New finite difference formulations for general inhomogeneous anisotropic bioelectric problems

Due to its low computational complexity, finite difference modeling offers a viable tool for studying bioelectric problems, allowing the field behaviour to be observed easily as different system parameters are varied. Previous finite difference formulations, however, have been limited mainly to systems in which the conductivity is orthotropic, i.e., a strictly diagonal conductivity tensor. This in turn has limited the effectiveness of the finite difference technique in modeling complex anatomies with arbitrarily anisotropic conductivities, e.g., detailed fiber structures of muscles where the fiber can lie in any arbitrary direction. Here, the authors present both two-dimensional and three dimensional finite difference formulations that are valid for structures with an inhomogeneous and nondiagonal conductivity tensor. A data parallel computer, the connection machine CM-5, is used in the finite difference implementation to provide the computational power and memory for solving large problems. The finite difference grid is mapped effectively to the CM-5 by associating a group of nodes with one processor. Details on the new approach and its data parallel implementation are presented together with validation and computational performance results. In addition, an application of the new formulation in providing the potential distribution inside a canine torso during electrical defibrillation is demonstrated.

[1]  R. Patterson,et al.  Multiple sources of the impedance cardiogram based on 3-D finite difference human thorax models , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  P. Basser,et al.  MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[3]  R. Patterson,et al.  Thoracic current pathways for different size and position external deflibrillation electrodes based on a 3D model , 1993, Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Societ.

[4]  Menahem Friedman Fundamentals of Computer Numerical Analysis , 1993 .

[5]  Stephen J. Hahn A flexible, interactive finite difference system for modeling defibrillation shock fields , 1992, Proceedings Computers in Cardiology.

[6]  Robert P Patterson,et al.  Finite difference model of thoracic fields and current flow due to surface applied defibrillation voltages , 1992, Proceedings Computers in Cardiology.

[7]  F. J. Asencor,et al.  Finite-difference operators in anisotropic inhomogeneous dielectrics: general case , 1991 .

[8]  P. Hunter,et al.  Mathematical model of geometry and fibrous structure of the heart. , 1991, The American journal of physiology.

[9]  J. G. Webster,et al.  Impedance of Skeletal Muscle from 1 Hz to 1 MHz , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  N. Mullineux,et al.  Solution of parabolic partial differential equations , 1981 .

[11]  G. Smith,et al.  Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations: Finite Difference Methods , 1978 .

[12]  M. Panizo,et al.  Finite‐difference operators in inhomogeneous anisotropic media , 1977 .

[13]  S. Rush,et al.  Resistivity of Body Tissues at Low Frequencies , 1963, Circulation research.

[14]  E. M. Lifshitz,et al.  Electrodynamics of continuous media , 1961 .

[15]  M. Hestenes,et al.  Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems , 1952 .