Transfer learning based multi-fidelity physics informed deep neural network
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Bruno Sudret,et al. Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..
[2] R. L. Iman,et al. Latin hypercube sampling (program user's guide). [LHC, in FORTRAN] , 1980 .
[3] Souvik Chakraborty,et al. Polynomial Correlated Function Expansion , 2017 .
[4] Jens Lorenz,et al. Nonlinear singular perturbation problems and the Engquist-Osher difference scheme , 1981 .
[5] Subhayan De,et al. On transfer learning of neural networks using bi-fidelity data for uncertainty propagation , 2020, International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification.
[6] George Em Karniadakis,et al. Supersensitivity due to uncertain boundary conditions , 2004 .
[7] Atin Roy,et al. Support vector regression based metamodel by sequential adaptive sampling for reliability analysis of structures , 2020, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..
[8] Nicholas Zabaras,et al. Bayesian Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Networks for Surrogate Modeling and Uncertainty Quantification , 2018, J. Comput. Phys..
[9] Loic Le Gratiet,et al. RECURSIVE CO-KRIGING MODEL FOR DESIGN OF COMPUTER EXPERIMENTS WITH MULTIPLE LEVELS OF FIDELITY , 2012, 1210.0686.
[10] C. Farhat. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering , 2019 .
[11] Benjamin Peherstorfer,et al. Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimization , 2018, SIAM Rev..
[12] Rampi Ramprasad,et al. Multifidelity Information Fusion with Machine Learning: A Case Study of Dopant Formation Energies in Hafnia. , 2019, ACS applied materials & interfaces.
[13] K. Ramesh,et al. Digital photoelasticity of glass: A comprehensive review , 2016 .
[14] Paris Perdikaris,et al. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations , 2019, J. Comput. Phys..
[15] Dongbin Xiu,et al. A neural network approach for uncertainty quantification for time-dependent problems with random parameters , 2019, ArXiv.
[16] Andreas C. Damianou,et al. Nonlinear information fusion algorithms for data-efficient multi-fidelity modelling , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[17] Geoffrey T. Parks,et al. Multi-fidelity non-intrusive polynomial chaos based on regression , 2016 .
[18] Klaus Ritter,et al. Adaptive Multilevel Monte Carlo Approximation of Distribution Functions , 2017, 1706.06869.
[19] Reuven Y. Rubinstein,et al. Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method , 1981 .
[20] Irfan Kaymaz,et al. Application Of Kriging Method To Structural Reliability Problems , 2005 .
[21] Andy J. Keane,et al. Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling - A Practical Guide , 2008 .
[22] Souvik Chakraborty,et al. Sequential experimental design based generalised ANOVA , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..
[23] Nam H. Kim,et al. Issues in Deciding Whether to Use Multifidelity Surrogates , 2019, AIAA Journal.
[24] Anders Logg,et al. The FEniCS Project Version 1.5 , 2015 .
[25] Achintya Haldar,et al. Reliability Assessment Using Stochastic Finite Element Analysis , 2000 .
[26] Michael B. Giles,et al. Multilevel Monte Carlo Path Simulation , 2008, Oper. Res..
[27] Dmitry K. Polyushkin,et al. Ultrafast machine vision with 2D material neural network image sensors , 2020, Nature.
[28] Sondipon Adhikari,et al. A Surrogate Based Multi-fidelity Approach for Robust Design Optimization , 2017 .
[29] Yan Wang,et al. Multi-Fidelity Physics-Constrained Neural Network and Its Application in Materials Modeling , 2019, Journal of Mechanical Design.
[30] Ilias Bilionis,et al. Multi-output separable Gaussian process: Towards an efficient, fully Bayesian paradigm for uncertainty quantification , 2013, J. Comput. Phys..
[31] Loic Le Gratiet,et al. Multi-fidelity Gaussian process regression for computer experiments , 2013 .
[32] Daniele Venturi,et al. Multifidelity Information Fusion Algorithms for High-Dimensional Systems and Massive Data sets , 2016, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..
[33] Guigang Zhang,et al. Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..
[34] Martin T. Hagan,et al. Neural network design , 1995 .
[35] Wolfgang A. Wall,et al. A Generalized Probabilistic Learning Approach for Multi-Fidelity Uncertainty Propagation in Complex Physical Simulations , 2020, ArXiv.
[36] Sondipon Adhikari,et al. A Critical Assessment of Kriging Model Variants for High-Fidelity Uncertainty Quantification in Dynamics of composite Shells , 2016, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.
