The roles of polarity and symmetry in the perceptual grouping of contour fragments.

We describe two experiments that investigate the roles of polarity and symmetry in the perceptual grouping of contour fragments. Observers viewed, for one second on each presentation, arrays of oriented, spatial-frequency band-pass, elements, in which a subset of the elements was aligned along a twisting curve. In each of five conditions we measured observers' ability to detect aligned combinations of even- and odd-symmetric elements, of the same and different polarities, against a background of 'noise' elements. As with previous experiments we found that the 'path' could be reliably detected, even when the elements of the path were oriented at angles of up to +/- 60 deg relative to each other. Detection of the path was still possible when the polarity of path elements alternated. However, the probability of detection of the path was raised significantly when the path elements were all of the same polarity. Perceptual grouping of even-symmetric elements was no different to perceptual grouping of odd-symmetric elements. The results provide evidence, that in achieving integration of contour fragments, the visual system uses a process that is to some degree phase selective. We use the results to describe how the visual system may resolve natural contours when they occur against backgrounds that vary over a wide range of intensities. The data presented here have been published in conference-abstract form (Hayes et al., 1993; Field et al., 1997).

[1]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  J. Movshon,et al.  Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  D. Pollen,et al.  Phase relationships between adjacent simple cells in the visual cortex. , 1981, Science.

[4]  D. Field,et al.  Phase reversal discrimination , 1984, Vision Research.

[5]  INGO RENTSCHLER.  Symmetry-coded cells in the visual cortex? , 1985, Nature.

[6]  I Rentschler,et al.  On the discrimination of micropatterns and textures. , 1986, Human neurobiology.

[7]  D. Field,et al.  The structure and symmetry of simple-cell receptive-field profiles in the cat’s visual cortex , 1986, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[8]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  Terry Caelli,et al.  On the discrimination of compound Gabor signals and textures , 1988, Vision Research.

[10]  D. Burr,et al.  Feature detection in human vision: a phase-dependent energy model , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[11]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Shape from shadows. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  J. Beck,et al.  Line segregation. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[13]  D E Mitchell,et al.  Vernier Acuity with Opposite-Contrast Stimuli , 1990, Perception.

[14]  P. Kellman,et al.  A theory of visual interpolation in object perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[16]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[17]  I Kovács,et al.  A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  U. Polat,et al.  The architecture of perceptual spatial interactions , 1994, Vision Research.

[19]  B Moulden,et al.  Collator units: second-stage orientational filters. , 1994, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[20]  H C Nothdurft,et al.  Common properties of visual segmentation. , 1994, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[21]  David J. Field,et al.  What Is the Goal of Sensory Coding? , 1994, Neural Computation.

[22]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Receptive-field dynamics in the central visual pathways , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[23]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration across depth , 1995, Vision Research.

[24]  Kathy T. Mullen,et al.  Contour integration with colour and luminance contrast , 1996, Vision Research.

[25]  ROBERT F. HESS,et al.  Integrating Contours Within and Through Depth , 1997, Vision Research.

[26]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration in strabismic amblyopia: The sufficiency of an explanation based on positional uncertainty , 1997, Vision Research.

[27]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Absence of contour linking in peripheral vision , 1997, Nature.

[28]  R F Hess,et al.  Relationship between facilitation at threshold and suprathreshold contour integration. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[29]  Suzanne P. McKee,et al.  Constraints on long range interactions mediating contour detection , 1998, Vision Research.

[30]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Spatial Summation in the Receptive Fields of MT Neurons , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.