The Impact of External Quality Assurance of Costs Estimates on Cost Overruns: Empirical Evidence from the Norwegian Road Sector

Cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects are prevalent and have been well documented in the literature; see, for instance, Flyvbjerg et al. (2003), Odeck (2004 and 2014) and Cantarelli et al. (2010). Governments may therefore exert efforts to reduce overruns by implementing strategies such as quality assurance of cost estimates, whereby external consultants are engaged to assure the accuracy of estimates. However, the literature has to a lesser extent provided evidence on what governments do to combat overruns and whether those efforts work in practice. This paper provides such evidence for the case of Norway, where the government implemented a quality assurance regime for cost estimates above 500 million NOK in the early 2000. Apart from explaining the Norwegian quality assurance regime, the paper uses statistical inferences to compare the magnitudes of cost overruns in the pre-and post- quality assurance periods. The statistically significant derived results are as follows: (i) quality assurance has led to a reduction in cost overruns; (ii) quality assurance has not, however, led to improved accuracy of the estimates provided by the authorities – rather, it has led to systematic overestimation by the authorities; and (iii) external consultants are more accurate than the authorities. We conclude that the quality assurance regime is achieving the objectives of reducing cost overruns and that similar regimes should be considered for smaller projects where overruns have been shown to be very large.

[1]  Ole Morten Magnussen,et al.  Comparative analysis of cost estimates of major public investment projects , 2006 .

[2]  D. Pickrell A Desire Named Streetcar Fantasy and Fact in Rail Transit Planning , 1992 .

[3]  Cost overruns Risk Analysis in Transportation Infrastructure Investments , 2007 .

[4]  James Odeck Do reforms reduce the magnitudes of cost overruns in road projects? Statistical evidence from Norway , 2014 .

[5]  Martin Wachs,et al.  Forecasts in urban transportation planning: Uses, methods, and dilemmas , 1987 .

[6]  Knut Samset,et al.  Investing for Impact. Lessons with the Norwegian State Project Model and the first ivvestment projects that have been subjected to external quality assurance , 2013 .

[7]  Bent Flyvbjerg,et al.  Cost Overruns and Demand Shortfalls in Urban Rail and Other Infrastructure , 2007, 1303.7402.

[8]  Polona Tominc,et al.  A cost performance analysis of transport infrastructure construction in Slovenia , 2012 .

[9]  Peter W. G. Morris,et al.  The Anatomy of Major Projects , 1987 .

[10]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Forecasting methods and applications. , 1979 .

[11]  B. Wee Large Infrastructure Projects: A Review of the Quality of Demand Forecasts and Cost Estimations , 2007 .

[12]  John Preston,et al.  Twenty-one sources of error and bias in transport project appraisal , 1998 .

[13]  Bent Flyvbjerg,et al.  Policy and Planning for Large-Infrastructure Projects: Problems, Causes, Cures , 2005, 1303.7400.

[14]  James Odeck,et al.  Cost overruns in road construction--what are their sizes and determinants? , 2004 .

[15]  Bent Flyvbjerg,et al.  Cost Overruns in Large-Scale Transportation Infrastructure Projects: Explanations and Their Theoretical Embeddedness , 2010, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[16]  Søren L. Buhl,et al.  How common and how large are cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects? , 2003 .

[17]  T. Sager,et al.  The Political Relevance of Planners’ Analysis: The Case of a Parliamentary Standing Committee , 2005 .

[18]  Matti Siemiatycki,et al.  Academics and Auditors , 2009 .

[19]  William White,et al.  A Proposal , 2008, Moon, Sun, and Witches.

[20]  Investing for Impact , 2017 .

[21]  Bent Flyvbjerg,et al.  Quality Control and Due Diligence in Project Management: Getting Decisions Right by Taking the Outside View , 2013, 1302.2544.