Current challenges of Germany’s energy transition project and competing strategies of challengers and incumbents: The case of direct marketing of electricity from renewable energy sources

Electricity generated by renewable energies (RES-E) already accounts for 25% of Germany’s electricity supply. This has led to recent discussions for a better market integration of RES-E. The paper examines how competing actors and their ideas on market integration developed new services for direct marketing according to their respective origins and tried to shape the regulatory framework. The paper analyses this process and explains the current shape of the field of direct marketing. Medium-sized structured actors, who favoured RES-E integration via the conventional wholesale power markets, and who formed early close coalitions with RES-E power producers at the same time, have been most successful in terms of market shares. Moreover, they have been very successful for different reasons in building-up coalitions with governance units and influencing the field rules and routines. Based on those findings, the paper will conclude with some policy advices for the future adjustment of the current regulative frameworks. As long as there is no evidence of how RES-E can be integrated most effectively and efficiently, policies should maintain a competition between different direct marketing strategies to find out which strategies serve the best in terms of achieving a successful energy transition.

[1]  P. Hall Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences: ALIGNING ONTOLOGY AND METHODOLOGY IN COMPARATIVE POLITICS , 2003 .

[2]  Bernd Hirschl,et al.  Erneuerbare Energien-Politik : eine Multi-Level Policy-Analyse mit Fokus auf den deutschen Strommarkt , 2008 .

[3]  S. Wassermann,et al.  Picking a winner? : innovation in photovoltaics and the political creation of niche markets , 2009 .

[4]  Renate Mayntz,et al.  The Development of Large Technical Systems , 2008 .

[5]  Arie Rip,et al.  Technological Change , 2019, World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains.

[6]  D. Mcadam,et al.  A Theory of Fields , 2012 .

[7]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology , 2006 .

[8]  Kristina Nienhaus,et al.  Analyse von Rahmenbedingungen für die Integration erneuerbarer Energien in die Strommärkte auf der Basis agentenbasierter Simulation , 2011 .

[9]  Mario Richter Business model innovation for sustainable energy: German utilities and renewable energy , 2013 .

[10]  Massimo Genoese,et al.  Energiewirtschaftliche Analysen des deutschen Strommarkts mit agentenbasierter Simulation , 2010 .

[11]  M. Saguan,et al.  Large-scale wind power in European electricity markets: Time for revisiting support schemes and market designs? , 2010 .

[12]  G. Brunekreeft,et al.  How to deal with negative power price spikes?--Flexible voluntary curtailment agreements for large-scale integration of wind , 2010 .

[13]  Wolfgang Hauser,et al.  Weiterentwicklung eines agentenbasierten Simulationsmodells(AMIRIS) zur Untersuchung des Akteursverhaltens beider Marktintegration von Strom aus Erneuerbaren Energienunter verschiedenen Fördermechanismen - Kurzfassung , 2013 .

[14]  F. Geels The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms , 2011 .

[15]  F. Geels Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective , 2010 .

[16]  Sheri Berman Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences , 2007, Perspectives on Politics.

[17]  Gpj Geert Verbong Die Geschichte der Windenergienutzung, 1890-1990 , 1997 .

[18]  Matthias Reeg Entwurf eines ganzheitlichen Strommarktdesigns für hohe Anteile erneuerbarer Energien - Flexibilität statt reiner Kapazität. , 2014 .

[19]  D. Mcadam,et al.  Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields* , 2010 .

[20]  P. Pearson,et al.  The socio-technical transition of distributed electricity storage into future networks - System value and stakeholder views , 2012 .

[21]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[22]  J. Meadowcroft,et al.  The journey towards decarbonization: Exploring socio-technical transitions in the electricity sector in the province of Ontario (1885–2013) and potential low-carbon pathways , 2014 .

[23]  S. Rayner,et al.  Human choice and climate change , 1998 .

[24]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2005 .

[25]  F. Geels Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[26]  Till Stenzel,et al.  Regulating technological change—The strategic reactions of utility companies towards subsidy policies in the German, Spanish and UK electricity markets , 2008 .

[27]  Alexandra Purkus,et al.  Promoting the market and system integration of renewable energies through premium schemes—A case study of the German market premium , 2013 .

[28]  Hermann Scheer,et al.  Energy Autonomy: The Economic, Social and Technological Case for Renewable Energy , 2006 .

[29]  Gert Brunekreeft,et al.  Regulation, Competition and Investment in the German Electricity Market: RegTP or REGTP , 2005 .

[30]  F. Geels From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .