DDM at Work: Reply to comments on "Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages".

We provide responses to the commentaries in this volume to evaluate, clarify and extend some of the arguments in Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages. Evidences show that DDM (dependency distance minimization) is an important linguistic universal, biologically or cognitively motivated, in shaping the language system. As a general tendency, DDM works quite well in theoretical argumentations as well as practical applications. However, this does not mean that DDM is the only linguistic universal that works: it is highly possible that other factors, which might be biologically, physically, socially or culturally motivated, work as well to jointly mold languages.

[1]  Jingqi Yan,et al.  Revisiting syntactic development in deaf and hearing children from a dependency approach: Comment on "Dependency distance: a new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages" by Haitao Liu et al. , 2017, Physics of life reviews.

[2]  Haitao Liu,et al.  Dependency Distance as a Metric of Language Comprehension Difficulty , 2008 .

[3]  Jingyang Jiang,et al.  Dependency distance: A new perspective on the syntactic development in second language acquisition: Comment on "Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural language" by Haitao Liu et al. , 2017, Physics of life reviews.

[4]  Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez On the relation between dependency distance, crossing dependencies, and parsing. Comment on "Dependency distance: a new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages" by Haitao Liu et al , 2017, Physics of life reviews.

[5]  Haitao Liu,et al.  Quantitative typological analysis of Romance languages , 2012 .

[6]  Richard Hudson Cross-language diversity, head-direction and grammars: Comment on "Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages" by Haitao Liu et al. , 2017, Physics of life reviews.

[7]  Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho,et al.  Crossings as a side effect of dependency lengths , 2015, Complex..

[8]  Yiyi Zhao Dependency distance minimization in understanding of ambiguous structure: Comment on "Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages" by Haitao Liu et al. , 2017, Physics of life reviews.

[9]  Haitao Liu,et al.  Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages. , 2017, Physics of life reviews.

[10]  Anat Ninio,et al.  Projectivity is the mathematical code of syntax: Comment on "Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages" by Haitao Liu et al. , 2017, Physics of life reviews.

[11]  Haitao Liu,et al.  Can chunking reduce syntactic complexity of natural languages? , 2016, Complex..

[12]  Haitao Liu,et al.  The effects of sentence length on dependency distance, dependency direction and the implications–Based on a parallel English–Chinese dependency treebank , 2015 .

[13]  Roger Levy,et al.  Noisy-context surprisal as a human sentence processing cost model , 2017, EACL.

[14]  Roger Levy,et al.  Generalizing dependency distance: Comment on "Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages" by Haitao Liu et al. , 2017, Physics of life reviews.

[15]  Qian Lu Computer simulation as an important approach to explore language universal: Comment on "Dependency distance: a new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages" by Haitao Liu et al. , 2017, Physics of life reviews.

[16]  Haitao Liu,et al.  Language is more a human-driven system than a semiotic system: Comment on "Modelling language evolution: Examples and predictions" by Tao Gong, Shuai Lan, Menghan Zhang. , 2014, Physics of life reviews.

[17]  Lin Wang Dependency distances in natural mixed languages: Comment on "Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages" by Haitao Liu et al. , 2017, Physics of life reviews.

[18]  Thomas Givon,et al.  The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Ontogeny, Neuro-Cognition, Evolution , 2009 .

[19]  Phillipp Meister,et al.  Advanced Synergetics Instability Hierarchies Of Self Organizing Systems And Devices , 2016 .

[20]  E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[21]  Richard Futrell,et al.  Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Xinying Chen,et al.  Dependency distance in language evolution: Comment on "Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages" by Haitao Liu et al. , 2017, Physics of life reviews.

[23]  Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho,et al.  Towards a theory of word order. Comment on "Dependency distance: a new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural language" by Haitao Liu et al , 2017, Physics of life reviews.

[24]  Yaqin Wang Dependency distance distribution - from the perspective of genre variation: Comment on "Dependency distance: a new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages" by Haitao Liu et al. , 2017, Physics of life reviews.

[25]  Yingqi Jing Coevolution of dependency distance, hierarchical structure and word order: Comment on "Dependency distance: a new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages" by Haitao Liu et al. , 2017, Physics of life reviews.

[26]  Wenwen Li Cross-language dependency treebank-An effective approach for contrastive study of languages: Comment on "Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages" by Haitao Liu et al. , 2017, Physics of life reviews.

[27]  Shravan Vasishth,et al.  Planned experiments and corpus based research play a complementary role: Comment on "Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages" by Haitao Liu et al. , 2017, Physics of life reviews.