Viscoelasticity of cross-linked actin networks: experimental tests, mechanical modeling and finite-element analysis.

Filamentous actin is one of the main constituents of the eukaryotic cytoskeleton. The actin cortex, a densely cross-linked network, resides underneath the lipid bilayer. In the present work we propose a continuum mechanical formulation for describing the viscoelastic properties of in vitro actin networks, which serve as model systems for the cortex, by including the microstructure, i.e. the behavior of a single filament and its spatial arrangement. The modeling of the viscoelastic response in terms of physically interpretable parameters is conducted using a multiscale approach consisting of two steps: modeling of the single filament response of F-actin by a worm-like chain model including the extensibility of the filament, and assembling the three-dimensional biopolymer network by using the microsphere model which accounts for filaments equally distributed in space. The viscoelastic effects of the network are taken into account using a generalized Maxwell model. The Cauchy stress and elasticity tensors are obtained within a continuum mechanics framework and implemented into a finite-element program. The model is validated on the network level using large strain experiments on reconstituted actin gels. Comparisons of the proposed model with rheological experiments recover reasonable values for the material parameters. Finite-element simulations of the indentation of a sphere on a network slab and the aspiration of a droplet in a micropipette allow for further insights of the viscoelastic behavior of actin networks.

[1]  R. Ogden,et al.  On the Bending and Stretching Elasticity of Biopolymer Filaments , 2011 .

[2]  W. R. Jones,et al.  Alterations in the Young's modulus and volumetric properties of chondrocytes isolated from normal and osteoarthritic human cartilage. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  A. Bausch,et al.  Structural and viscoelastic properties of actin/filamin networks: cross-linked versus bundled networks. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[4]  J. Spudich,et al.  The regulation of rabbit skeletal muscle contraction. I. Biochemical studies of the interaction of the tropomyosin-troponin complex with actin and the proteolytic fragments of myosin. , 1971, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[5]  P. Janmey,et al.  Elasticity of semiflexible biopolymer networks. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[6]  P. Flory,et al.  STATISTICAL MECHANICS OF CROSS-LINKED POLYMER NETWORKS II. SWELLING , 1943 .

[7]  Jonathan Stricker,et al.  Mechanics of the F-actin cytoskeleton. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  W. Kraus,et al.  Endothelial, cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle exhibit different viscous and elastic properties as determined by atomic force microscopy. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Millard F. Beatty,et al.  An Average-Stretch Full-Network Model for Rubber Elasticity , 2003 .

[10]  Mary C Boyce,et al.  Constitutive modeling of the stress-strain behavior of F-actin filament networks. , 2008, Acta biomaterialia.

[11]  M. Boyce,et al.  A three-dimensional constitutive model for the large stretch behavior of rubber elastic materials , 1993 .

[12]  Gerald H Pollack,et al.  Mechanics of F-actin characterized with microfabricated cantilevers. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[13]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  Large Deformation Finite Element Analysis of Micropipette Aspiration to Determine the Mechanical Properties of the Chondrocyte , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  R. Ogden,et al.  Elasticity of biopolymer filaments. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[15]  Ning Wang,et al.  Do biophysical properties of the airway smooth muscle in culture predict airway hyperresponsiveness? , 2006, American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology.

[16]  Marc Herant,et al.  The mechanics of neutrophils: synthetic modeling of three experiments. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[17]  G. Holzapfel,et al.  A new approach to model cross-linked actin networks: multi-scale continuum formulation and computational analysis. , 2013, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[18]  Stretching Semiflexible Filaments and Their Networks , 2009 .

[19]  Pablo Fernández,et al.  A master relation defines the nonlinear viscoelasticity of single fibroblasts. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[20]  D. Wirtz,et al.  Strain Hardening of Actin Filament Networks , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  Hubert M. James,et al.  Theory of the Elastic Properties of Rubber , 1943 .

[22]  F Guilak,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of chondrocytes from normal and osteoarthritic human cartilage , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[23]  S. Quek,et al.  Power-law rheology analysis of cells undergoing micropipette aspiration , 2010, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[24]  T. Pollard,et al.  Identification of a factor in conventional muscle actin preparations which inhibits actin filament self-association. , 1980, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[25]  R. Hochmuth,et al.  Micropipette aspiration of living cells. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Tracer studies on f-actin fluctuations. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[27]  P. Nelson,et al.  Theory of high-force DNA stretching and overstretching. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[28]  Internal motility in stiffening actin-myosin networks. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[29]  J. Yvonnet,et al.  Analyzing the interplay between single cell rheology and force generation through large deformation finite element models , 2011, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[30]  W. Wall,et al.  Structural polymorphism in heterogeneous cytoskeletal networks , 2009 .

