Amino acid propensities revisited.

Statistical analysis of amino acid patterns in approximately 160,000 alpha-helices in experimentally determined structures revealed di-, tri-, and tetrapeptides, whose frequencies deviate most from the statistical model. Importantly, some sequences were never found in alpha- helices. This fact was detected initially with tripeptides, where nearly 1% of the possible sequences were never seen in the helical segments. For tetrapeptides, this effect is very strong and significant; almost 43% of the possible sequences never appear in alpha-helices. It is possible that there are some steric and energetic restrictions that do not allow these tetrameric amino acid sequences to form alpha-helical structure.

[1]  P Argos,et al.  Oligopeptide biases in protein sequences and their use in predicting protein coding regions in nucleotide sequences , 1988, Proteins.

[2]  P. Y. Chou,et al.  Empirical predictions of protein conformation. , 1978, Annual review of biochemistry.

[3]  Christopher Bystroff,et al.  Helix propensities of short peptides: Molecular dynamics versus bioinformatics , 2003, Proteins.

[4]  K Nishikawa,et al.  Discrimination of intracellular and extracellular proteins using amino acid composition and residue-pair frequencies. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  M. Klapper,et al.  The independent distribution of amino acid near neighbor pairs into polypeptides. , 1977, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[6]  B. Matthews,et al.  Structural basis of amino acid alpha helix propensity. , 1993, Science.

[7]  D. Wetlaufer.  Nucleation, rapid folding, and globular intrachain regions in proteins. , 1973, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  C. Anfinsen.  Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. , 1973, Science.

[9]  J. Skolnick,et al.  Local propensities and statistical potentials of backbone dihedral angles in proteins. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  C. Anfinsen,et al.  The kinetics of formation of native ribonuclease during oxidation of the reduced polypeptide chain. , 1961, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  H. Qian,et al.  Interactions between a helical residue and tertiary structures: helix propensities in small peptides and in native proteins. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  C. Pace,et al.  A helix propensity scale based on experimental studies of peptides and proteins. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[13]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Large differences in the helix propensities of alanine and glycine , 1991, Nature.

[14]  O. Ptitsyn,et al.  Statistical analysis of the distribution of amino acid residues among helical and non-helical regions in globular proteins. , 1969, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  M. Levitt,et al.  Structure-based conformational preferences of amino acids. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  P. Y. Chou,et al.  Conformational parameters for amino acids in helical, beta-sheet, and random coil regions calculated from proteins. , 1974, Biochemistry.

[17]  T. Creighton.  Electrophoretic analysis of the unfolding of proteins by urea. , 1979, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  P. Y. Chou,et al.  Prediction of protein conformation. , 1974, Biochemistry.

[19]  C. Levinthal.  Are there pathways for protein folding , 1968 .