Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography Angiography in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Treated With Endovascular Repair: Evaluation of Optimal Timing of Delayed Phase Imaging for the Detection of Low-Flow Endoleaks

Purpose: To evaluate the optimal timing of delayed phase imaging for detecting low-flow endoleaks. Materials and Methods: Fifty-eight patients with unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular repair underwent 1- and 6-month follow-up multidetector row computed tomography (CT) performed during unenhanced, arterial, and delayed phase. At 6-month follow-up, delayed phase imaging, focused on stent graft, was performed with a delay of 60 (early delayed enhanced phase) and 300 seconds (late delayed enhanced phase) after intravenous injection of 120 mL of iodinated nonionic contrast medium (iomeprol 300 mgI/mL, Iomeron), at a flow rate of 3 mL/s via an antecubital vein, with a detector-row configuration of 4 × 1-mm, a 1.25-mm slice width, and a pitch of 6. Six-month follow-up CT images were independently evaluated by 2 readers during 2 different reading sessions: sets A (unenhanced, arterial, and early delayed phase images) and B (unenhanced, arterial, and late delayed phase images). Sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of both reading sessions were compared. The standard of reference was represented by the combined evaluation of 1- and 6-month CT scans. Results: At standard of reference, 24 of 58 patients had an endoleak classified as type 1 in 2 cases, type 2 in 21 cases, and type 3 in the last 1 case. Seven of 21 type 2 endoleaks were classified as low-flow endoleaks. Set A reading session, including early delayed enhanced phase, allowed the detection of 19 of 24 endoleaks (5 false-negative cases represented by low-flow endoleaks), whereas all endoleaks were detected during set B reading session, including late delayed enhanced phase. Differences between sets A and B in terms of sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusions: For optimal multidetector CT detection of low-flow endoleaks in patients who underwent endovascular repair, delayed phase should be acquired 300 seconds after injection of contrast medium.

[1]  L. Bonomo,et al.  Multidetector CT in abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular repair: are unenhanced and delayed phase enhanced images effective for endoleak detection? , 2006, Radiology.

[2]  M. Macari,et al.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm: can the arterial phase at CT evaluation after endovascular repair be eliminated to reduce radiation dose? , 2006, Radiology.

[3]  Jafar Golzarian,et al.  Endoleakage after endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: diagnosis, significance and treatment , 2006, European Radiology.

[4]  C. Bartolozzi,et al.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm: contrast-enhanced US for missed endoleaks after endoluminal repair. , 2004, Radiology.

[5]  N. Obuchowski Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. , 2003, Radiology.

[6]  S. Stavropoulos,et al.  Endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2003, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[7]  F. Veith,et al.  Detection of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of unenhanced and delayed helical CT acquisitions. , 2003, Radiology.

[8]  Rodney A. White,et al.  Nature and significance of endoleaks and endotension: summary of opinions expressed at an international conference. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[9]  S. Rao Vallabhaneni,et al.  Lessons learnt from the EUROSTAR registry on endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. , 2001, European journal of radiology.

[10]  L. Reilly,et al.  Analysis of initial CT findings after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2001, Radiology.

[11]  G. White,et al.  Endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms - state of the art. , 2001, European journal of radiology.

[12]  D. Fleischmann,et al.  Accuracy of Predicting and Controlling Time-Dependent Aortic Enhancement from a Test Bolus Injection , 2001, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  M. Makaroun,et al.  Is proximal aortic neck dilatation after endovascular aneurysm exclusion a cause for concern? , 2001, Journal of vascular surgery.

[14]  Rodney A. White,et al.  Endoleak as a predictor of outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair: AneuRx multicenter clinical trial. , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[15]  H. Brambs,et al.  Leakages after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms: classification based on findings at CT, angiography, and radiography. , 1999, Radiology.

[16]  D. Gould,et al.  Endotension after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Definition, Classification, and Strategies for Surveillance and Intervention , 1999, Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery.

[17]  G. White,et al.  Endotension: An Explanation for Continued AAA Growth after Successful Endoluminal Repair , 1999, Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery.

[18]  P. Harris,et al.  Realistic expectations for patients with stent-graft treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Results of a European multicentre registry. , 1999, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[19]  D. Gould,et al.  Longitudinal Aneurysm Shrinkage following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Source of Intermediate and Late Complications , 1999, Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery.

[20]  James May,et al.  Type III and Type IV Endoleak: Toward a Complete Definition of Blood Flow in the Sac after Endoluminal AAA Repair , 1998, Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery.

[21]  P. Gevenois,et al.  Helical CT of aorta after endoluminal stent-graft therapy: value of biphasic acquisition. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  T. Hölzenbein,et al.  Spiral CT angiography in the assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms after stent grafting: value of maximum intensity projections. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[23]  J. May,et al.  Endoleak as a Complication of Endoluminal Grafting of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Classification, Incidence, Diagnosis, and Management , 1997, Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery.

[24]  J. Struyven,et al.  Endovascular aortic stent-grafts: transcatheter embolization of persistent perigraft leaks. , 1997, Radiology.

[25]  F. Veith,et al.  Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of postoperative follow-up with helical CT. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  R. Allen,et al.  Delayed rupture of aortic aneurysms following endovascular stent grafting. , 1995, American journal of surgery.

[27]  Bernard R. Rosner,et al.  Fundamentals of Biostatistics. , 1992 .

[28]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[29]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[30]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  J. Golzarian Delayed helical CT acquisition in the detection of endoleak. , 2004, Radiology.