Can the operating limits of biogas plants operated under non-isothermal conditions be defined with certainty? Modeling self-optimizing attainable regions

Abstract Uncertainty in operating parameters such as temperature undermines the reliability of using kinetic models in performance projections for plants operated under ambient non-isothermal conditions. This study develops a theoretical framework, which uses process kinetics, uncertainty quantification to define robust operating limits known as self-optimizing attainable regions, where by instead of defining a very large operating limit, which will be achieved some of the times for some of the reactor configurations, we define a self-optimizing limit, which will be achieved all the times for all possible reactor configurations (despite variations in temperature). Using a temperature range of 20 – 60∘C, , the results indicate that decreasing temperature uncertainty, increasing process temperature or using a multistage digester structure increases the self-optimizing operating limits: 1.53 × 10 − 4 , 4.95 × 10 − 4 and 6.32 × 10 − 4 ( g / L ) 2 obtained for temperatures of 20.00, 31.60 and 52.40∘C respectively. The findings highly important in defining performance targets especially when there is uncertainty in environmental conditions.

[1]  D. Glasser,et al.  The attainable region and optimal reactor structures , 1990 .

[2]  Tushar Kanti Sen,et al.  The performance enhancements of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors for domestic sludge treatment--a state-of-the-art review. , 2012, Water research.

[3]  P. Weiland,et al.  The Start-Up, Operation and Monitoring of High-Rate Anaerobic Treatment Systems: Discusser's Report , 1991 .

[4]  G Ruiz-Filippi,et al.  Explicit temperature-based model for anaerobic digestion: application in domestic wastewater treatment in a UASB reactor. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[5]  Gatze Lettinga,et al.  UASB Process design for various types of wastewaters. , 1991 .

[6]  S. Pavlostathis,et al.  Kinetics of anaerobic treatment: A critical review , 1991 .

[7]  D. Glasser,et al.  Geometry of the Attainable Region Generated by Reaction and Mixing: With and without Constraints , 1990 .

[8]  Glen T. Daigger,et al.  Biological wastewater treatment. , 2011 .

[9]  Diane Hildebrandt,et al.  Application of attainable region theory to batch reactors , 2013 .

[10]  Diane Hildebrandt,et al.  Attainable Region Theory: An Introduction to Choosing an Optimal Reactor , 2016 .

[11]  W. Kuo,et al.  Treatment of kitchen waste using a mobile thermophilic anaerobic digestion system , 2010 .

[12]  Christian Brecher,et al.  Self-optimizing Production Systems☆ , 2016 .

[13]  Razak Seidu,et al.  Biodigester rapid analysis and design system (B-RADeS): A candidate attainable region-based simulator for the synthesis of biogas reactor structures , 2020, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[14]  Takashi Yamaguchi,et al.  Feasibility study of a pilot-scale sewage treatment system combining an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) and an aerated fixed bed (AFB) reactor at ambient temperature. , 2007, Bioresource technology.

[15]  Germán Aroca,et al.  Attainable region analysis for continuous production of second generation bioethanol , 2013, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[16]  Wei Liao,et al.  A self-sustaining high-strength wastewater treatment system using solar-bio-hybrid power generation. , 2017, Bioresource technology.

[17]  Razak Seidu,et al.  Attainable regions and fuzzy multi-criteria decisions: Modeling a novel configuration of methane bioreactor using experimental limits of operation. , 2019, Bioresource technology.

[18]  Grietje Zeeman,et al.  Anaerobic sewage treatment in a one-stage UASB reactor and a combined UASB-Digester system. , 2004, Water research.

[19]  G. Nakhla,et al.  Single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion of extruded lignocellulosic biomass , 2016 .

[20]  Dong-Hoon Kim,et al.  Effect of operation temperature on anaerobic digestion of food waste: Performance and microbial analysis , 2017 .

[21]  Yung-Tse Hung,et al.  Biosolids Treatment Processes , 2007 .

[22]  Razak Seidu,et al.  Simulation of two-dimensional attainable regions and its application to model digester structures for maximum stability of anaerobic treatment process. , 2019, Water research.

[23]  Andreas Schmidt,et al.  Towards a Design Methodology for Self-optimizing Systems , 2006 .

[24]  Hiroshi Tsuno,et al.  Co-digestion of polylactide and kitchen garbage in hyperthermophilic and thermophilic continuous anaerobic process. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[25]  Satoshi Okabe,et al.  Anaerobic treatment of municipal wastewater at ambient temperature: Analysis of archaeal community structure and recovery of dissolved methane. , 2012, Water research.

[26]  Anwar Ahmad,et al.  Effect of temperature and organic loading rate on upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor and CH4 production by treating liquidized food waste , 2012 .

[27]  B C Anderson,et al.  Biogas production performance of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion with fat, oil, and grease in semi-continuous flow digesters: effects of temperature, hydraulic retention time, and organic loading rate , 2013, Environmental technology.

[28]  Yen Wah Tong,et al.  Three-stage anaerobic digester for food waste , 2017 .

[29]  Razak Seidu,et al.  Self-optimizing attainable regions of the anaerobic treatment process: Modeling performance targets under kinetic uncertainty. , 2019, Water research.

[30]  Sylvia Gildemyn,et al.  Interfacing anaerobic digestion with (bio)electrochemical systems: Potentials and challenges. , 2018, Water research.

[31]  Razak Seidu,et al.  Use of attainable regions for synthesis and optimization of multistage anaerobic digesters , 2019, Applied Energy.

[32]  A. N. Stokes,et al.  Model for bacterial culture growth rate throughout the entire biokinetic temperature range , 1983, Journal of bacteriology.

[33]  D. T. Hill Simplified monod kinetics of methane fermentation of animal wastes , 1983 .

[34]  Lide Chen,et al.  Comparison on batch anaerobic digestion of five different livestock manures and prediction of biochemical methane potential (BMP) using different statistical models. , 2016, Waste management.

[35]  Jose M. Pinto,et al.  Optimal synthesis of anaerobic digester networks , 2009 .

[36]  Rune Bakke,et al.  Modeling temperature effects in anaerobic digestion of domestic wastewater , 2018, Water-Energy Nexus.

[37]  Makarand M. Ghangrekar,et al.  Experience with UASB reactor start-up under different operating conditions , 1996 .

[38]  D. Massé,et al.  Impact of organic loading rate on the performance of psychrophilic dry anaerobic digestion of dairy manure and wheat straw: long-term operation. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[39]  Diane Hildebrandt,et al.  Experimental Simulation of Three-Dimensional Attainable Region for the Synthesis of Exothermic Reversible Reaction: Ethyl Acetate Synthesis Case Study , 2015 .