Using pictographs as traits to explore morphological diversity in sharks

Abstract Body shape is a foundational trait on the differences between species. However, morphological measurements can be simplifying and, for many taxa, can be distorted upon preservation or are difficult to collect due to a species' habit or size. Scientific illustrations, or pictographs, provide information on a species' morphology but are rarely used as traits. Here, we demonstrate the use of pictographs using two shark clades: Lamniformes and Carcharhinidae + Sphyrnidae. After collecting 473 pictographs from 67 species across 12 sources, we used landmarking to show that measurements derived from pictographs do not substantially differ from those garnered from specimens. We then used Elliptical Fourier Analysis and principal components analysis to construct a multivariate morphospace. Using global shape measurements, we evaluated whether substantial variability in body shape was introduced by habitat association, endemism, or illustrator. We found that a species' habitat preference strongly influenced the discovery rate of pictographs and the within‐species similarity. While illustrations varied within a species, only a limited set of illustrators exhibited significant systematic variability. We also demonstrated the utility of pictographs in two common applications. For ancestral trait reconstruction, we developed a simple extension to estimate body shapes from principal components and, in doing so, observed that the Lamnid body plan diverged from the rest of Lamniformes ~100 MYA. For phylogenetic generalized linear mixed models (PGLMM), we found that the pictographs had greater explanatory power than traditional morphological measurements. We used the PGLMM to show that higher endemism across Carcharhinidae + Sphyrnidae taxa correlates with body shapes that have caudal fins with small heterocercal angles and more pronounced second dorsal/anal fins. We concluded that pictographs are likely an undervalued and easy‐to‐digitize data source on a species' body shape with numerous established methods for comparing pictographs and assessing variability.

[1]  Zachary A. Siders,et al.  Functional and phylogenetic diversity of sharks in the Northeastern Pacific , 2022, Journal of Biogeography.

[2]  Phil Sternes,et al.  Body forms of extant lamniform sharks (Elasmobranchii: Lamniformes), and comments on the morphology of the extinct megatooth shark, Otodus megalodon, and the evolution of lamniform thermophysiology , 2022, Historical Biology.

[3]  D. Irschick,et al.  Field-Based Feeding Performance and Kinematics of Bull Sharks, Carcharhinus leucas (Carcharhiniformes: Carcharhinidae) , 2021, Ichthyology & Herpetology.

[4]  D. Adams,et al.  geomorph v4.0 and gmShiny: Enhanced analytics and a new graphical interface for a comprehensive morphometric experience , 2021, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[5]  Ryan A. Peterson Finding Optimal Normalizing Transformations via bestNormalize , 2021, R J..

[6]  M. Benton,et al.  Body dimensions of the extinct giant shark Otodus megalodon: a 2D reconstruction , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Phil Sternes,et al.  Body forms in sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) and their functional, ecological, and evolutionary implications. , 2020, Zoology.

[8]  Lucas A. Nell,et al.  phyr: An R package for phylogenetic species-distribution modelling in ecological communities , 2020, bioRxiv.

[9]  Hui Zou,et al.  A simple method to improve principal components regression , 2020, Stat.

[10]  D. Ramler,et al.  Negative allometric growth during ontogeny in the large pelagic filter-feeding basking shark , 2019, Zoomorphology.

[11]  D. Moen What Determines the Distinct Morphology of Species with a Particular Ecology? The Roles of Many-to-One Mapping and Trade-Offs in the Evolution of Frog Ecomorphology and Performance , 2019, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Michael S. Y. Lee,et al.  Geometric morphometrics, homology and cladistics: review and recommendations , 2018, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[13]  M. Dahlheim,et al.  Quantifying variation in killer whale (Orcinus orca) morphology using elliptical Fourier analysis , 2019 .

[14]  C. Scherber,et al.  X‐ray computed tomography and its potential in ecological research: A review of studies and optimization of specimen preparation , 2018, Ecology and evolution.

[15]  Edzer Pebesma,et al.  Simple Features for R: Standardized Support for Spatial Vector Data , 2018, R J..

[16]  Tyler S. Kuhn,et al.  Global priorities for conserving the evolutionary history of sharks, rays and chimaeras , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[17]  Casper W. Berg,et al.  glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero-inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling , 2017, R J..

[18]  G. Lauder,et al.  A comparative morphological analysis of body and fin shape for eight shark species , 2017 .

[19]  A. Ives,et al.  The statistical need to include phylogeny in trait‐based analyses of community composition , 2017 .

[20]  F. Santini,et al.  The effect of habitat on modern shark diversification , 2014, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[21]  Cédric Gaucherel,et al.  Momocs: Outline Analysis Using R , 2014 .

[22]  Dean C. Adams,et al.  A field comes of age: geometric morphometrics in the 21 st century , 2013 .

[23]  Liam J. Revell,et al.  phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things) , 2012 .

[24]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation and comparison of assemblages , 2012 .

[25]  Kelly A. Carscadden,et al.  Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services , 2011 .

[26]  Anthony R. Ives,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models for phylogenetic analyses of community structure , 2011 .

[27]  J. Ragle,et al.  IUCN Red List of Threatened Species , 2010 .

[28]  M. Miya,et al.  Some aspects of the biology of the goblin shark, Mitsukurina owstoni, collected from the Tokyo Submarine Canyon and adjacent waters, Japan , 2007, Ichthyological Research.

[29]  B. Enquist,et al.  Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  Paul L. Rosin Computing global shape measures , 2005 .

[31]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Relationships among eigenshape analysis, Fourier analysis, and analysis of coordinates , 1986 .

[32]  R. Steel Sharks of the World , 1985 .

[33]  L. Compagno,et al.  Sharks of the world :an annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date , 1984 .

[34]  P. Lestrel A Fourier analytic procedure to describe complex morphological shapes. , 1982, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[35]  G. H. Geen,et al.  Morphometric changes in an elasmobranch (Squalus acanthias) after preservation. , 1977, Canadian journal of zoology.

[36]  Keith Stewart Thomson,et al.  Body Form and Locomotion in Sharks , 1977 .

[37]  T. Kamohara Fishes of Japan in color , 1967 .