Variation and prediction of membrane fouling index under various feed water characteristics

Membrane fouling index such as silt density index (SDI) and modified fouling index (MFI) is an important parameter in design of the integrated RO (reverse osmosis) and NF (nanofiltration) membrane processes for drinking water treatment. In this study, the effect of various foulant characteristics on membrane fouling index was investigated systematically. As expected, the fouling index (both SDI and MFI) increased with increasing particle concentration. When organic matter was the primary cause of membrane fouling, the MFI based on cake filtration theory was not accurately measured due to internal fouling such as pore adsorption. The fouling index was determined mainly by particle characteristics when both particulate and organic foulants coexisted in the feed water. This observation was attributed to lessening of organic pore adsorption by particle cake layer formed on the membrane surface. Prediction of MFI by using Happel cell model for the hydraulic resistance of the particle cake layer was also performed. The effect of primary model parameters including particle size (ap) and particle concentration (C0), were accurately assessed without any fitting parameters, and the MFI values predicted by the model exhibited very good agreement with the experimental results.

[1]  Jaeweon Cho,et al.  Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: factors and mechanisms affecting rejection and flux decline with charged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane , 2000 .

[2]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Cake-enhanced concentration polarization: a new fouling mechanism for salt-rejecting membranes. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Kinetics of Permeate Flux Decline in Crossflow Membrane Filtration of Colloidal Suspensions. , 1997, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[4]  A. Mongruel,et al.  Prediction of the rate of cross-flow membrane ultrafiltration: A colloidal interaction approach , 1996 .

[5]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Combined influence of natural organic matter (NOM) and colloidal particles on nanofiltration membrane fouling , 2005 .

[6]  Roger Ben Aim,et al.  Improving the measurement of the Modified Fouling Index using nanofiltration membranes (NF-MFI) , 2006 .

[7]  Lianfa Song,et al.  The development of membrane fouling in full-scale RO processes , 2004 .

[8]  M. Clark,et al.  Adsorption of aquatic humic substances on hydrophobic ultrafiltration membranes , 1994 .

[9]  J. C. Schippers,et al.  The modified fouling index, a method of determining the fouling characteristics of water , 1980 .

[10]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of Crossflow Membrane Filter Geometry and Shear Rate on Colloidal Fouling in Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Separations , 2002 .

[11]  Maria D. Kennedy,et al.  Applications of the MFI-UF to measure and predict particulate fouling in RO systems , 2003 .

[12]  R. Field,et al.  Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling , 1995 .

[13]  Seymour S. Kremen,et al.  Silt density indices (SDI), percent plugging factor (%PF): their relation to actual foulant deposition , 1998 .

[14]  W. P. Ball,et al.  NANOFILTRATION OF NATURAL ORGANIC MATTER: pH AND IONIC STRENGTH EFFECTS , 1997 .

[15]  Johannes S. Vrouwenvelder,et al.  Tools for fouling diagnosis of NF and RO membranes and assessment of the fouling potential of feed water , 2003 .

[16]  How Yong Ng,et al.  Influence of colloidal fouling on rejection of trace organic contaminants by reverse osmosis , 2004 .

[17]  Lianfa Song Flux decline in crossflow microfiltration and ultrafiltration: mechanisms and modeling of membrane fouling , 1998 .

[18]  Gary Amy,et al.  Characterizing algogenic organic matter (AOM) and evaluating associated NF membrane fouling. , 2004, Water research.

[19]  A. Fane,et al.  The influence of polydispersity on the hydraulic behaviour of colloidal fouling layers on membranes , 1998 .

[20]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes , 1997 .

[21]  Gurdev Singh,et al.  Influence of various monovalent cations and calcium ion on the colloidal fouling potential. , 2005, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[22]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Colloidal Fouling of Reverse Osmosis Membranes: Measurements and Fouling Mechanisms , 1997 .

[23]  Maria D. Kennedy,et al.  The modified fouling index using ultrafiltration membranes (MFI-UF): characterisation, filtration mechanisms and proposed reference membrane , 2002 .

[24]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  Fouling in tangential-flow ultrafiltration : the effect of colloid size and coagulation pretreatment , 1990 .

[25]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes , 2001 .

[26]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Theory of concentration polarization in crossflow filtration , 1995 .