Accomplishment in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) and Its Relation to STEM Educational Dose: A 25-Year Longitudinal Study

Two studies examined the relationship between precollegiate advanced/enriched educational experiences and adult accomplishments in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). In Study 1, 1,467 13-year-olds were identified as mathematically talented on the basis of scores 500 (top 0.5%) on the math section of the Scholastic Assessment Test; subsequently, their developmental trajectories were studied over 25 years. Particular attention was paid to high-level STEM accomplishments with low base rates in the general population (STEM PhDs, STEM publications, STEM tenure, STEM patents, and STEM occupations). Study 2 retrospectively profiled the adolescent advanced/enriched educational experiences of 714 top STEM graduate students (mean age 25), and related these experiences to their STEM accomplishments up to age 35. In both longitudinal studies, those with notable STEM accomplishments manifested past histories involving a richer density of advanced precollegiate educational opportunities in STEM (a higher “STEM dose”) than less highly achieving members of their respective cohorts. While both studies are quasi-experimental, they suggest that for mathematically talented and academically motivated young adolescents, STEM accomplishments are facilitated by a rich mix of precollegiate STEM educational opportunities that are designed to be intellectually challenging, even for students at precocious developmental levels. These opportunities appear to be uniformly important for both sexes.

[1]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 2003 .

[2]  D. Lubinski.  Neglected aspects and truncated appraisals in vocational counseling: Interpreting the interest-efficacy association from a broader perspective: Comment on Armstrong and Vogel (2009). , 2010, Journal of counseling psychology.

[3]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. , 2009 .

[4]  M. Begg.  An introduction to categorical data analysis (2nd edn). Alan Agresti, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2007. No. of Pages: 400. Price: $100.95. ISBN: 978‐0‐471‐22618‐5 , 2009 .

[5]  Susan M. Barnett,et al.  Women's underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Ability Differences Among People Who Have Commensurate Degrees Matter for Scientific Creativity , 2008, Psychological science.

[7]  Alice Schroeder,et al.  The Snowball: Warren Buffett and the Business of Life , 2008 .

[8]  J. Tebbs,et al.  An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis , 2008 .

[9]  G. Beard.  American Nervousness, Its Causes and Consequences , 2008 .

[10]  Peter Bodo,et al.  A Champion's Mind: Lessons from a Life in Tennis , 2008 .

[11]  C. Holden.  Encourage Risk, Help Young Researchers, Panel Advises , 2008, Science.

[12]  A. Leshner.  Just Give Them Grants , 2008, Science.

[13]  Thomas L. Friedman,et al.  Hot, Flat, and Crowded: Why We Need a Green Revolution—And How It Can Renew America , 2008 .

[14]  Beryl Lieff Benderly,et al.  Rising Above "The Gathering Storm" , 2007 .

[15]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Contrasting Intellectual Patterns Predict Creativity in the Arts and Sciences , 2007, Psychological science.

[16]  Karen B. Rogers,et al.  Lessons Learned About Educating the Gifted and Talented , 2007 .

[17]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth After 35 Years: Uncovering Antecedents for the Development of Math-Science Expertise , 2006, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[18]  Peter Rooney,et al.  American Competitiveness Initiative , 2006 .

[19]  D. Ross,et al.  The Origin of Mind: Evolution of Brain, Cognition, and General Intelligence , 2006 .

[20]  D. Murphey,et al.  The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century , 2006 .

[21]  David Lubinski,et al.  Tracking Exceptional Human Capital Over Two Decades , 2006, Psychological science.

[22]  Ray Bert,et al.  Book Review: \IThe World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century\N by Thomas L. Friedman. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005 , 2006 .

[23]  David Lubinski,et al.  Creativity and Occupational Accomplishments Among Intellectually Precocious Youths: An Age 13 to Age 33 Longitudinal Study. , 2005 .

[24]  David C. Geary,et al.  The Origin of Mind: Evolution of Brain, Cognition, and General Intelligence , 2004 .

[25]  S. Assouline,et al.  A Nation Deceived: How Schools Hold Back America's Brightest Students. The Templeton National Report on Acceleration. Volume 2. , 2004 .

[26]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Advanced Placement’s Role in Developing Exceptional Human Capital , 2004 .

