Soil signature simulation of complex mixtures and particle size distributions

Abstract. Soil reflectance signatures were modeled using the digital imaging and remote sensing image generation model and Blender three-dimensional (3-D) graphic design software. Using these tools, the geometry, radiometry, and chemistry of quartz and magnetite were exploited to model the presence of particle size and porosity effects in the visible and the shortwave infrared spectrum. Using the physics engines within the Blender 3-D graphic design software, physical representations of granular soil scenes were created. Each scene characterized a specific particle distribution and density. Chemical and optical properties of pure quartz and magnetite were assigned to particles in the scene based on particle size. This work presents a model to describe an observed phase-angle dependence of beach sand density. Bidirectional reflectance signatures were simulated for targets of varying size distribution and density. This model provides validation for a phenomenological trade space between density and particle size distribution in complex, heterogeneous soil mixtures. It also confirms the suggestion that directional reflectance signatures can be defined by intimate mixtures that depend on pore spacing. The study demonstrated that by combining realistic target geometry and spectral measurements of pure quartz and magnetite, effects of soil particle size and density could be modeled without functional data fitting or rigorous analysis of material dynamics. This research does not use traditional function-based models for simulation. The combination of realistic geometry, physically viable particle structure, and first-principles ray-tracing enables the ability to represent signature changes that have been observed in experimental observations.

[1]  J. Salisbury,et al.  The role of volume scattering in reducing spectral contrast of reststrahlen bands in spectra of powdered minerals , 1992 .

[2]  Michael I. Mishchenko,et al.  Numerically exact computer simulations of light scattering by densely packed, random particulate media , 2011 .

[3]  Arnon Karnieli,et al.  A hemispherical-directional reflectance model as a tool for understanding image distinctions between cultivated and uncultivated bare surfaces , 2004 .

[4]  C. Bacour,et al.  Variability of biome reflectance directional signatures as seen by POLDER , 2005 .

[5]  Michael D. King,et al.  BRDF Analysis of Savanna Vegetation and Salt-Pan Samples , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Jerzy Cierniewski,et al.  Furrow Microrelief Influence on the Directional Hyperspectral Reflectance of Soil at Various Illumination and Observation Conditions , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Edwin M. Winter,et al.  Infrared Measurements of Pristine and Disturbed Soils 1. Spectral Contrast Differences between Field and Laboratory Data , 1998 .

[8]  K. Torrance,et al.  Theory for off-specular reflection from roughened surfaces , 1967 .

[9]  Duccio Rocchini,et al.  Theory of Reflectance and Emittance Spectroscopy , 2008 .

[10]  Jerzy Cierniewski,et al.  Influence of soil surface roughness on soil bidirectional reflectance , 1997 .

[11]  S. J. Sutley,et al.  USGS Digital Spectral Library splib06a , 2007 .

[12]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  A comprehensive physical model for light reflection , 1991, SIGGRAPH.

[13]  Sanna Kaasalainen,et al.  Laboratory photometry of planetary regolith analogs - II. Surface roughness and extremes of packing density , 2004 .

[14]  J. Demattê,et al.  Soil density evaluated by spectral reflectance as an evidence of compaction effects , 2010 .

[15]  Michael I. Mishchenko,et al.  Scattering of electromagnetic waves by ensembles of particles and discrete random media , 2011 .

[16]  永井 豊 海外文献紹介 Optical Engineering , 1998 .

[17]  F. E. Nicodemus,et al.  Geometrical considerations and nomenclature for reflectance , 1977 .

[18]  Fabrizio Capaccioni,et al.  Phase curves of meteorites and terrestrial rocks: laboratory measurements and applications to asteroids , 1990 .

[19]  Jeffrey Edward Moersch,et al.  Thermal emission from particulate surfaces : a comparison of scattering models with measured spectra , 1995 .

[20]  A. Lacis,et al.  Multiple Scattering of Light by Particles: Radiative Transfer and Coherent Backscattering , 2006 .

[21]  W. Rushton Review Lecture. Pigments and signals in colour vision , 1972 .

[22]  Michael I. Mishchenko,et al.  Bidirectional Reflectance of Flat, Optically Thick Particulate Layers: An Efficient Radiative Transfer Solution and Applications to Snow and Soil Surfaces , 1999 .

[23]  B. Hapke Bidirectional reflectance spectroscopy 7: The single particle phase function hockey stick relation , 2012 .

[24]  S. Kaasalainen Laboratory photometry of planetary regolith analogs: I. Effects of grain and packing properties on opposition effect , 2003 .

[25]  Charles M. Bachmann,et al.  Phase angle dependence of sand density observable in hyperspectral reflectance , 2014 .

[26]  Craig A. Coburn,et al.  Assessment of soil surface BRDF using an imaging spectrometer , 2010, Remote Sensing.

[27]  J. Beard,et al.  Bidirectional Reflectance Model Validation and Utilization. , 1973 .

[28]  Paul Helfenstein,et al.  A laboratory study of the bidirectional reflectance from particulate samples , 2011 .

[29]  W. David Miller,et al.  Retrieval of Substrate Bearing Strength from Hyperspectral Imagery during the Virginia Coast Reserve (VCR’07) Multi-Sensor Campaign , 2010 .