Assessing the welfare impact of foot disorders in dairy cattle by a modeling approach.

Foot disorders are the main cause of dairy cow lameness and are considered to have a major impact on the welfare of dairy cattle. This study adopts a modeling approach, using a dynamic stochastic model, to provide more insight into the welfare impact of different types of foot disorders, both clinical and subclinical. The impact of specific foot disorders on welfare was assessed by simulating the incidence and duration of foot disorders and the pain associated with them. Pain assessment was based on locomotion scores, with underlying knowledge obtained from scientific literature and experts. The results demonstrated the seriousness of the welfare impact of foot disorders. The negative welfare impact was measured on a scale from 0 to 60, where the maximum outcome represents a cow having very severe pain during the whole year. On average, each cow achieves a welfare impact score of 12, which is 20% of the maximum welfare impact score. This welfare score equals having severe pain for a period of 3 months, indicating a serious impact on welfare. On average, digital dermatitis impacts most on welfare, which is caused by a high incidence of the painful clinical stage, followed by sole hemorrhages (SoH) and interdigital dermatitis and heel horn erosion (IDHE). The combination of a high incidence and long duration of SoH and IDHE causes this relatively high welfare impact of foot disorders that occur mostly subclinically. On average, over 1 year, 46% of the welfare impact due to foot disorders is caused by clinical foot disorders. The fact that subclinical foot disorders contribute more or less equally to the effects on welfare as clinical ones, indicates that farmers may readily underestimate the welfare impact by a factor two. Modeling welfare impact at cow level, individual cases of foot disorders, stresses the importance of pain intensity, indicating the importance of clinical foot disorders. This study demonstrated the serious welfare impact of foot disorders in dairy cattle and pointed out the considerable impact of subclinical foot disorders. Furthermore, the approach of welfare assessment, for example herd v. cow level, influenced the ranking of foot disorders for their impact on animal welfare. Potentially, this leads to different prioritization of specific solution strategies for dairy farmers, for example, focusing on cow comfort, hygiene or preventive medical treatments, foot trimming and/or health monitoring. The findings in this study support in raising awareness about this welfare issue.

[1]  A. Nolan,et al.  Assessment of pain and welfare in sheep , 2006 .

[2]  W M Sischo,et al.  Effect of rubber flooring on claw health in lactating dairy cows housed in free-stall barns. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  C. Risco,et al.  Effect of lameness on ovarian activity in postpartum holstein cows. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  H. Erb,et al.  Visual locomotion scoring in the first seventy days in milk: impact on pregnancy and survival. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  D. Weary,et al.  Analgesics improve the gait of lame dairy cattle. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  E N Noordhuizen-Stassen,et al.  Prevalence of claw disorders in Dutch dairy cows exposed to several floor systems. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  D. Broom,et al.  The Effects of Lameness on Social and Individual Behavior of Dairy Cows , 2002 .

[8]  F. Stafleu,et al.  A Simple Value-Distinction Approach Aids Transparency in Farm Animal Welfare Debate , 2006 .

[9]  D M Weary,et al.  Invited review: The welfare of dairy cattle--key concepts and the role of science. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  C. Winckler,et al.  The Reliability and Repeatability of a Lameness Scoring System for Use as an Indicator of Welfare in Dairy Cattle , 2001 .

[11]  T. Knowles,et al.  The development, implementation and testing of a lameness control programme based on HACCP principles and designed for heifers on dairy farms. , 2009, Veterinary journal.

[12]  D. Weary,et al.  A Scientific Conception of Animal Welfare that Reflects Ethical Concerns , 1997, Animal Welfare.

[13]  F. Hart LOCOMOTOR DISORDERS , 1960 .

[14]  A. Bach,et al.  Associations between lameness and production, feeding and milking attendance of Holstein cows milked with an automatic milking system , 2006, Journal of Dairy Research.

[15]  J. Routly,et al.  Lameness, activity time-budgets, and estrus expression in dairy cattle. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  H. Whay,et al.  Associations between locomotion, claw lesions and nociceptive threshold in dairy heifers during the peri-partum period. , 1997, Veterinary journal.

[17]  W. Schouten,et al.  The effect of digital lesions and floor type on locomotion score in Dutch dairy cows. , 2009, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[18]  S. Brotherstone,et al.  Risk factors and milk yield losses associated with lameness in Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle. , 2008, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[19]  K. Frankena,et al.  Herd- and cow-level prevalence of digital dermatitis in the Netherlands and associated risk factors. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  C. Lischer,et al.  [Healing process of uncomplicated sole ulcers in dairy cows kept in tie stalls: clinical description and blood chemical investigations]. , 2001, Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde.

[21]  Marian Stamp Dawkins,et al.  Behaviour as a tool in the assessment of animal welfare. , 2003, Zoology.

[22]  Terry L. Whiting,et al.  Understanding Animal Welfare: The Science in its Cultural Context , 2011 .

[23]  F. Manson,et al.  The influence of concentrate amount on locomotion and clinical lameness in dairy cattle , 1988 .

[24]  D. Ariely Combining experiences over time: the effects of duration, intensity changes and on‐line measurements on retrospective pain evaluations , 1998 .

[25]  A. Macrae,et al.  Disposal and disease rates in British dairy herds between April 1998 and March 2002 , 2004, Veterinary Record.

[26]  D M Weary,et al.  Gait assessment in dairy cattle. , 2009, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[27]  J. Rushen,et al.  Effects of roughness and compressibility of flooring on cow locomotion. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[28]  D. Fraser Animal ethics and animal welfare science: bridging the two cultures 1 It is great honour to give thi , 1999 .

[29]  L. Green,et al.  A longitudinal field trial of the effect of biotin on lameness in dairy cows. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[30]  P. Roqueplo Entre savoir et décision, l'expertise scientifique , 1997 .

[31]  H Hogeveen,et al.  Assessing economic consequences of foot disorders in dairy cattle using a dynamic stochastic simulation model. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[32]  A. Donovan,et al.  The association between lameness, ovarian cysts and fertility in lactating dairy cows. , 2003, Theriogenology.

[33]  Donald M. Broom,et al.  Animal welfare defined in terms of attempts to cope with the environment , 1996 .

[34]  F. Manson,et al.  Incidence and prevalence of lameness in dairy cattle , 1996, Veterinary Record.

[35]  J. Sørensen,et al.  A study of duration of digital dermatitis lesions after treatment in a Danish dairy herd , 2009, Acta veterinaria Scandinavica.

[36]  Bahman Shafii,et al.  Effect of clinical mastitis and other diseases on reproductive performance of Holstein cows. , 2009, Animal reproduction science.

[37]  D. Broom Quality of life means welfare: how is it related to other concepts and assessed? , 2007, Animal Welfare.

[38]  Marian Stamp Dawkins,et al.  Animal Suffering: The Science Of Animal Welfare , 1980 .