Improving Safety and Mobility at High-Speed Intersections with Innovations in Sensor Technology

A series of innovations has been made in the vehicle sensors field. Technologies such as IntelliDrive and radar-based smart sensors make it possible to track each vehicle in proximity to an intersection. However, current technologies have limitations, such as lack of robustness, accuracy, or level of penetration. This paper assumes an accurate wide-area detector (WAD), which might be soon available, and highlights the potential benefits that might be derived in safety and efficiency of operations at high-speed intersections from the deployment of the WAD. Two critical areas in which wide-area detection can lead to significant improvements are discussed: (a) location of crash risk on onset of yellow and (b) location of vehicles on onset of yellow. A case study was conducted at an instrumented intersection in Noblesville, Indiana, to estimate potential improvement from the use of an ideally operating WAD and green extension logic for signal control. Findings revealed that the replacement of the single loop detector sensor with a WAD sensor would lead to an additional 1.4 vehicles being served per lane on the cross street per unit vehicle provided with dilemma zone protection on the highspeed approach. Results also showed that speed traps should be used only after accounting for the trade-off between safety and efficiency and the traffic control logic. When speed traps were designed with generic dilemma zone boundaries at the Noblesville site, the dilemma zone protection was provided only 57% of the time because vehicles accelerated or decelerated after passing the speed trap.

[1]  F Davidsson,et al.  SOS - SELF OPTIMISING SIGNAL CONTROL: DEVELOPMENT AND FIELD TRIALS OF THE SOS ALGORITHM FOR SELF OPTIMIZING SIGNAL CONTROL AT ISOLATED INTERSECTIONS , 1997 .

[2]  Yosef Sheffi,et al.  A Model of Driver Behavior at High Speed Signalized Intersections , 1981 .

[3]  Peter S Parsonson,et al.  USE OF EC-DC DETECTOR FOR SIGNALIZATION OF HIGH-SPEED INTERSECTIONS , 1979 .

[4]  Robert C. Deen,et al.  GREEN-EXTENSION SYSTEMS AT HIGH-SPEED INTERSECTIONS , 1978 .

[5]  Darcy M. Bullock,et al.  Recasting Dilemma Zone Design as a Marginal Cost–Benefit Problem , 2007 .

[6]  Paul L. Olson,et al.  DRIVER RESPONSE TO AMBER PHASE OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS , 1961 .

[7]  F. V. Webster,et al.  Traffic signals for high-speed roads , 1965 .

[8]  David A Noyce,et al.  Analysis of Driver Behavior in Dilemma Zones at Signalized Intersections , 2007 .

[9]  Montasir M Abbas,et al.  INTELLIGENT DETECTION-CONTROL SYSTEM FOR RURAL SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS , 2002 .

[10]  P S Parsonson,et al.  SMALL-AREA DETECTION AT INTERSECTION APPROACHES , 1974 .

[11]  Panagiotis Papaioannou,et al.  Driver behaviour, dilemma zone and safety effects at urban signalized intersections in Greece. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Akimasa Fujiwara,et al.  Analysis of Stopping Behavior at Urban Signalized Intersections , 2008 .

[13]  Myung-Soon Chang,et al.  TIMING TRAFFIC SIGNAL CHANGE INTERVALS BASED ON DRIVER BEHAVIOR , 1985 .

[14]  Darcy M. Bullock,et al.  Limitations of Simultaneous Gap-Out Logic , 2006 .

[15]  Robert L Bleyl.  SPEED PROFILES APPROACHING A TRAFFIC SIGNAL , 1972 .

[16]  May,et al.  CLEARANCE INTERVAL AT TRAFFIC SIGNALS , 1968 .

[17]  Robert Herman,et al.  The Problem of the Amber Signal Light in Traffic Flow , 1960 .

[18]  Darcy M. Bullock,et al.  Estimating dilemma zone hazard function at high speed isolated intersection , 2011 .

[19]  P S Parsonson,et al.  VEHICLE DETECTOR PLACEMENT FOR HIGH-SPEED, ISOLATED TRAFFIC-ACTUATED INTERSECTION CONTROL. VOLUME I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY , 1977 .

[20]  Patrick T McCoy,et al.  TRAFFIC DETECTOR DESIGN AND EVALUATION GUIDELINES. FINAL REPORT , 1994 .