Matrix mechanical plasticity regulates cancer cell migration through confining microenvironments

Studies of cancer cell migration have found two modes: one that is protease-independent, requiring micron-sized pores or channels for cells to squeeze through, and one that is protease-dependent, relevant for confining nanoporous matrices such as basement membranes (BMs). However, many extracellular matrices exhibit viscoelasticity and mechanical plasticity, irreversibly deforming in response to force, so that pore size may be malleable. Here we report the impact of matrix plasticity on migration. We develop nanoporous and BM ligand-presenting interpenetrating network (IPN) hydrogels in which plasticity could be modulated independent of stiffness. Strikingly, cells in high plasticity IPNs carry out protease-independent migration through the IPNs. Mechanistically, cells in high plasticity IPNs extend invadopodia protrusions to mechanically and plastically open up micron-sized channels and then migrate through them. These findings uncover a new mode of protease-independent migration, in which cells can migrate through confining matrix if it exhibits sufficient mechanical plasticity.In order to metastasize, cancer cells must migrate through basement membranes and dense stroma, and proteases are thought to be required due to the confining nature of these matrices. Here the authors use synthetic matrices to show that cells can migrate through confining matrices using force generation alone, rather than protease degradation, if the matrices exhibit mechanical plasticity.

[1]  J. Condeelis,et al.  Tks5 and SHIP2 Regulate Invadopodium Maturation, but Not Initiation, in Breast Carcinoma Cells , 2013, Current Biology.

[2]  N. Peppas,et al.  Bulk characterization and scanning electron microscopy of hydrogels of P(VA-co-NVP). , 1986, Biomaterials.

[3]  D J Mooney,et al.  Alginate hydrogels as synthetic extracellular matrix materials. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[4]  David J Mooney,et al.  Extracellular matrix stiffness and composition jointly regulate the induction of malignant phenotypes in mammary epithelium. , 2014, Nature materials.

[5]  Aleksandra K. Denisin,et al.  Tuning the Range of Polyacrylamide Gel Stiffness for Mechanobiology Applications. , 2016, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[6]  S. Courtneidge Cell migration and invasion in human disease: the Tks adaptor proteins. , 2012, Biochemical Society transactions.

[7]  M. Stack,et al.  Modulation of the Membrane Type 1 Matrix Metalloproteinase Cytoplasmic Tail Enhances Tumor Cell Invasion and Proliferation in Three-dimensional Collagen Matrices* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  Shouren Ge,et al.  Cell adaptation to a physiologically relevant ECM mimic with different viscoelastic properties. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[9]  Catherine C. Park,et al.  Human breast cancer invasion and aggression correlates with ECM stiffening and immune cell infiltration. , 2015, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[10]  L. Joubert Variable Pressure-SEM : a versatile tool for visualization of hydrated and non-conductive specimens , 2017 .

[11]  S. Weiss,et al.  A cancer cell metalloprotease triad regulates the basement membrane transmigration program. , 2006, Genes & development.

[12]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  Measurement of mechanical tractions exerted by cells in three-dimensional matrices , 2010, Nature Methods.

[13]  Nicholas A. Kurniawan,et al.  Mechanistic adaptability of cancer cells strongly affects anti-migratory drug efficacy , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[14]  Shawn P. Carey,et al.  Comparative mechanisms of cancer cell migration through 3D matrix and physiological microtracks. , 2015, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[15]  R. Dudley,et al.  The biomechanical origin of extreme wing allometry in hummingbirds , 2017, Nature Communications.

[16]  Z. Werb,et al.  The extracellular matrix: A dynamic niche in cancer progression , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[17]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Peter H Watson,et al.  Mammographic density is related to stroma and stromal proteoglycan expression , 2003, Breast Cancer Research.

[19]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  MR elastography of breast lesions: Understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the specificity of contrast‐enhanced MR mammography , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  W. T. Chen,et al.  Proteolytic activity of specialized surface protrusions formed at rosette contact sites of transformed cells. , 1989, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[21]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Water Permeation Drives Tumor Cell Migration in Confined Microenvironments , 2014, Cell.

[22]  Thinzar M. Lwin,et al.  Twist1-induced invadopodia formation promotes tumor metastasis. , 2011, Cancer cell.

[23]  M Peter Marinkovich,et al.  Tumour microenvironment: laminin 332 in squamous-cell carcinoma. , 2007, Nature reviews. Cancer.

[24]  S. Weiss,et al.  Navigating ECM barriers at the invasive front: the cancer cell-stroma interface. , 2009, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[25]  J. Burdick,et al.  A practical guide to hydrogels for cell culture , 2016, Nature Methods.

[26]  Robert D. Goldman,et al.  Actin, microtubules, and vimentin intermediate filaments cooperate for elongation of invadopodia , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[27]  Amy E. Robertson,et al.  Invadopodia are required for cancer cell extravasation and are a therapeutic target for metastasis. , 2014, Cell reports.

[28]  S. Courtneidge,et al.  The 'ins' and 'outs' of podosomes and invadopodia: characteristics, formation and function , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[29]  J. Condeelis,et al.  Tumor Cell Invadopodia: Invasive Protrusions that Orchestrate Metastasis. , 2017, Trends in cell biology.

[30]  Guillaume Charras,et al.  Physical influences of the extracellular environment on cell migration , 2014, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[31]  Irving H. Shames Elastic and inelastic stress analysis , 1991 .

[32]  John Condeelis,et al.  Directed cell invasion and migration during metastasis. , 2012, Current opinion in cell biology.

