Self-Interference Channel Estimation Algorithm Based on Maximum-Likelihood Estimator in In-Band Full-Duplex Underwater Acoustic Communication System

To efficiently cancel the self-interference (SI) caused by the simultaneous transmission and reception in in-band full-duplex (IBFD) underwater acoustic (UWA) communication system, we propose a novel channel estimation approach to estimate the sparse SI channel, the proposed channel estimation algorithm has a better estimation performance than the traditional channel estimator. In the IBFD radio communication system, the SI and intended channels are estimated through using training symbols in different time slots, and therefore, the effect of intended signal can be avoided in SI channel estimation. Because of the time variable and longtime delay in the UWA channel, we cannot estimate the SI and intended channel in different time slots. The intended signal is treated as additive noise when estimating SI channel in the IBFD-UWA communication system, and thus, the SI channel estimation is affected by non-Gaussian noise and the traditional algorithms designed for Gaussian noise typically perform poor. In view of this situation, we propose a maximum likelihood (ML) with sparse constraint to estimate the sparse SI channel. The ML with sparse constraint is derived via combining a sparse constraint into conventional ML cost function and using stochastic gradient algorithm to get the iterative formula, thereby resulting in a better performance. Extensive simulations and experimental results show that the proposed algorithm has faster convergence and better cancelation performance compared with traditional ML and least square. We also present the convergence and steady-state mean-squared error analysis of the proposed algorithm.

[1]  Songzuo Liu,et al.  Full-duplex, multi-user and parameter reconfigurable underwater acoustic communication modem , 2013, 2013 OCEANS - San Diego.

[2]  Taneli Riihonen,et al.  Analog and digital self-interference cancellation in full-duplex MIMO-OFDM transceivers with limited resolution in A/D conversion , 2012, 2012 Conference Record of the Forty Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR).

[3]  Alfred O. Hero,et al.  Sparse LMS for system identification , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[4]  Tho Le-Ngoc,et al.  A Maximum-Likelihood Channel Estimator for Self-Interference Cancelation in Full-Duplex Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[5]  A.B. Baggeroer,et al.  The state of the art in underwater acoustic telemetry , 2000, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[6]  J. A. Catipovic,et al.  Phase-coherent digital communications for underwater acoustic channels , 1994 .

[7]  Jing Tian,et al.  A time-reversal based digital cancelation scheme for in-band full-duplex underwater acoustic systems , 2016, OCEANS 2016 - Shanghai.

[8]  Tho Le-Ngoc,et al.  Channel Estimation and Self-Interference Cancelation in Full-Duplex Communication Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[9]  Vimal Bhatia,et al.  Sparse Channel Estimation for Interference Limited OFDM Systems and Its Convergence Analysis , 2017, IEEE Access.

[10]  Xiang-Gen Xia,et al.  Interference cancellation in in-band full-duplex underwater acoustic systems , 2015, OCEANS 2015 - MTS/IEEE Washington.

[11]  Nanning Zheng,et al.  Steady-State Mean-Square Error Analysis for Adaptive Filtering under the Maximum Correntropy Criterion , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[12]  Gang Qiao,et al.  A full-duplex based protocol for underwater acoustic communication networks , 2013, 2013 OCEANS - San Diego.

[13]  Ross D. Murch,et al.  Full-Duplex Wireless Communication Using Transmitter Output Based Echo Cancellation , 2011, 2011 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference - GLOBECOM 2011.

[14]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Low Complexity OFDM Detector for Underwater Acoustic Channels , 2006, OCEANS 2006.

[15]  Sergio F. Ochoa,et al.  Real-Time Communication Support for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2017, Sensors.

[16]  Bernard Mulgrew,et al.  Non-parametric likelihood based channel estimator for Gaussian mixture noise , 2007, Signal Process..

[17]  L. Freitag,et al.  Pilot-tone based ZP-OFDM Demodulation for an Underwater Acoustic Channel , 2006, OCEANS 2006.

[18]  Ashutosh Sabharwal,et al.  Experiment-Driven Characterization of Full-Duplex Wireless Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[19]  Taneli Riihonen,et al.  Analysis of Oscillator Phase-Noise Effects on Self-Interference Cancellation in Full-Duplex OFDM Radio Transceivers , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[20]  Ahmed M. Eltawil,et al.  Rate Gain Region and Design Tradeoffs for Full-Duplex Wireless Communications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[21]  Mikko Valkama,et al.  Widely Linear Digital Self-Interference Cancellation in Direct-Conversion Full-Duplex Transceiver , 2014, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[22]  Philip Schniter,et al.  Hardware phenomenological effects on cochannel full-duplex MIMO relay performance , 2012, 2012 Conference Record of the Forty Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR).

[23]  Taneli Riihonen,et al.  Full-Duplex Transceiver System Calculations: Analysis of ADC and Linearity Challenges , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[24]  Ender M. Eksioglu,et al.  RLS Algorithm With Convex Regularization , 2011, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.