[27]  D. Lubinski.  Introduction to the special section on cognitive abilities: 100 years after Spearman's (1904) "'General intelligence,' objectively determined and measured". , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Simon Baron-Cohen,et al.  The Essential Difference , 2003 .

[29]  Kurt A. Heller,et al.  International handbook of giftedness and talent , 2002 .

[30]  Jan B. Hansen.  Book Review: International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed.) , 2001 .

[31]  Ellen B. Mandinach,et al.  Remaking the Concept of Aptitude: Extending the Legacy of Richard E. Snow , 2001 .

[32]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Top 1 in 10,000: A 10-Year Follow-Up of the Profoundly Gifted , 2001 .

[33]  David Lubinski,et al.  Men and Women at Promise for Scientific Excellence: Similarity Not Dissimilarity , 2001, Psychological science.

[34]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Top 1 in 10,000: a 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[36]  David Lubinski,et al.  Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability at Age 13: Their Status 20 Years Later , 2000, Psychological science.

[37]  J. Stanley.  Helping students learn only what they don't already know. , 2000 .

[38]  D. Lubinski,et al.  States of excellence. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[39]  C. P. Snow,et al.  The two cultures , 2006, Nature.

[40]  Hendrik P. van Dalen,et al.  The Golden Age of Nobel Economists , 1999 .

[41]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. , 1999 .

[42]  M. Day,et al.  The road to excellence [human resource management] , 1999 .

[43]  S. Scarr.  How people make their own environments: Implications for parents and policy makers. , 1996 .

[44]  J. Stanley,et al.  INEQUITY IN EQUITY: How "Equity" Can Lead to Inequity for High-Potential Students , 1996 .

[45]  Acceleration among the Terman males: Correlates in midlife and after. , 1996 .

[46]  J. Stanley,et al.  Intellectual talent : psychometric and social issues , 1996 .

[47]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Multipotentiality among the intellectually gifted: "It was never there and already it's vanishing." , 1996 .

[48]  Charles Cox,et al.  The foundations of success , 1995 .

[49]  L. Cronbach,et al.  The Gifted Group in Later Maturity , 1995 .

[50]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Greatness: Who Makes History and Why , 1994 .

[51]  Peter Villanova,et al.  The criterion problem: 1917–1992. , 1992 .

[52]  Camilla Persson Benbow,et al.  Academic achievement in mathematics and science of students between ages 13 and 23: Are there differences among students in the top one percent of mathematical ability? , 1992 .

[53]  S. Scarr,et al.  Developmental theories for the 1990s: development and individual differences. , 1992, Child development.

[54]  J. Shurkin.  Terman's Kids: The Groundbreaking Study of How the Gifted Grow Up , 1992 .

[55]  Camilla Persson Benbow,et al.  Ten-year longitudinal follow-up of ability-matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students , 1991 .

[56]  C. Benbow,et al.  A 10-YEAR LONGITUDINAL FOLLOW-UP OF PARTICIPANTS IN A FAST-PACED MATHEMATICS COURSE , 1991 .

[57]  G. A. Davis,et al.  Handbook of Gifted Education , 1991 .

[58]  Linda E. Brody,et al.  Five Years of Early Entrants: Predicting Successful Achievement in College , 1990 .

[59]  A. Agresti.  An introduction to categorical data analysis , 1997 .

[60]  E. Jones,et al.  Practitioner Objections to the Academic Acceleration of Gifted Children , 1989 .

[61]  C. Benbow.  Some of the pathological assumptions in the sciences of gender , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[62]  L. Steen.  The Science of Patterns , 1988, Science.

[63]  L. Humphreys.  A conceptualization of intellectual giftedness. , 1985 .

[64]  James A. Kulik,et al.  Effects of Accelerated Instruction on Students , 1984 .

[65]  J. Stanley,et al.  Academic precocity, aspects of its development , 1983 .

[66]  H. Walberg,et al.  Matthew Effects in Education , 1983 .

[67]  J. Stanley,et al.  Educating Mathematically Precocious Youths: Twelve Policy Recommendations , 1982 .

[68]  H. R. Pitt,et al.  Women and the Mathematical Mystique , 1981 .

[69]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[70]  P. Meehl.  Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. , 1978 .

