Comodulation masking release for three types of modulator as a function of modulation rate

To investigate the dependence of 'Comodulation Masking Release' (CMR) on the type and frequency of modulator, thresholds were measured for a 4-kHz tone masked by modulated and unmodulated noises. The maskers were a 400-Hz wide band of noise centered on 4 kHz (NOCUE), the same noise with a 2700-Hz lowpass noise added (LPCUE), and a wideband noise with a passband between 3 and 6 kHz (WBCUE). In each condition three types of modulator were used: a square wave, a sinewave, and a lowpass noise. Several frequencies of each type of modulator were used, allowing measurement of the interaction between envelope frequency (fe) and modulator type. Thresholds were lower in the presence than in the absence of modulation for all modulator types, except when fe was high (e.g. 100 Hz). The 'Modulated-Unmodulated Difference' (MUD) decreased monotonically with increasing fe in all conditions. For any given fe, MUDs generally were greater for square-wave and lowpass-noise modulation than for sinusoidal modulation. As significant MUDs were sometimes obtained even in the NOCUE condition, the MUD was not an accurate measure of CMR. Therefore, CMR was defined as the difference between the MUD obtained in the NOCUE condition and that obtained in each cue condition, for each combination of fe and modulator type. Measured this way, the CMR for our 4-kHz signals did not vary systemically with fc over the range studied. When a CMR was obtained it was smaller for sinusoidal modulation than for either square-wave or lowpass-noise modulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  Robert P. Carlyon,et al.  Peripheral and central components of comodulation masking release , 1985 .

[2]  B C Moore,et al.  Gap detection as a function of frequency, bandwidth, and level. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  B. Moore,et al.  Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  S. Buus,et al.  Measurements of equal loudness and reaction times , 1982 .

[5]  P. Fitzgibbons,et al.  Temporal gap detection in noise as a function of frequency, bandwidth, and level. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  H. Hake,et al.  On the Masking Pattern of a Simple Auditory Stimulus , 1950 .

[7]  Mary Florentine,et al.  Gap Detection in Normal and Impaired Listeners: The Effect of Level and Frequency , 1985 .

[8]  E D Schubert,et al.  Influence of place synchrony on detection of a sinusoid. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  J. R. Trinder,et al.  Hardware-software configuration for high performance digital filtering in real-time , 1982, ICASSP.

[10]  Joseph W. Hall,et al.  Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  J. Hall,et al.  The effect of across-frequency differences in masking level on spectro-temporal pattern analysis. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Das Ohr als Nachrichtenempfänger , 1967 .

[14]  S Buus,et al.  Release from masking caused by envelope fluctuations. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  D. McFadden,et al.  Comodulation masking release: effects of varying the level, duration, and time delay of the cue band. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  L. Elfner,et al.  Continuity in alternately sounded tonal signals in a free field. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  B C Moore,et al.  Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.