Evaluation of canal centering ability after preparation with f6 Sky Taper single continuous file systems with or without glide path files

The aim of the study was to evaluate the centering ability of F6 Sky Taper file systems with or without use of glide path files in mesial roots of mandibular first molars. Methods: Sixty freshly extracted mandibular molars were used for the study. A muffle-block was constructed as given by Aviad et al. [8] Photographs were taken of all three cross-sections of each tooth using a DSLR Camera (Nikon Digital, Tokyo, Japan) at a fixed position. The specimens were randomly divided into the following three groups: Group l: Canals prepared using F6 Sky Taper file. Group 2: Canals prepared using Path Glider size 015 file before F6 Sky Taper file. Group 3: Canals prepared using Path Glider size 015 and size 020 files before F6 Sky Taper file. Results: In our study we found that the creation of rotary glide path had no influence on centering ability of F6 Sky Taper rotary file. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the creation of glide path had no influence on the centering ability and increased the total time involved in preparation of curved canals with F6 Sky Taper rotary single file systems.

[1]  B. Y. Cha,et al.  Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. , 2000, Journal of endodontics.

[2]  R. Cunha,et al.  Assessment of the separation incidence of mtwo files used with preflaring: prospective clinical study. , 2012, Journal of endodontics.

[3]  C. Elias,et al.  Torsional properties of pathfinding instruments. , 2011, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[4]  S. W. Schneider,et al.  A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. , 1971, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[5]  G. Mattison,et al.  The survivability of F43 strain of Streptococcus sanguis in root canals filled with gutta-percha and Procosol cement. , 1983, Journal of endodontics.

[6]  U. İnan,et al.  Comparison of shaping ability of RaCe and Hero Shaper instruments in simulated curved canals. , 2008, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[7]  R. Walton,et al.  Endodontics: Principles and Practice , 1989 .

[8]  E. Berutti,et al.  Influence of manual preflaring and torque on the failure rate of ProTaper rotary instruments. , 2004, Journal of endodontics.

[9]  Nahid Ramazani,et al.  An In Vitro Comparison of Root Canal Transportation by Reciproc File With and Without Glide Path , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[10]  C E del Rio,et al.  Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography. , 1996, Journal of endodontics.

[11]  John D West,et al.  The endodontic Glidepath: "Secret to rotary safety". , 2010, Dentistry today.

[12]  Ove A Peters,et al.  Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. , 2004, Journal of endodontics.

[13]  G B Yang,et al.  Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals. , 2006, International endodontic journal.

[15]  A Tamse,et al.  A new muffle model system to study root canal morphology and instrumentation techniques. , 1998, Journal of endodontics.

[16]  A. Walmsley,et al.  Reciprocating root canal technique induces greater debris accumulation than a continuous rotary technique as assessed by 3-dimensional micro-computed tomography. , 2013, Journal of Endodontics.

[17]  J. Simon,et al.  Healing of apical periodontitis after endodontic treatment with and without obturation in dogs. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[18]  F. de Angelis,et al.  Evaluation of a new nickel-titanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals. , 2013, Journal of endodontics.

[19]  G. Cantatore,et al.  The influence of a manual glide path on the separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[20]  A. Scribante,et al.  Effects of NiTi Rotary and Reciprocating Instruments on Debris and Smear Layer Scores: An SEM Evaluation , 2014, Journal of applied biomaterials & functional materials.

[21]  C. E. Fontana,et al.  Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals. , 2012, Journal of endodontics.

[22]  G. B. Sydney,et al.  The radiographic platform: a new method to evaluate root canal preparation in vitro. , 1991, Journal of endodontics.

[23]  L. Gonçalves,et al.  Glide path preparation in S-shaped canals with rotary pathfinding nickel-titanium instruments. , 2013, Journal of endodontics.