The CARES: a generic measure of health-related quality of life for patients with cancer

In spite of the prevalence of neoplastic disorders as a cause of chronic illness, very few of the currently available generic measures of health-related quality of life or health status have been utilized with cancer patients. In this paper we reviewed our studies with the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System (CARES), a cancer-specific measure of rehabilitation needs and quality of life. We present data to demonstrate that the CARES is a generic measure of health-related quality of life, suitable for use in the many different diseases called cancer. The data that form the basis for this paper were collected during a decade of research on the CARES. This paper represents the first discussion of the performance of the CARES across separate cancer sites and phases of the disease. In addition, we demonstrated that the CARES is responsive to changes in health-related quality of life over time. Finally, we will discuss the application of the CARES in clinical and research settings.

[1]  A. Stewart,et al.  Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. , 1989, JAMA.

[2]  Michael G. Akritas,et al.  Limitations of the Rank Transform Procedure: A Study of Repeated Measures Designs, Part I , 1991 .

[3]  R. Heinrich,et al.  Development of a comprehensive quality of life measurement tool: CARES. , 1990, Oncology.

[4]  P. Ganz,et al.  Breast conservation versus mastectomy. Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery? , 1992, Cancer.

[5]  J. J. Higgins,et al.  Limitations of the rank transform statistic in tests for interactions , 1987 .

[6]  R. Iman,et al.  Rank Transformations as a Bridge between Parametric and Nonparametric Statistics , 1981 .

[7]  P. Ganz,et al.  A Comprehensive Approach to the Assessment of Cancer Patients' Rehabilitation Needs , 1987 .

[8]  T. Tong,et al.  Cancer statistics, 1991. , 1991, Boletin de la Asociacion Medica de Puerto Rico.

[9]  P. Ganz,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative assessment of a case management program for cancer patients. , 1991, Health & social work.

[10]  E. Lusk,et al.  Psychosocial status in chronic illness. A comparative analysis of six diagnostic groups. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  P. Ganz,et al.  Assessing the quality of life--a study in newly-diagnosed breast cancer patients. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  P. Ganz,et al.  Assessing problems of cancer patients: psychometric properties of the cancer inventory of problem situations. , 1990, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[13]  J. Brisson,et al.  Psychological distress after initial treatment for breast cancer: a comparison of partial and total mastectomy. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[14]  W. Wolberg,et al.  Psychosexual adaptation to breast cancer surgery , 1989, Cancer.

[15]  P. Ganz,et al.  Cancer Inventory of Problem Situations , 1993 .

[16]  L. Fallowfield,et al.  Psychological outcome of treatment for early breast cancer: A review , 1989 .

[17]  P. Ganz,et al.  CAncer rehabilitation evaluation system–short form (CARES‐SF). A cancer specific rehabilitation and quality of life instrument , 1991, Cancer.

[18]  William H. Rogers,et al.  Functional Status and Well-Being of Patients with Chronic Conditions , 1989 .