Correlating in Vitro and in Vivo Activities of Light-Inducible Dimers: A Cellular Optogenetics Guide.

Light-inducible dimers are powerful tools for cellular optogenetics, as they can be used to control the localization and activity of proteins with high spatial and temporal resolution. Despite the generality of the approach, application of light-inducible dimers is not always straightforward, as it is frequently necessary to test alternative dimer systems and fusion strategies before the desired biological activity is achieved. This process is further hindered by an incomplete understanding of the biophysical/biochemical mechanisms by which available dimers behave and how this correlates to in vivo function. To better inform the engineering process, we examined the biophysical and biochemical properties of three blue-light-inducible dimer variants (cryptochrome2 (CRY2)/CIB1, iLID/SspB, and LOVpep/ePDZb) and correlated these characteristics to in vivo colocalization and functional assays. We find that the switches vary dramatically in their dark and lit state binding affinities and that these affinities correlate with activity changes in a variety of in vivo assays, including transcription control, intracellular localization studies, and control of GTPase signaling. Additionally, for CRY2, we observe that light-induced changes in homo-oligomerization can have significant effects on activity that are sensitive to alternative fusion strategies.

[1]  C. Gersbach,et al.  A light-inducible CRISPR/Cas9 system for control of endogenous gene activation , 2015, Nature chemical biology.

[2]  Lukas C. Kapitein,et al.  Optogenetic control of organelle transport and positioning , 2015, Nature.

[3]  Brian Kuhlman,et al.  Engineering an improved light-induced dimer (iLID) for controlling the localization and activity of signaling proteins , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Justin D. Vrana,et al.  Benchmarking of Optical Dimerizer Systems , 2014, ACS synthetic biology.

[5]  Justin D. Vrana,et al.  An optimized optogenetic clustering tool for probing protein interaction and function , 2014, Nature Communications.

[6]  Won Do Heo,et al.  Reversible protein inactivation by optogenetic trapping in cells , 2014, Nature Methods.

[7]  S. Gerber,et al.  Optogenetic control of chemokine receptor signal and T-cell migration , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Josiah P. Zayner,et al.  Factors That Control the Chemistry of the LOV Domain Photocycle , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  K. Hahn,et al.  An optogenetic tool for the activation of endogenous diaphanous‐related formins induces thickening of stress fibers without an increase in contractility , 2013, Cytoskeleton.

[10]  Randall J. Platt,et al.  Optical Control of Mammalian Endogenous Transcription and Epigenetic States , 2013, Nature.

[11]  Lars-Oliver Essen,et al.  A LOV2 domain-based optogenetic tool to control protein degradation and cellular function. , 2013, Chemistry & biology.

[12]  Ravi S Kane,et al.  Optogenetic protein clustering and signaling activation in mammalian cells , 2013, Nature Methods.

[13]  R. M. Hughes,et al.  Light-mediated control of DNA transcription in yeast. , 2012, Methods.

[14]  Chentao Lin,et al.  Optogenetic Control of Transcription in Zebrafish , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  Brian Kuhlman,et al.  Designing photoswitchable peptides using the AsLOV2 domain. , 2012, Chemistry & biology.

[16]  Josiah P. Zayner,et al.  TULIPs: Tunable, light-controlled interacting protein tags for cell biology , 2012, Nature Methods.

[17]  M. Ehlers,et al.  Rapid blue light induction of protein interactions in living cells , 2010, Nature Methods.

[18]  R. Dolmetsch,et al.  Induction of protein-protein interactions in live cells using light , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Spatiotemporal Control of Cell Signalling Using A Light-Switchable Protein Interaction , 2009, Nature.

[20]  B. Kuhlman,et al.  A genetically-encoded photoactivatable Rac controls the motility of living cells , 2009, Nature.

[21]  Chentao Lin,et al.  Photoexcited CRY2 Interacts with CIB1 to Regulate Transcription and Floral Initiation in Arabidopsis , 2008, Science.

[22]  Anne J. Ridley,et al.  Mammalian Rho GTPases: new insights into their functions from in vivo studies , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[23]  J. Mymryk,et al.  An improved genetic system for detection and analysis of protein nuclear import signals , 2007, BMC Molecular Biology.

[24]  A. Sancar,et al.  Analysis of autophosphorylating kinase activities of Arabidopsis and human cryptochromes. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[25]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  C. Der,et al.  GEF means go: turning on RHO GTPases with guanine nucleotide-exchange factors , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[27]  E. Bamberg,et al.  Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Kevin H. Gardner,et al.  Structural Basis of a Phototropin Light Switch , 2003, Science.

[29]  E. Huq,et al.  A light-switchable gene promoter system , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[30]  S. Kay,et al.  Functional interaction of phytochrome B and cryptochrome 2 , 2000, Nature.

[31]  J. Christie,et al.  Photochemical and mutational analysis of the FMN-binding domains of the plant blue light receptor, phototropin. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[32]  James E Bear,et al.  Negative Regulation of Fibroblast Motility by Ena/VASP Proteins , 2000, Cell.

[33]  C. Nobes,et al.  Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia , 1995, Cell.

[34]  R. Schiestl,et al.  High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method , 2007, Nature Protocols.