[31]  P. Onck,et al.  Models for stiffening in cross-linked biopolymer networks: A comparative study , 2008 .

[32]  Toshiro Ohashi,et al.  Remodeling of vascular endothelial cells exposed to fluid shear stress: experimental and numerical approach , 2005 .

[33]  Wolfgang A Wall,et al.  Finite-element approach to Brownian dynamics of polymers. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[34]  S. Joshi,et al.  Stochastic rate-dependent elasticity and failure of soft fibrous networks , 2012 .

[35]  Gerhard A. Holzapfel,et al.  A viscoelastic model for fiber-reinforced composites at finite strains: Continuum basis, computational aspects and applications , 2001 .

[36]  P. Janmey,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels , 2004, Nature.

[37]  D. Boal,et al.  Simulations of the erythrocyte cytoskeleton at large deformation. II. Micropipette aspiration. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[38]  Oliver Lieleg,et al.  Structure and dynamics of cross-linked actin networks , 2010 .

[39]  P. Bazant,et al.  Efficient Numerical Integration on the Surface of a Sphere , 1986 .

[40]  A. Bausch,et al.  Cytoskeletal polymer networks: viscoelastic properties are determined by the microscopic interaction potential of cross-links. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[41]  E. Siggia,et al.  Entropic elasticity of lambda-phage DNA. , 1994, Science.

[42]  P. Onck,et al.  Three-dimensional cross-linked F-actin networks: relation between network architecture and mechanical behavior. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[43]  F. John,et al.  Stretching DNA , 2022 .

[44]  A. R. Payne The Dynamic Properties of Carbon Black-Loaded Natural Rubber Vulcanizates. Part I , 1962 .

[45]  Roger D. Kamm,et al.  Computational Analysis of Viscoelastic Properties of Crosslinked Actin Networks , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[46]  Sebastian Rammensee,et al.  Negative normal stress in semiflexible biopolymer gels. , 2007, Nature materials.

[47]  C. Ross Ethier,et al.  Young’s modulus of elasticity of Schlemm’s canal endothelial cells , 2010, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[48]  Gerhard A. Holzapfel,et al.  Nonlinear Solid Mechanics: A Continuum Approach for Engineering Science , 2000 .

[49]  A. Bausch,et al.  Nonlinear mechanics of entangled F-actin solutions. , 2008, Soft matter.

[50]  A. Bausch,et al.  Cyclic hardening in bundled actin networks. , 2010, Nature communications.

[51]  E. Giessen,et al.  On Improved Network Models for Rubber Elasticity and Their Applications to Orientation Hardening in Glassy Polymers , 1993 .

[52]  Oliver Lieleg,et al.  Micro- and macrorheological properties of isotropically cross-linked actin networks. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[53]  A. Bausch,et al.  Viscoelasticity of isotropically cross-linked actin networks. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[54]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  Nonuniversality of elastic exponents in random bond-bending networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[55]  A. Bausch,et al.  Cross-linker unbinding and self-similarity in bundled cytoskeletal networks. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[56]  D A Weitz,et al.  Relating microstructure to rheology of a bundled and cross-linked F-actin network in vitro. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  A. Hosoi,et al.  New measures for characterizing nonlinear viscoelasticity in large amplitude oscillatory shear , 2008 .

[58]  David C. Morse,et al.  Viscoelasticity of Concentrated Isotropic Solutions of Semiflexible Polymers. 1. Model and Stress Tensor , 1998 .

[59]  C. Lim,et al.  Biomechanics approaches to studying human diseases. , 2007, Trends in biotechnology.

[60]  T. Odijk Stiff chains and filaments under tension , 1995 .

[61]  Serdar Göktepe,et al.  A micro–macro approach to rubber-like materials. Part II: The micro-sphere model of finite rubber viscoelasticity , 2005 .

[62]  Stefan Schinkinger,et al.  Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[63]  G. Nash,et al.  Abnormalities in the mechanical properties of red blood cells caused by Plasmodium falciparum. , 1989, Blood.

[64]  Mykola Tkachuk,et al.  The maximal advance path constraint for the homogenization of materials with random network microstructure , 2012 .

[65]  Serdar Göktepe,et al.  A micro-macro approach to rubber-like materials—Part I: the non-affine micro-sphere model of rubber elasticity , 2004 .

[66]  F C MacKintosh,et al.  Distinct regimes of elastic response and deformation modes of cross-linked cytoskeletal and semiflexible polymer networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[67]  C. Broedersz,et al.  Measurement of nonlinear rheology of cross-linked biopolymer gels , 2010 .

[68]  Subra Suresh,et al.  Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.