Media ritual in catastrophic time

Television news coverage of Hurricane Katrina's impact on Mississippi and New Orleans presented viewers with broadcast journalists who were on the scene but were largely left without access to traditional government sources. Through a textual analysis of transcripts of cable and network news reports, this study compares the media's performance during the six days following 29 August, 2005 to news coverage following 11 September, 2001. In this way, it interprets how and why the 11 September attacks produced a `sphere of consensus' unifying the media and the state, while Katrina produced the opposite dynamic. Central to this analysis is the normative concept of `media ritual', especially where the media's ritual consensus with government was `de-centered' by the federal government's de facto absence from the storm scene for that crucial week.

[1]  J. Thompson.  Ideology and Modern Culture: Critical Social Theory in the Era of Mass Communication , 1990 .

[2]  Philip Garland,et al.  U.S. National Identity, Political Elites, and a Patriotic Press Following September 11 , 2004 .

[3]  M. Schudson.  What’s Unusual About Covering Politics as Usual , 2003 .

[4]  J. Soloski,et al.  News reporting and professionalism: some constraints on the reporting of the news , 1989 .

[5]  J. Ettema.  Press rites and race relations: A study of mass‐mediated ritual , 1990 .

[6]  Broadcast news, the live ‘two-way’ and the case of Andrew Gilligan , 2006 .

[7]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Media, Terrorism, and Emotionality: Emotional Differences in Media Content and Public Reactions to the September 11th Terrorist Attacks , 2003 .

[8]  Daniel C. Hallin,et al.  The Uncensored War: The Media and Vietnam , 1986 .

[9]  Crafting cultural resonance , 2005 .

[10]  Gaye Tuchman.  Making News by Doing Work: Routinizing the Unexpected , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  Agon and ritual: The Gulf War as popular culture and as television drama , 1993 .

[12]  Gaye Tuchman.  Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality , 1978 .

[13]  James W. Carey,et al.  A Cultural Approach to Communication , 2008 .

[14]  J. Carey.  Communication as culture: Essays on media and society , 1989 .

[15]  Ronald Bishop,et al.  From behind the Walls: Boundary Work by News Organizations in Their Coverage of Princess Diana's Death , 1999 .

[16]  Murray Edelman,et al.  Contestable categories and public opinion , 1993 .

[17]  R. Bishop.  The accidental journalist: shifting professional boundaries in the wake of Leonardo DiCaprio's interview with former President Clinton , 2004 .

[18]  Nick Couldry,et al.  Media Rituals: A Critical Approach , 2003 .

[19]  Tom Rosenstiel,et al.  The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect , 2001 .

[20]  Press Performance as Political Ritual , 1981 .

[21]  Karin Becker.  Media and the ritual process , 1995 .

[22]  David T. Z. Mindich.  Just the Facts: How "Objectivity" Came to Define American Journalism , 1998 .

[23]  Dan Schiller.  Objectivity and the News: The Public and the Rise of Commercial Journalism , 1981 .

[24]  Elisabeth Anker,et al.  Villains, Victims and Heroes: Melodrama, Media, and September 11 , 2005 .

[25]  Amy Reynolds,et al.  This Just in … How National TV News Handled the Breaking “Live” Coverage of September 11 , 2003 .

[26]  Colin Sparks,et al.  Tabloid tales: global debates over media standards , 2000 .

[27]  Dan Berkowitz,et al.  Non‐Routine News and Newswork: Exploring a What‐a‐Story , 1992 .

[28]  Motti Neiger,et al.  Between the nation and the profession: journalists as members of contradicting communities , 2005 .