IFM target 2.0: an innovative method to define reliability target for prototype systems

The success of a mission, in general terms of functionality of a complex system, is based on the probability that failure events do not happen during the mission. Therefore, a preliminary reliability analysis and consequently the definition of the reliability target are required. The reliability target of the whole system can be an input or output data of the reliability study; consequently, the reliability values of components are respectively output or input data. If we start from the definition of the target of the system (input data), considering similar ones (if available, especially for innovative ones!), we can allocate the reliability of each component (output data). The choice of the most suitable allocation technique is not a simple task, advantages and disadvantages are discussed in literature. Instead, if we start from the characteristics of the units available (input data), studying the structure (links in series and parallel), it is possible to calculate the reliability target of the whole system. However, these values could be not completely available (innovative systems) or refer to units with not comparable levels in terms of technology, complexity, safety and so on. In the manuscript, a new method is proposed to define the reliability target: Integrated Factors Method 2.0 (IFM 2.0). The purpose will be to combine the advantages of both above approaches. IFM 2.0 is an upgrade of IFM that was developed in 2002 by Falcone et al. The new methodology combines the old IFM method with new maintenance factors. Thanks to IFM 2.0, it is possible to estimate the reliability target of a system in a more confident way: “IFM Target 2.0.” The proposed method has been validated and applied to two complex systems. The obtained results show the effectiveness of the new method and its capability to overcome the problems of other previous methods.

[1]  Fabio De Felice,et al.  A-IFM reliability allocation model based on multicriteria approach , 2016 .

[2]  M. Tucci,et al.  Accelerated life tests as an integrated methodology for product design, qualification and production control: a case study in household appliances , 2014 .

[3]  J. A. Boyd Allocation of reliability requirements: a new approach , 1992, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1992 Proceedings.

[4]  R T Anderson Reliability Design Handbook , 1976 .

[5]  M. O'Hagan,et al.  Aggregating Template Or Rule Antecedents In Real-time Expert Systems With Fuzzy Set Logic , 1988, Twenty-Second Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[6]  Om Prakash Yadav,et al.  Reliability demonstration test planning: A three dimensional consideration , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  Fabio De Felice,et al.  VALIDATION AND APPLICATION OF A RELIABILITY ALLOCATION TECHNIQUE (ADVANCED INTEGRATED FACTORS METHOD) TO AN INDUSTRIAL SYSTEM , 2014 .

[8]  Om Prakash Yadav,et al.  System reliability allocation methodology based on three-dimensional analyses , 2007 .

[9]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Mcdm Aggregation Model Using Situational Me-OWA and Me-Owga Operators , 2006, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[10]  Yung-Chia Chang,et al.  ME-OWA based DEMATEL reliability apportionment method , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Om Prakash Yadav,et al.  A practical reliability allocation method considering modified criticality factors , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Reliability assessment of an aircraft propulsion system using IFS and OWA tree , 2008 .

[13]  Yung-Chia Chang,et al.  Innovative reliability allocation using the maximal entropy ordered weighted averaging method , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[14]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[15]  Robert Fullér,et al.  An Analytic Approach for Obtaining Maximal Entropy Owa Operator Weights , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[16]  Alessandro Silvestri,et al.  Reliability Target Assessment Based on Integrated Factors Method (IFM): A Real Case Study of a Sintering Plant , 2016, Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention.

[17]  Alessandro Silvestri,et al.  Critical Flow Method: A New Reliability Allocation Approach for a Thermonuclear System , 2016, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[18]  K. Smedley Reliability analysis for LEB ring magnet power system in SSC , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[19]  Ming Jian Zuo,et al.  A new reliability allocation weight for reducing the occurrence of severe failure effects , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[20]  S. Dai,et al.  Reliability analysis in engineering applications , 1992 .

[21]  Om Prakash Yadav,et al.  System Reliability Allocation based on FMEA Criticality , 2009 .