Delivering community benefits through REDD+: Lessons from Joint Forest Management in Zambia

In implementing reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD), significant attention is being paid to ensuring that communities stand to benefit. Safeguards to protect local people's rights and interests have been formulated in response concerns over the potential negative impact on communities of forest preservation. To fulfil safeguards, many sub-Saharan African countries are looking to community-based natural resource management (CBNRM). Current critiques of CBNRM projects outline the importance of project design and policy context in shaping whether or not communities actually stand to benefit. This paper explores these aspects in a case study of Joint Forest Management (JFM) in Zambia, and examines the role of Zambia's REDD preparedness programme in shaping them. The case study was evaluated using stakeholder and policy document analyses, informed by interviews, and tied into the broader forest governance network. The findings highlight the way in which the politics and policies of forest governance in Zambia shape the on-the-ground JFM project and influence community benefits. In the case studied, even with careful local-level project design, JFM would be hindered in its delivery of REDD safeguards. Therefore, for REDD to deliver community safeguards, it must be considered as a broader process of political and governance change.

[1]  L. Stringer,et al.  Lessons from community-based payment for ecosystem service schemes: from forests to rangelands , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  W. Adams,et al.  Back to the Barriers? Changing Narratives in Biodiversity Conservation , 2005 .

[3]  Gudeta W. Sileshi,et al.  The miombo woodlands at the cross roads: Potential threats, sustainable livelihoods, policy gaps and challenges , 2009 .

[4]  A. Dougill,et al.  Contribution of forest provisioning ecosystem services to rural livelihoods in Copperbelt’s Miombo woodlands, Zambia , 2012 .

[5]  Anil Graves,et al.  Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  K. Schreckenberg,et al.  Examining equity: a multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services , 2013 .

[7]  Robert Chambers,et al.  Rapid rural appraisal: rationale and repertoire , 1981 .

[8]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[9]  T. Sunderland,et al.  Getting REDD to work locally: lessons learned from integrated conservation and development projects , 2010 .

[10]  L. Stringer,et al.  Advancing climate compatible development: lessons from southern Africa , 2014, Regional Environmental Change.

[11]  C. Leeuwis,et al.  Trust and hidden conflict in participatory natural resources management: The case of the Pendjari national park (PNP) in Benin , 2013 .

[12]  C. Kumar.  Perceptions of incentives for participation: insights from joint forest management in India , 2007 .

[13]  J. Lund,et al.  Curse or blessing? Local elites in Joint Forest Management in India’s Shiwaliks , 2010 .

[14]  J. Teye.  Analysing forest resource governance in Africa: Proposition for an integrated policy network model , 2013 .

[15]  Frederick D. Barnhart,et al.  Challenges in the Commons , 2015 .

[16]  W. Neil Adger,et al.  ADVANCING A POLITICAL ECOLOGY OF GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL DISCOURSES , 2001 .

[17]  M. Murphree.  The strategic pillars of communal natural resource management: benefit, empowerment and conservation , 2009, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[18]  E. Chidumayo,et al.  SHIFTING CULTIVATION, EDIBLE CATERPILLARS AND LIVELIHOODS IN THE KOPA AREA OF NORTHERN ZAMBIA , 2002 .

[19]  G. Sileshi,et al.  Opportunity for conserving and utilizing agrobiodiversity through agroforestry in Southern Africa , 2008 .

[20]  C. Harvey,et al.  Opportunities for achieving biodiversity conservation through REDD , 2010 .

[21]  M. Phiri,et al.  Local community perception of joint forest management and its implications for forest condition: the case of Dambwa Forest Reserve in southern Zambia , 2012 .

[22]  T. Bassett,et al.  The REDD menace: Resurgent protectionism in Tanzania's mangrove forests , 2012 .

[23]  B. B. Umar,et al.  Send Orders of Reprints at Reprints@benthamscience.org Joint Forest Management in Katanino, Zambia: Inappropriate Property Regime Change? , 2022 .

[24]  A. Angelsen,et al.  From Subsistence to Safety Nets and Cash Income: Exploring the Diverse Values of Non-timber Forest Products for Livelihoods and Poverty Alleviation , 2011 .

[25]  Janaki R.R. Alavalapati,et al.  Perceptions of collective action and its success in community based natural resource management: An empirical analysis , 2006 .

[26]  P. Blaikie,et al.  Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and Botswana by , 2003 .

[27]  B. Nkhata,et al.  Performance of community-based natural resource governance for the Kafue Flats (Zambia) , 2010, Environmental Conservation.

[28]  B. Campbell,et al.  Devolution and community-based natural resource management: creating space for local people to participate and benefit? , 2002 .

[29]  Travis Reynolds,et al.  Institutional Determinants of Success Among Forestry-Based Carbon Sequestration Projects in Sub-Saharan Africa , 2012 .

[30]  M. Phiri.  Evaluation of the Performance of Joint Forest Management (JFM) Programme: Case of Dambwa Forest Reserve in Livingstone District, Zambia , 2009 .

[31]  Edward R. Carr,et al.  Seeing REDD+ as a Project of Environmental Governance , 2011 .

[32]  B. Cashore,et al.  Trade-offs, co-benefits and safeguards: Current debates on the breadth of REDD+. , 2012 .

[33]  R. Pirard,et al.  Agriculture and Deforestation: Is REDD+ Rooted In Evidence? , 2012 .

[34]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Does REDD+ Threaten to Recentralize Forest Governance? , 2010, Science.

[35]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  The commons in the new millennium : challenges and adaptation , 2003 .