Paternalistic Leadership and Subordinate Responses: Establishing a Leadership Model in Chinese Organizations

Paternalistic leadership (PL) is the prevalent leadership style in Chinese business organizations. With an approach similar to patriarchy, PL entails an evident and powerful authority that shows consideration for subordinates with moral leadership. Although PL is widespread in Chinese business organizations, very few studies have focused on this leadership style and those that have were simply conceptual analyses and not empirical studies. We sampled 543 subordinates from local businesses in Taiwan to investigate PL, Western transformational leadership, and subordinate responses to these two leadership styles. Our hypotheses were as follows: (1) PL has a significant and unique effect on subordinate responses compared to Western transformational leadership; (2) there exists an interaction between the three elements of PL (benevolence, morality, and authoritarianism)and subordinate responses; and (3) the authority orientation of a subordinate's traditionality has a moderating effect upon the relation between PL and subordinate responses. Statistical analyses generally supported these hypotheses. Directions for follow-up studies are offered and implications for leadership theory and practice are discussed.

[1]  B. Bass.  A New Paradigm for Leadership: An Inquiry into Transformational Leadership. , 1996 .

[2]  Chinese subjects' dilemmas: Humility and cognitive laziness as problems in using rating scales. , 1987 .

[3]  E. A. Fleishman,et al.  The description of supervisory behavior. , 1953 .

[4]  Amitai Etzioni,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations. , 1962 .

[5]  Bor-Shiuan Cheng,et al.  A Triad Model of Paternalistic Leadership: Constructs and Measurement , 2000 .

[6]  G. Redding.  The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism , 1995 .

[7]  B. Cheng,et al.  Social Orientation in Chinese Societies: A Comparison of Employees from Taiwan and Chinese Mainland , 2001 .

[8]  David Y. F. Ho,et al.  Filial piety and its psychological consequences. , 1996 .

[9]  Kuo-shu Yang.  The psychological transformation of the Chinese people as a result of societal modernization. , 1996 .

[10]  Bor-Shiuan Cheng,et al.  A Cultural Analysis of Paternalistic Leadership in Chinese Organizations , 2000 .

[11]  B. Bass.  LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE BEYOND EXPECTATIONS , 1985 .

[12]  B. Bass.  Transformational Leadership: Industrial, Military, and Educational Impact , 1997 .

[13]  Kuo-shu Yang,et al.  Chinese Responses to Modernization: A Psychological Analysis , 1998 .

[14]  Paul E. Spector.  Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? , 1987 .

[15]  R. R. Blake,et al.  A comparative analysis of situationalism and 9,9 management by principle , 1982 .

[16]  T. Kline,et al.  Common Method Variance and Specification Errors: A Practical Approach to Detection , 2000, The Journal of psychology.

[17]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and , 1997 .

[18]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Transformational Leader Behaviors and Substitutes for Leadership as Determinants of Employee Satisfaction, Commitment, Trust, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors , 1996 .

[19]  G. Yukl,et al.  Leadership in Organizations , 1981 .

[20]  S. Ho,et al.  Leadership and Values. , 1977 .

[21]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors , 1990 .

[22]  Robert I Westwood,et al.  Harmony and Patriarchy: The Cultural Basis for 'Paternalistic Headship' Among the Overseas Chinese , 1997 .

[23]  Robert I Westwood,et al.  Headship and leadership , 1992 .

[24]  Chi-yue Chiu,et al.  Component ideas of individualism, collectivism, and social organization: An application in the study of Chinese culture. , 1994 .

[25]  Sarah B. Proctor-Thomson,et al.  Perceived Integrity of Transformational Leaders in Organisational Settings , 2002 .

[26]  Chung-fang Yang.  Familism and development: An examination of the role of family in contemporary China mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan. , 1988 .

[27]  Kuo-shu Yang.  Monocultural and cross-cultural indigenous approaches: The royal road to the development of a balanced global psychology. , 2000 .

[28]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  Ethical dimensions of leadership , 1995 .

[29]  M. Morris,et al.  Views from Inside and Outside: Integrating Emic and Etic Insights about Culture and Justice Judgment , 1999 .

[30]  C. Clogg,et al.  Statistical Methods for Comparing Regression Coefficients Between Models , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.