Peak Flow Measurements in Children with Asthma: What Happens at School?

Background. Self-monitoring of symptoms or peak flow monitoring (PFM) is recommended for all asthma patients and is commonly included in asthma management plans. Limited data are available documenting PFM outcomes in school settings. Method. Three hundred twenty-three urban children with persistent asthma were enrolled in a school-based study that implemented an internet-based asthma monitoring and data collection system. The mean age of the children was 10.0 (SD 2.1) years; 57% were male and 91% were African American. Children logged in daily to an internet-based program to record their asthma symptoms and PFM reading. Teachers logged in daily to confirm the PFM readings. School staff responsible for student health reported actions taken for low PFM readings. Results. A total of 12,245 child reports were completed; 98% (n = 11,974) had corresponding teacher reports, confirming the peak flow meter readings reported by the children. The prevalence of reported asthma symptoms varied across PFM readings; the highest prevalence occurred in the setting of red zone readings, with intermediate prevalence in the setting of yellow zone readings, and lowest prevalence in the setting of green zone readings. The actions reported in response to children's symptoms and peak flow results similarly varied; however, instances of no action were reported in the setting of yellow and red zone readings. When comparing the “worst days” of children who had ever had a red or yellow PFM reading with those of children who only had exhibited green, there was a nonsignificant trend toward fewer symptoms in the green-only group. Additionally, there was a nonsignificant trend toward a greater likelihood of being sent to the office or school nurse with greater symptoms in the setting of a yellow or red zone reading. Conclusions. On the whole, peak flow readings tended to correspond to asthma disease activity. However, the data indicate that school staff may be more inclined to take action based on their own perceptions of a child's asthma or respond to children's subjective reports of asthma symptoms rather than using a more objective measure of disease activity provided by a peak flow meter.

[1]  P. Gibson,et al.  Written action plans for asthma: an evidence-based review of the key components , 2004, Thorax.

[2]  Brigit VanGraafeiland,et al.  National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. , 2002, The Nurse practitioner.

[3]  M. Chan-yeung,et al.  Changes in peak flow, symptom score, and the use of medications during acute exacerbations of asthma. , 1996, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[4]  M. McEwen,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial Using the School for Anti-inflammatory Therapy in Asthma , 2003, The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma.

[5]  R. Stein,et al.  How does home management of asthma exacerbations by parents of inner-city children differ from NHLBI guideline recommendations? National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. , 1999, Pediatrics.

[6]  M. Kavuru,et al.  Utility of peak expiratory flow monitoring. , 1998, Chest.

[7]  D. Taylor,et al.  A randomized trial comparing peak expiratory flow and symptom self-management plans for patients with asthma attending a primary care clinic. , 1998, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[8]  M. Webber,et al.  Do school-based health centers provide adequate asthma care? , 2003, The Journal of school health.

[9]  M. McEwen,et al.  School-based management of chronic asthma among inner-city African-American schoolchildren in Dallas, Texas. , 1998, The Journal of school health.

[10]  S. Redline,et al.  Are peak flow and symptom measures good predictors of asthma hospitalizations and unscheduled visits? † , 2001, Pediatric pulmonology.

[11]  C. Henderson,et al.  Symptom monitoring in childhood asthma: a randomized clinical trial comparing peak expiratory flow rate with symptom monitoring. , 2002, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[12]  P. Enright,et al.  Ambulatory monitoring of peak expiratory flow. Reproducibility and quality control. , 1995, Chest.

[13]  L. Gerald,et al.  Asthma agents: monitoring asthma in school. , 2006, The Journal of school health.

[14]  N. Lurie,et al.  Asthma outcomes at an inner-city school-based health center. , 2001, The Journal of school health.

[15]  J. Zorc,et al.  Patient self-management of acute asthma: adherence to national guidelines a decade later. , 2001, Pediatrics.

[16]  S. Redline,et al.  Short‐term compliance with peak flow monitoring: Results from a study of inner city children with asthma , 1996, Pediatric pulmonology.

[17]  L. Gerald,et al.  Design of the supervised asthma therapy study: implementing an adherence intervention in urban elementary schools. , 2008, Contemporary clinical trials.

[18]  R. Harrist,et al.  An assessment of peak expiratory flow as a surrogate measurement of FEV1 in stable asthmatic children. , 1989, Chest.

[19]  A. Butz,et al.  Rural School Nurses' Asthma Education Needs , 2001, The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma.

[20]  P. Sly,et al.  Accuracy of mini peak flow meters in indicating changes in lung function in children with asthma , 1994, BMJ.

[21]  John Wlodarczyk,et al.  Using Quality-Control Analysis of Peak Expiratory Flow Recordings To Guide Therapy for Asthma , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[22]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Population-Based Screening or Case Detection for Asthma: Are We Ready? , 2003, The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma.

[23]  E. Israel,et al.  The utility of peak flow, symptom scores, and beta-agonist use as outcome measures in asthma clinical research. , 2001, Chest.

[24]  Howard Taras,et al.  Impact of school nurse case management on students with asthma. , 2004, The Journal of school health.