[71]  Robert B. Davis,et al.  The Gifted and the Creative: A Fifty-Year Perspective , 1977 .

[72]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions , 1977 .

[73]  J. Stanley.  The Case for Extreme Educational Acceleration of Intellectually Brilliant Youths , 1976 .

[74]  L. Aiken,et al.  Intellectual Talent: Research and Development , 1976 .

[75]  J. Stanley,et al.  Mathematical Talent: Discovery, Description, and Development (MT:D3) , 1975 .

[76]  L. Tyler,et al.  Individual differences : abilities and motivational directions , 1974 .

[77]  J. Stanley,et al.  Extreme Measures for the Exceptionally Gifted in Mathematics and Science , 1972 .

[78]  P. Witty.  The gifted child , 1972 .

[79]  Dael Lee Wolfle,et al.  The discovery of talent , 1969 .

[80]  L. Tyler.  The Work of the Counselor , 1969 .

[81]  D. Lykken.  Statistical significance in psychological research. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[82]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[83]  S. Pressey.  Fordling accelerates ten years after. , 1967 .

[84]  D. Price,et al.  Collaboration in an invisible college. , 1966, The American psychologist.

[85]  P. Vernon,et al.  ABILITY FACTORS AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES. , 1965, The American psychologist.

[86]  D. Price,et al.  The Scientific Foundations of Science Policy , 1965, Nature.

[87]  E. G. Williamson.  Vocational counseling : some historical, philosophical, and theoretical perspectives , 1965 .

[88]  D. W. Mackinnon,et al.  The nature and nurture of creative talent. , 1962 .

[89]  J. Stalnaker.  Recognizing and encouraging talent. , 1961 .

[90]  D. Wolfle.  Diversity of talent. , 1960 .

[91]  Uniqueness in students , 1960 .

[92]  J. Guilford.  Three faces of intellect. , 1959 .

[93]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[94]  N. Hobbs.  THE COMPLEAT COUNSELOR , 1958 .

[95]  K. Edward,et al.  Satisfactions and interests. , 1958 .

[96]  L. Cronbach.  The two disciplines of scientific psychology. , 1957 .

[97]  Donald G. Paterson.  The conservation of human talent. , 1957 .

[98]  C. Burt.  Inheritance of mental ability. , 1957, The Eugenics review.

[99]  D. Worcester.  The education of children of above-average mentality , 1956 .

[100]  P. Witty,et al.  Conserving Ability in the Sciences , 1955 .

[101]  S. Pressey,et al.  War-time accelerates ten years after. , 1955 .

[102]  L. Terman.  The discovery and encouragement of exceptional talent , 1954 .

[103]  H. Lehman.  Age and Achievement , 1953 .

[104]  L. Terman,et al.  The gifted child grows up , 1948 .

[105]  S L Pressey.  Acceleration: Disgrace or Challenge? , 1946, Science.

[106]  Pressey Sl.  Time-saving in professional training. , 1946 .

[107]  L. Hollingworth,et al.  Children above 180 I.Q. , 1944 .

[108]  M. Tinker.  Children Above 180 IQ. , 1943 .

[109]  K. Gehrkens.  Pioneering in Psychology , 1943 .

[110]  E. G. Williamson,et al.  How to Counsel Students , 1941 .

[111]  L. Hollingworth.  What We Know about the Early Selection and Training of Leaders , 1939 .

[112]  L. Terman.  The gifted student and his academic environment. , 1939 .

[113]  H. Taylor.  The Gifted Child and His Education , 1936 .

[114]  A. L. Lowell.  At war with academic traditions in America , 1935 .

[115]  H. Goddard.  The Gifted Child , 1933 .

[116]  C. Seashore.  Learning and living in college , 1927 .

[117]  J. F. Duff.  Genetic studies of genius. Vol. I. Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children , 1926 .

[118]  L. Terman.  Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children , 1926 .

[119]  L. Hollingworth.  Gifted children: Their nature and nurture. , 1926 .

[120]  C. Seashore.  THE GIFTED STUDENT AND RESEARCH. , 1922, Science.

[121]  H. V. Race.  A study of a class of children of superior intelligence. , 1918 .

[122]  C. Spearman.  General intelligence Objectively Determined and Measured , 1904 .