[33]  P. Chavrier,et al.  Contractility of the cell rear drives invasion of breast tumor cells in 3D Matrigel , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Paolo P. Provenzano,et al.  Collagen reorganization at the tumor-stromal interface facilitates local invasion , 2006, BMC medicine.

[35]  B. Fingleton,et al.  Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors and Cancer—Trials and Tribulations , 2002, Science.

[36]  P. Yurchenco Basement membranes: cell scaffoldings and signaling platforms. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[37]  B. Fingleton MMPs as therapeutic targets--still a viable option? , 2008, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[38]  C. Zhan,et al.  Talin2-mediated traction force drives matrix degradation and cell invasion , 2016, Journal of Cell Science.

[39]  M. Sixt,et al.  Preformed portals facilitate dendritic cell entry into afferent lymphatic vessels , 2009, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[40]  Robert M. Hoffman,et al.  Physical limits of cell migration: Control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force , 2013, The Journal of cell biology.

[41]  S. Weiss,et al.  Breaching the basement membrane: who, when and how? , 2008, Trends in cell biology.

[42]  Sterling C. Johnson,et al.  Reduced hippocampal activation during episodic encoding in middle-aged individuals at genetic risk of Alzheimer's Disease: a cross-sectional study , 2006, BMC medicine.

[43]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Substrate stress relaxation regulates cell spreading , 2015, Nature Communications.

[44]  D. Mooney,et al.  Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. , 2012, Progress in polymer science.

[45]  K. Stroka,et al.  Physical confinement alters tumor cell adhesion and migration phenotypes , 2012, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[46]  J. S. Lai,et al.  Creep and Relaxation of Nonlinear Viscoelastic Materials: With an Introduction to Linear Viscoelasticity , 2012 .

[47]  P. Keely,et al.  Rho family GTPases: making it to the third dimension. , 2015, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[48]  D. Loew,et al.  Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce metalloprotease-independent cancer cell invasion of the basement membrane , 2017, Nature Communications.

[49]  Stephen J. Weiss,et al.  Protease-dependent versus -independent cancer cell invasion programs: three-dimensional amoeboid movement revisited , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[50]  J. Condeelis,et al.  A Trio-Rac1-PAK1 signaling axis drives invadopodia disassembly , 2014, Nature Cell Biology.

[51]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Multiple mechanisms of 3D migration: the origins of plasticity. , 2016, Current opinion in cell biology.

[52]  N. Miosge,et al.  Basement membrane components are key players in specialized extracellular matrices , 2010, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[53]  P. Friedl,et al.  The Journal of Cell Biology , 2002 .

[54]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Independent regulation of tumor cell migration by matrix stiffness and confinement , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  Roger D Kamm,et al.  Elucidation of the Roles of Tumor Integrin β1 in the Extravasation Stage of the Metastasis Cascade. , 2016, Cancer research.

[56]  Patricia J Keely,et al.  Mammary gland ECM remodeling, stiffness, and mechanosignaling in normal development and tumor progression. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[57]  Manish J. Butte,et al.  Strain-enhanced stress relaxation impacts nonlinear elasticity in collagen gels , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  Ovijit Chaudhuri,et al.  3D Cell Culture in Interpenetrating Networks of Alginate and rBM Matrix. , 2017, Methods in molecular biology.

[59]  Andrew Callan-Jones,et al.  Confinement and Low Adhesion Induce Fast Amoeboid Migration of Slow Mesenchymal Cells , 2015, Cell.

[60]  Sam A. Johnson,et al.  The netrin receptor DCC focuses invadopodia-driven basement membrane transmigration in vivo , 2013, The Journal of cell biology.

[61]  M. Ringuette,et al.  Collagen I but not Matrigel matrices provide an MMP-dependent barrier to ovarian cancer cell penetration , 2008, BMC Cancer.

[62]  Ovijit Chaudhuri,et al.  Viscoplasticity Enables Mechanical Remodeling of Matrix by Cells. , 2016, Biophysical journal.

[63]  Francis Lin,et al.  Differential effects of EGF gradient profiles on MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell chemotaxis. , 2004, Experimental cell research.

[64]  Ravi A. Desai,et al.  Force transmission during adhesion-independent migration , 2015, Nature Cell Biology.

[65]  Peter Friedl,et al.  Mechanoreciprocity in cell migration , 2017, Nature Cell Biology.

[66]  A. Belegundu,et al.  Introduction to Finite Elements in Engineering , 1990 .

[67]  Manfred Radmacher,et al.  Direct measurement of the lamellipodial protrusive force in a migrating cell , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[68]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity , 2015, Nature materials.

[69]  Peter Friedl,et al.  Compensation mechanism in tumor cell migration , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[70]  J. Irianto,et al.  Nuclear lamin stiffness is a barrier to 3D migration, but softness can limit survival , 2014, The Journal of cell biology.

[71]  H. Kleinman,et al.  Matrigel: basement membrane matrix with biological activity. , 2005, Seminars in cancer biology.

[72]  Michael Kuhn,et al.  Mechanical plasticity of cells. , 2016, Nature materials.

[73]  Daniel A. Fletcher,et al.  Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton , 2010, Nature.

[74]  Zhigang Suo,et al.  Stress-relaxation behavior in gels with ionic and covalent crosslinks. , 2010, Journal of applied physics.

[75]  R. Kamm,et al.  Three-dimensional microfluidic model for tumor cell intravasation and endothelial barrier function , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[76]  G. Davis,et al.  Tumor cell invasion of collagen matrices requires coordinate lipid agonist-induced G-protein and membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase-1-dependent signaling , 2006, Molecular Cancer.