Restoration of Atrial Mechanical Function after Successful Radio-Frequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Flutter

Background: Atrial mechanical dysfunction and its recovery time course after successful radiofrequency ablation of chronic atrial flutter (AFL) has been largely unknown. We serially evaluated left atrial function by echocardiography after successful ablation of chronic atrial flutter. Methods: In 13 patients with chronic AFL, mitral E wave A wave, and the ratio of A/E velocity were measured at 1 day, 1 month, 3 months and 6–12 months after successful radiofrequency (RF) ablation. Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) technique was also used to avoid load-dependent variation in the flow velocity pattern. Results: Left atrial mechanical function, assessed by A wave velocity and the annular motion, was depressed at 1 day, but improved significantly at 1 month and maintained through 6–12 months after the ablation. Left atrial size did not change significantly. Conclusion: Left atrial mechanical function was depressed immediately after successful RF ablation of chronic AFL, but it improved significantly after 1 month and was maintained over one year.

[1]  J. Senges,et al.  Risk of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial flutter. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  F. Morady,et al.  Acute changes in spontaneous echo contrast and atrial function after cardioversion of persistent atrial flutter. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  L. Epstein,et al.  Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias. Results and mechanisms. , 1994, Circulation.

[4]  P. Grayburn,et al.  Prevalence of thrombus, spontaneous echo contrast, and atrial stunning in patients undergoing cardioversion of atrial flutter. A prospective study using transesophageal echocardiography. , 1997, Circulation.

[5]  F. Marchlinski,et al.  Conduction block in the inferior vena caval-tricuspid valve isthmus: association with outcome of radiofrequency ablation of type I atrial flutter. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  M R Franz,et al.  Electrical remodeling of the human atrium: similar effects in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  R. Page,et al.  Effect of radiofrequency ablation on atrial mechanical function in patients with atrial flutter. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  M. Silverman,et al.  Direct-current cardioversion for the conversion of atrial flutter. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  C. Tai,et al.  Tachycardia-induced change of atrial refractory period in humans: rate dependency and effects of antiarrhythmic drugs. , 1998, Circulation.

[10]  J. Thomas,et al.  Left atrial appendage "stunning" after electrical cardioversion of atrial flutter: an attenuated response compared with atrial fibrillation as the mechanism for lower susceptibility to thromboembolic events. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  F. Loop,et al.  Role of prophylactic anticoagulation for direct current cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  H. Mond,et al.  Left atrial "stunning" following radiofrequency catheter ablation of chronic atrial flutter. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  B. Olshansky,et al.  Thromboembolism in chronic atrial flutter: is the risk underestimated? , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  B. Drew,et al.  Risk of thromboembolism in chronic atrial flutter. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.