Changes in publication languages and citation practices and their effect on the scientific impact of Russian science (1993-2010)

This article analyzes the effects of publication language on the international scientific visibility of Russia using the Web of Science (WoS). Like other developing and transition countries, it is subject to a growing pressure to “internationalize” its scientific activities, which primarily means a shift to English as a language of scientific communication. But to what extent does the transition to English improve the impact of research? The case of Russia is of interest in this respect as the existence of many combinations of national journals and languages of publications (namely, Russian and English, including translated journals) provide a kind of natural I experiment to test the effects of language and publisher's country on the international visibility of research through citations as well as on the referencing practices of authors. Our analysis points to the conclusion that the production of original English-language papers in foreign journals is a more efficient strategy of internationalization than the mere translation of domestic journals. If the objective of a country is to maximize the international visibility of its scientific work, then the efforts should go into the promotion of publication in reputed English-language journals to profit from the added effect provided by the Matthew effect of these venues. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Vladimir Pislyakov,et al.  Citation expectations: are they realized? Study of the Matthew index for Russian papers published abroad , 2009, Scientometrics.

[2]  Theresa Lillis,et al.  The geolinguistics of English as an academic lingua franca: citation practices across English‐medium national and English‐medium international journals , 2010 .

[3]  Dorothy Williams,et al.  Publishing in international journals , 2007, Scientometrics.

[4]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  There are neither "king" nor "crown" in scientometrics: Comments on a supposed "alternative" method of normalization , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[5]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications , 1995, Scientometrics.

[6]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  The impact factor's Matthew Effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS ("Leiden") evaluations of research performance , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[8]  Yves Gingras,et al.  Les sciences sociales françaises entre ancrage local et visibilité internationale* , 2010, European Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Tony Dale,et al.  Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and 'Periphery Effects' in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995-2000 , 2003, Scientometrics.

[10]  Michael Snow,et al.  Cover to Cover , 1975 .

[11]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact , 1986, Scientometrics.

[12]  Michel Zitt,et al.  The Transition from "National" to "Transnational" Model and Related Measures of Countries' Performance , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[13]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Differences in the construction of sci based bibliometric indicators among various producers: A first over view , 1996, Scientometrics.

[14]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Correcting glasses help fair comparisons in international science landscape: Country indicators as a function of ISI database delineation , 2003, Scientometrics.

[15]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  Analysis of the structure of international scientific cooperation networks through bibliometric indicators , 1999, Scientometrics.

[16]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance , 2001, Scientometrics.

[17]  Pandelis Perakakis,et al.  Measuring internationality: Reflections and perspectives on academic journals , 2006, Scientometrics.

[18]  Shuhua Wang,et al.  Bibliometric analysis of English-language academic journals of China and their internationalization , 2007, Scientometrics.

[19]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Severe language effect in university rankings: particularly Germany and France are wronged in citation-based rankings , 2010, Scientometrics.