Evaluation of three spatial interpolation methods to estimate forest volume in the municipal forest of the Greek island Skyros

Forest volume is of great interest to forest managers. Plot observations of forest volume are available from planning reports. For managers, however, what is relevant are forest volume surfaces. In this study, three interpolation methods were employed to construct continuous surfaces for the evaluation of forest volume at positions for which no measurements are available. For the Municipal Forest of Skyros Island, we compared spatial predictions derived from Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW), Block Kriging (BK), and Block Co-Kriging (BCK) interpolation methods, as applied to data from 120 sample plots. The existence of spatial autocorrelation in the data was identified using correlograms of Moran’s I index. Spatial outliers were identified and excluded from the analysis using the local Moran’s I index. Only slope, of the examined environmental factors, showed an acceptable correlation with forest volume and was used as an auxiliary variable for BCK. The performance of the three methods was evaluated, using an independent validation set and comparing these indices: mean error (ME) and root mean square error. Additionally, for BK and BCK, the indices, standardized ME, average standard error, and the standardized root-mean-square error were used. For the three interpolation methods, the BK method gave the more accurate results; BCK is the next more accurate method and IDW the third.

[1]  W. Cohen,et al.  Integration of lidar and Landsat ETM+ data for estimating and mapping forest canopy height , 2002 .

[2]  Nikos Nanos,et al.  Spatial prediction of diameter distribution models , 2002 .

[3]  Sören Holm,et al.  On the potential of Kriging for forest management planning , 1998 .

[4]  M. Kimberley,et al.  Comparison of spatial prediction techniques for developing Pinus radiata productivity surfaces across New Zealand , 2009 .

[5]  Alan B. Anderson,et al.  Combining stratification and up-scaling method-block cokriging with remote sensing imagery for sampling and mapping an erosion cover factor , 2007, Ecol. Informatics.

[6]  P. Burrough,et al.  Principles of geographical information systems , 1998 .

[7]  G. Montero,et al.  Spatial Prediction of Diameter Distribution Models in Forestry , 2001 .

[8]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Scale detection in real and artificial landscapes using semivariance analysis , 1998, Landscape Ecology.

[9]  Frederik P. Agterberg,et al.  Interactive spatial data analysis , 1996 .

[10]  W. Tobler.  A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region , 1970 .

[11]  L. Anselin.  Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA , 2010 .

[12]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Spatial prediction of soil properties from landform attributes derived from a digital elevation model , 1994 .

[13]  Fabio Maselli,et al.  Evaluation of statistical methods to estimate forest volume in a mediterranean region , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Peter Holmgren,et al.  Applying objectively estimated and spatially continuous forest parameters in tactical planning to obtain dynamic treatment units , 1997 .

[15]  K. P. Overmarsa,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation in multi-scale land use models , 2003 .

[16]  Michael Edward Hohn,et al.  An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics: by Edward H. Isaaks and R. Mohan Srivastava, 1989, Oxford University Press, New York, 561 p., ISBN 0-19-505012-6, ISBN 0-19-505013-4 (paperback), $55.00 cloth, $35.00 paper (US) , 1991 .

[17]  D. Roberts,et al.  Small-footprint lidar estimation of sub-canopy elevation and tree height in a tropical rain forest landscape , 2004 .

[18]  Daniel Mandallaz,et al.  Estimation of the spatial covariance in Universal Kriging: Application to forest inventory , 2000, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[19]  Phaedon C. Kyriakidis,et al.  Improving spatial distribution estimation of forest biomass with geostatistics: A case study for Rondônia, Brazil , 2007 .

[20]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation , 2000, Technometrics.

[21]  D. Myers.  Pseudo-cross variograms, positive-definiteness, and cokriging , 1991 .

[22]  Kim Lowell,et al.  Forest attributes and spatial autocorrelation and interpolation: effects of alternative sampling schemata in the boreal forest , 1997 .

[23]  A. McBratney,et al.  Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties: V. Co-regionalization and multiple sampling strategy , 1983 .