[37] Souvik Chakraborty,et al. An efficient algorithm for building locally refined hp - adaptive H-PCFE: Application to uncertainty quantification , 2017, J. Comput. Phys..
[38] S. Brunton,et al. Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[39] Anupam Chakrabarti,et al. A simple homogenization scheme for 3D finite element analysis of composite bolted joints , 2015 .
[40] Kenny Chowdhary,et al. Machine Learning Models of Errors in Large Eddy Simulation Predictions of Surface Pressure Fluctuations , 2017 .
[41] T. Dhaene,et al. Variable-Fidelity Electromagnetic Simulations and Co-Kriging for Accurate Modeling of Antennas , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.
[42] George Em Karniadakis,et al. A composite neural network that learns from multi-fidelity data: Application to function approximation and inverse PDE problems , 2019, J. Comput. Phys..
[43] Dongbin Xiu,et al. The Wiener-Askey Polynomial Chaos for Stochastic Differential Equations , 2002, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..
[44] R. M. Natal Jorge,et al. Material homogenization technique for composites: A meshless formulation , 2018 .
[45] Stefan Heinrich,et al. Multilevel Monte Carlo Methods , 2001, LSSC.
[46] Satish Chandra,et al. Kriging based saturation flow models for traffic conditions in Indian cities , 2018, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
[47] Timon Rabczuk,et al. Transfer learning enhanced physics informed neural network for phase-field modeling of fracture , 2019, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics.
[48] Raphael T. Haftka,et al. Remarks on multi-fidelity surrogates , 2016, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.
[49] Souvik Chakraborty. Simulation free reliability analysis: A physics-informed deep learning based approach , 2020 .
[50] Barak A. Pearlmutter,et al. Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey , 2015, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[51] Yuan Yu,et al. TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning , 2016, OSDI.
[52] Jian-Xun Wang,et al. A bi-fidelity surrogate modeling approach for uncertainty propagation in three-dimensional hemodynamic simulations , 2019, 1908.10197.
[53] P Perdikaris,et al. Multi-fidelity modelling via recursive co-kriging and Gaussian–Markov random fields , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[54] Appu Haapio,et al. Environmental effect of structural solutions and building materials to a building , 2008 .
[55] Souvik Chakraborty,et al. Graph-Theoretic-Approach-Assisted Gaussian Process for Nonlinear Stochastic Dynamic Analysis under Generalized Loading , 2019 .
[56] Jing Li,et al. Evaluation of failure probability via surrogate models , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..
[57] Alexey Chernov,et al. Approximation of probability density functions by the Multilevel Monte Carlo Maximum Entropy method , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..
[58] Achintya Haldar,et al. Probability, Reliability and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design (Haldar, Mahadevan) , 1999 .
[59] Qingfu Zhang,et al. A multi-fidelity surrogate-model-assisted evolutionary algorithm for computationally expensive optimization problems , 2016, J. Comput. Sci..
[60] G. Karniadakis,et al. Multi-fidelity modelling of mixed convection based on experimental correlations and numerical simulations , 2016, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[61] Sriram Narasimhan,et al. A Gaussian process latent force model for joint input-state estimation in linear structural systems , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.
[62] Yang Zhiyin,et al. Large-eddy simulation: Past, present and the future , 2015 .
[63] D. Lauffenburger,et al. Autocrine loops with positive feedback enable context-dependent cell signaling. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.
[64] Souvik Chakraborty,et al. Hybrid Framework for the Estimation of Rare Failure Event Probability , 2017 .
[65] Liang Yan,et al. Adaptive multi-fidelity polynomial chaos approach to Bayesian inference in inverse problems , 2018, J. Comput. Phys..
[66] Ilias Bilionis,et al. Multi-output local Gaussian process regression: Applications to uncertainty quantification , 2012, J. Comput. Phys..
[67] Paris Perdikaris,et al. Physics-Constrained Deep Learning for High-dimensional Surrogate Modeling and Uncertainty Quantification without Labeled Data , 2019, J. Comput. Phys..
[68] Satish Chandra,et al. Kriging-Based Approach for Estimation of Vehicular Speed and Passenger Car Units on an Urban Arterial , 2017 .
[69] Biswarup Bhattacharyya,et al. A Critical Appraisal of Design of Experiments for Uncertainty Quantification , 2018 .