Communication in social networks: Effects of kinship, network size, and emotional closeness

Communication is important in preventing social relationships from decaying over time. This study examined the effects of social network size, emotional closeness, and type of relationship (kinship vs. friendship) on communication patterns in the social networks of 251 women. Participants with large kin networks had longer times to last contact to both kin and friends. Participants with high levels of emotional closeness in their networks had shorter times to last contact. The effect of emotional closeness on time to last contact was greater for kin than for friends. These results demonstrate that time to last contact is closely tied to emotional closeness and suggest that the costs of maintaining kin relationships are lower than the costs of maintaining friendships.

[1]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  M. Kochen,et al.  Contacts and influence , 1978 .

[3]  C. Fischer.  What Do We Mean by 'Friend'? An Inductive Study* , 1982 .

[4]  M. Hammer,et al.  'Core' and 'extended' social networks in relation to health and illness. , 1983, Social science & medicine.

[5]  T. Huston,et al.  Developing close relationships: Changing patterns of interaction between pair members and social networks. , 1983 .

[6]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[7]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[8]  Harry T. Reis,et al.  Sex differences in the intimacy of social interaction: Further examination of potential explanations. , 1985 .

[9]  Peter Willmott,et al.  Friendship Networks and Social Support , 1987 .

[10]  M. Kenny.  The extent and function of parental attachment among first-year college students , 1987, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[11]  Kathryn McCannell.  Social networks and the transition to motherhood. , 1988 .

[12]  C. McCarty,et al.  COMPARING FOUR DIFFERENT METHODS FOR MEASURING PERSONAL SOCIAL NETWORKS , 1990 .

[13]  Laura Stafford,et al.  Idealization and Communication in Long-Distance Premarital Relationships. , 1990 .

[14]  B. Wellman,et al.  Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  A. Aron,et al.  Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness , 1992 .

[16]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The Personal is Social , 1992 .

[17]  K. Dindia,et al.  Definitions and Theoretical Perspectives on Maintaining Relationships , 1993 .

[18]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Social networks, support cliques, and kinship , 1995, Human nature.

[19]  David L. Morgan,et al.  The stability of core and peripheral networks over time , 1997 .

[20]  Barry Wellman,et al.  A decade of network change: Turnover, persistence and stability in personal communities☆ , 1997 .

[21]  Placing Friendship in Context: Contextualising friendship , 1999 .

[22]  Claudio Barbaranelli,et al.  Age differences in personality across the adult life span: parallels in five cultures. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[23]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Multilevel analysis of personal networks as dependent variables , 1999, Soc. Networks.

[24]  Z. Smoreda,et al.  Gender-specific use of the domestic telephone , 2000 .

[25]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Network Capital in a Multi-level World: Getting Support in Personal Communities , 2001 .

[26]  C. McCarty,et al.  Comparing Two Methods for Estimating Network Size , 2001 .

[27]  N. Nie.  Sociability, Interpersonal Relations, and the Internet , 2001 .

[28]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The quality of online social relationships , 2002, CACM.

[29]  L. Carstensen,et al.  Time counts: future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[30]  D. Oswald,et al.  Best friends forever?: High school best friendships and the transition to college , 2003 .

[31]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Social network size in humans , 2003, Human nature.

[32]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Discrete hierarchical organization of social group sizes , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  K. Donato,et al.  Counting on Kin: Social Networks, Social Support, and Child Health Status , 2005 .

[34]  J. Gill.  Hierarchical Linear Models , 2005 .

[35]  Fraser J. M. Reid,et al.  Textmates and Text Circles: Insights into the Social Ecology of SMS Text Messaging , 2005 .

[36]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Communication Technology and Friendship During the Transition From High School to College , 2006, Computers, Phones, and the Internet.

[37]  Matthew E. Brashears,et al.  Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades , 2006 .

[38]  Thomas V. Pollet,et al.  WHEN NIECES AND NEPHEWS BECOME IMPORTANT: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CHILDLESS WOMEN AND MOTHERS IN RELATIONSHIPS WITH NIECES AND NEPHEWS , 2006 .

[39]  Andrew F. Hayes,et al.  A Primer on Multilevel Modeling , 2006 .

[40]  Mark Schaller,et al.  Is friendship akin to kinship? , 2007, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[41]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Group size, grooming and social cohesion in primates , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  James Stiller,et al.  Perspective-taking and memory capacity predict social network size , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[43]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Did distance matter before the Internet?: Interpersonal contact and support in the 1970s , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[44]  Theo van Tilburg,et al.  Network contact changes in early and later postseparation years , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[45]  Barry Wellman,et al.  It's not who you know, it's how you know them: Who exchanges what with whom? , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[46]  M. Murphy.  Variations in Kinship Networks Across Geographic and Social Space , 2008 .

[47]  Steven W. Duck,et al.  Silver anniversary essay , 2008 .

[48]  Sam G. B. Roberts,et al.  Individual differences and personal social network size and structure. , 2008 .

[49]  Robin I. M. Dunbar.  Cognitive constraints on the structure and dynamics of social networks. , 2008 .

[50]  Thomas V. Pollet,et al.  Exploring variation in active network size: Constraints and ego characteristics , 2009, Soc. Networks.

[51]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[52]  S. Roberts.  Constraints on Social Networks , 2010 .