Tinkering with “Failure”: Equity, Learning, and the Iterative Design Process

This paper attempts to reframe popular notions of “failure” as recently celebrated in the Maker Movement, Silicon Valley, and beyond. Building on Vossoughi et al.’s 2013 FabLearn publication describing how a focus on iterations/drafts can serve as an equity-oriented pedagogical move in afterschool tinkering contexts, we explore what it means for afterschool youth and educators to persist through unexpected challenges when using an iterative design process in their tinkering projects. More specifically, this paper describes: 1) how young women in a program geared toward increasing equitable access to quality science, technology, and engineering education for girls underrepresented in the field (Techbridge) make sense of their tinkering experiences while persisting through challenges in the iterative design process, 2) which pedagogical moves both Techbridge girls and educators value when persisting through frustrations, 3) what iterative design learning looks like in the afterschool program, and 4) how supporting iterative design processes over end-products can redefine notions of STEM ability and intelligence by inviting diverse learners into activities they find meaningful.

[1]  S. Turkle,et al.  Epistemological Pluralism: Styles and Voices within the Computer Culture , 1990, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[2]  Kim Lane,et al.  Creating Innovators: The Making of Young People Who Will Change the World , 2014 .

[3]  Gary S. Stager,et al.  Invent To Learn: Making, Tinkering, and Engineering in the Classroom , 2013 .

[4]  K. Peppler,et al.  From SuperGoo to Scratch: exploring creative digital media production in informal learning , 2007 .

[5]  Mike Petrich,et al.  It Looks Like Fun, but Are They Learning? , 2013 .

[6]  Paulo Blikstein,et al.  Digital Fabrication and Making' in Education: The Democratization of Invention , 2013 .

[7]  Mike Petrich,et al.  Learning Through STEM-Rich Tinkering: Findings From a Jointly Negotiated Research Project Taken Up in Practice , 2015 .

[8]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[9]  Angela L. Duckworth,et al.  Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Joshua P. Gutwill,et al.  Research to Practice: Observing Learning in Tinkering Activities , 2015 .

[11]  M. Resnick,et al.  Designing for Tinkerability , 2013 .

[12]  Dale Dougherty,et al.  The Maker Mindset , 2013 .

[13]  C. Dweck Mindset: The New Psychology of Success , 2006 .

[14]  University of California-Davis,et al.  The Promise of the Maker Movement for Education , 2017 .

[15]  I. Her Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture, in: The interpretation of cultures: selected essays . New-York/N.Y./USA etc , 2022 .

[16]  Paula Hooper,et al.  Tinkering , Learning & Equity in the After-School Setting , 2013 .

[17]  R. Linn,et al.  Qualitative methods in research on teaching , 1985 .

[18]  Barry Fishman,et al.  Large‐scale science education intervention research we can use , 2012 .