MEASUREMENTS OF QoS/QoE PARAMETERS FOR MEDIA STREAMING IN A PMIPv6 TESTBED WITH 802.11 b/g/n WLANs

The growing number of mobile devices and the increasing popularity of multimedia services result in a new challenge of providing mobility in access networks. The paper describes experimental research on media (audio and video) streaming in a mobile IEEE 802.11 b/g/n environment realizing network-based mobility. It is an approach to mobility that requires little or no modification of the mobile terminal. Assessment of relevant parameters has been conducted in an IPv6 testbed. During the tests, both Quality of Service (QoS) and Quality of Experience (QoE) parameters have been considered. Against the background of standard L3 and L2 handovers, an emerging mobility solution named Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) has been examined. Its advantages (L3 connectivity maintenance) and disadvantages (packet loss during handover) are emphasized based on the obtained results. Moreover, a new solution for handover optimization has been proposed. A handoff influence upon audio/video generation and transfer imperfections has been studied and found to be an interesting direction of future work.

[1]  Claude Castelluccia,et al.  Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) Mobility Management , 2008, RFC.

[2]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobility support in IPv6 , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[3]  Josep Paradells Aspas,et al.  Mobile Networks Client-driven load balancing through association control in IEEE 802.11 WLANs , 2009, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[4]  Basavaraj Patil,et al.  Proxy Mobile IPv6 , 2008, RFC.

[5]  Józef Wozniak,et al.  Proactive handover for IEEE 802.11r networks , 2011, 2011 4th Joint IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC 2011).

[6]  Krzysztof Nowicki,et al.  Testbed analysis of video and VoIP transmission performance in IEEE 802.11 b/g/n networks , 2011, Telecommun. Syst..

[7]  Myung-Ki Shin,et al.  Mobility management for all-IP mobile networks: mobile IPv6 vs. proxy mobile IPv6 , 2008, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[8]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Rajeev Koodli Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers , 2009, RFC.

[10]  Telemaco Melia,et al.  IEEE 802.21 and Proxy Mobile IPv6: A network controlled mobility solution , 2011, 2011 Future Network & Mobile Summit.

[11]  Young-Tak Kim,et al.  Low Latency Proactive Handover Scheme for Proxy MIPv6 with MIH , 2008, APNOMS.

[12]  Ali C. Begen,et al.  Not All Packets Are Equal, Part I: Streaming Video Coding and SLA Requirements , 2009, IEEE Internet Computing.

[13]  Ali C. Begen,et al.  Not All Packets Are Equal, Part 2: The Impact of Network Packet Loss on Video Quality , 2009, IEEE Internet Computing.

[14]  Sujata Banerjee,et al.  Metrics for Evaluating Video Streaming Quality in Lossy IEEE 802.11 Wireless Networks , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[15]  Karim El Malki Low-Latency Handoffs in Mobile IPv4 , 2007 .

[16]  Stefan Savage,et al.  SyncScan: practical fast handoff for 802.11 infrastructure networks , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[17]  Eryk Dutkiewicz,et al.  Low latency IP mobility management: protocol and analysis , 2011, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..