Baseload wind energy: modeling the competition between gas turbines and compressed air energy storage for supplemental generation

Abstract The economic viability of producing baseload wind energy was explored using a cost-optimization model to simulate two competing systems: wind energy supplemented by simple- and combined cycle natural gas turbines (“wind+gas”), and wind energy supplemented by compressed air energy storage (“wind+CAES”). Pure combined cycle natural gas turbines (“gas”) were used as a proxy for conventional baseload generation. Long-distance electric transmission was integral to the analysis. Given the future uncertainty in both natural gas price and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions price, we introduced an effective fuel price, p NGeff , being the sum of the real natural gas price and the GHG price. Under the assumption of p NGeff =$5/GJ (lower heating value), 650 W/m 2 wind resource, 750 km transmission line, and a fixed 90% capacity factor, wind+CAES was the most expensive system at ¢6.0/kWh, and did not break even with the next most expensive wind+gas system until p NGeff =$9.0/GJ. However, under real market conditions, the system with the least dispatch cost (short-run marginal cost) is dispatched first, attaining the highest capacity factor and diminishing the capacity factors of competitors, raising their total cost. We estimate that the wind+CAES system, with a greenhouse gas (GHG) emission rate that is one-fourth of that for natural gas combined cycle plants and about one-tenth of that for pulverized coal plants, has the lowest dispatch cost of the alternatives considered (lower even than for coal power plants) above a GHG emissions price of $35/tC equiv. , with good prospects for realizing a higher capacity factor and a lower total cost of energy than all the competing technologies over a wide range of effective fuel costs. This ability to compete in economic dispatch greatly boosts the market penetration potential of wind energy and suggests a substantial growth opportunity for natural gas in providing baseload power via wind+CAES, even at high natural gas prices.

[1]  Goran Strbac,et al.  QUANTIFYING THE SYSTEM COSTS OF ADDITIONAL RENEWABLES IN 2020 , 2002 .

[2]  A. Karalis,et al.  Air Storage Requirements for a 220 Mwe CAES Plant as a Function of Turbomachinery Selection and Operation , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[3]  Martin Koller,et al.  Advanced Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage for the Integration of Wind Energy , 2004 .

[4]  P. Veers,et al.  Simulating high-frequency wind for long durations , 1993 .

[5]  Henry Kelly,et al.  Renewable energy : sources for fuels and electricity , 1993 .

[6]  H. Kelly,et al.  Utility strategies for using renewables , 1993 .

[7]  G. Keith,et al.  Transmitting 4,000 MW of new windpower from North Dakota to Chicago - New HVDC electric lines or hydrogen pipeline , 2002 .

[8]  H. Holttinen Impact of hourly wind power variations on the system operation in the Nordic countries , 2005 .

[9]  Paul Denholm,et al.  Emissions and energy efficiency assessment of baseload wind energy systems. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  D. J. Malcolm,et al.  WindPACT Turbine Rotor Design Study , 2006 .

[11]  Alfred J. Cavallo,et al.  High-Capacity Factor Wind Energy Systems , 1995 .

[12]  Zhang Shihui,et al.  Large‐scale baseload wind power in China , 1998 .

[13]  L. L. Wendell,et al.  An assessment of the available windy land area and wind energy potential in the contiguous United States , 1991 .

[14]  A. C. Hansen,et al.  WindPACT Turbine Rotor Design, Specific Rating Study; Period of Performance: June 29, 2000--March 1, 2003 , 2003 .

[15]  B. K. Johnson,et al.  HVDC power transmission technology assessment , 1997 .

[16]  Paul Denholm,et al.  Improving the technical, environmental and social performance of wind energy systems using biomass-based energy storage , 2006 .

[17]  Michael Nakhamkin,et al.  New Compressed Air Energy Storage Concept Improves the Profitability of Existing Simple Cycle, Combined Cycle, Wind Energy, and Landfill Gas Power Plants , 2004 .

[18]  Lena Neij,et al.  Cost dynamics of wind power , 1999 .

[19]  A. J. Cavallo,et al.  Cost effective seasonal storage of wind energy , 1995 .

[20]  Joseph F. DeCarolis,et al.  The economics of large-scale wind power in a carbon constrained world , 2006 .

[21]  Donna Heimiller,et al.  Wind Energy Resource Atlas of Mongolia , 2001 .

[22]  G. Keith,et al.  Transmitting 4,000 MW of new windpower from north Dakota to Chicago: new HVDC electric lines or hydrogen pipeline , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting,.

[23]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol: A Cost-Effective Strategy for Meeting Environmental Objectives? , 1999 .

[24]  C. L. Archer,et al.  Evaluation of global wind power , 2005 .

[25]  Alfred J. Cavallo Wind Tubine Cost of Electricity and Capacity Factor , 1997 .