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  J. Bryan,et al.  Effect of glenoid deformity on glenoid component placement in primary shoulder arthroplasty. , 2012, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[3]  P. Büchler,et al.  Risks of loosening of a prosthetic glenoid implanted in retroversion. , 2006, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[4]  Sunil J Rao,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2003 .

[5]  Kimerly A Powell,et al.  Use of three-dimensional computed tomography for the analysis of the glenoid anatomy. , 2005, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[6]  J. Bryan,et al.  Quantitative analysis of glenoid bone loss in osteoarthritis using three-dimensional computed tomography scans. , 2008, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[7]  J. Bryan,et al.  The influence of three-dimensional computed tomography images of the shoulder in preoperative planning for total shoulder arthroplasty. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  Jason C. Ho,et al.  Glenoid component retroversion is associated with osteolysis. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  C. Gerber,et al.  Effects of glenoid component version on humeral head displacement and joint reaction forces: an experimental study. , 2006, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[10]  Gerald Williams,et al.  Prosthetic positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty. , 2005, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[11]  P. Parizel,et al.  Accuracy of placement of the glenoid component in reversed shoulder arthroplasty with and without navigation. , 2011, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[12]  James A. Johnson,et al.  Improved accuracy of computer assisted glenoid implantation in total shoulder arthroplasty: an in-vitro randomized controlled trial. , 2009, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[13]  J. Bryan,et al.  Comparison of patient-specific instruments with standard surgical instruments in determining glenoid component position: a randomized prospective clinical trial. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  J. Noble,et al.  The management of significant glenoid deficiency in total shoulder arthroplasty. , 2000, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[15]  P. Habermeyer,et al.  Improved accuracy of glenoid positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty with intraoperative navigation: a prospective-randomized clinical study. , 2009, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[16]  Frederick A Matsen,et al.  The complex characteristics of 282 unsatisfactory shoulder arthroplasties. , 2007, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.