Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy can differentiate high grade and low grade prostatic carcinoma

Prostate tumors are graded by the revised Gleason Score (GS) which is the sum of the two predominant Gleason grades present ranging from 6-10. GS 6 cancer exclusively with Gleason grade 3 is designated as low grade (LG) and correlates with better clinical prognosis for patients. GS >7 cancer with at least one of the Gleason grades 4 and 5 is designated as HG indicate worse prognosis for patients. Current transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies often fail to correctly diagnose HG prostate cancer due to sampling errors. Diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) of biological tissue depend on tissue morphology and architecture. Thus, DRS could potentially differentiate between HG and LG prostatic carcinoma. A 15-gauge optical biopsy needle was prototyped to take prostate biopsies after measuring DRS with a laboratory fluorometer. This needle has an optical sensor that utilizes 8×100 μm optical fibers for tissue excitation and a single 200 μm central optical fiber to measure DRS. Tissue biopsy cores were obtained from 20 surgically excised prostates using this needle after measuring DRS at 5 nm intervals between 500-700 nm wavelengths. Tissue within a measurement window was histopathologically classified as either benign, LG, or HG and correlated with DRS. Partial least square analysis of DRS identified principal components (PC) as potential classifiers. Statistically significant PCs (p<;0.05) were tested for their ability to classify biopsy tissue using support vector machine and leave-one-out cross validation method. There were 29 HG and 49 LG cancers among 187 biopsy cores included in the study. Study results show 76% sensitivity, 80% specificity, 93% negative predictive value, and 50% positive predictive value for HG versus benign, and 76%, 73%, 84%, and 63%, for HG versus LG prostate tissue classification. DRS failed to diagnose 7/29 (24%) HG cancers. This study demonstrated that an optical biopsy needle guided by DRS has sufficient accuracy to differentiate HG from LG carcinoma and benign tissue. It may allow precise targeting of HG prostate cancer providing more accurate assessment of the disease and improvement in patient care.

[1]  P. Perimenis,et al.  Clinical and pathological variables that predict changes in tumour grade after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer. , 2012, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[2]  Alan W Partin,et al.  Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system , 2013, BJU international.

[3]  E. Sevick-Muraca,et al.  Quantitative optical spectroscopy for tissue diagnosis. , 1996, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[4]  J. Epstein An update of the Gleason grading system. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[5]  Michael McCormack,et al.  Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology. , 2006 .

[6]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2016 , 2016, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[7]  Hanli Liu,et al.  Prostate cancer detection using combined auto-fluorescence and light reflectance spectroscopy: ex vivo study of human prostates. , 2014, Biomedical optics express.

[8]  D. Gleason,et al.  PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA BY COMBINED HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND CLINICAL STAGING , 2017, The Journal of urology.

[9]  U. Patel,et al.  Current status of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2006, Clinical radiology.

[10]  Jennifer L. Beebe-Dimmer,et al.  Prognostic Gleason grade grouping : data based on the modified Gleason scoring system , 2013 .

[11]  I. Bigio,et al.  Comparison of elastic scattering spectroscopy with histology in ex vivo prostate glands: potential application for optically guided biopsy and directed treatment , 2013, Lasers in Medical Science.

[12]  Herbert Lepor,et al.  Gleason 6 prostate cancer: serious malignancy or toothless lion? , 2014, Oncology.

[13]  Michael McCormack,et al.  Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology. , 2006, European urology.

[14]  Rebecca L. Siegel Mph,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2016 , 2016 .

[15]  M. Scott Lucia,et al.  Systematic diagnosis of prostate cancer using an optical biopsy needle adjunct with fluorescence spectroscopy , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.