Agar gel immunodiffusion test for the detection of bovine leukemia virus antibodies: lack of trans-Atlantic standardization.

Two agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) kits for the serodiagnosis of bovine leukemia virus (BLV) were imported from Europe and were compared with North American kits. The BLV AGID kits from North America and from Europe differed significantly. The punches were different, as were the pattern distribution in the agar of the reference and the test sera, resulting in differences in the reading of the immunoprecipitation lines. Based on the testing of 1200 serum samples from cattle, the European kits gave a good correlation with the American kits, as indicated by their respective kappa values. However, the European kits were found to be less sensitive when evaluated against weakly positive samples from field specimens or following a dilution trial. Only 65% and 50% of the weakly positive samples detected by the American kit #1 were detected by the European kits #2 and #3, respectively. The American kit was also capable of detecting BLV antibodies in 45% of strongly positive samples diluted 1/50 in negative sera, while antibodies were detected in only 15% of the samples with the European kit #2 and in none of the samples with the European kit #3. False negatives were also detected with the European kits. Among the false negatives, the degree of expected reactions was weak (European kit #2) or of varying degrees of positivity (European kit #3). Besides the differences in format and performance, the BLV-AGID kits in Europe are evaluated with the National Standard Serum E4 while a proficiency panel composed of a quadruplicate set of 10 reference sera is used in Canada to monitor the kits. Based on the overall observations, we noted a lack of standardization between the BLV-AGID kits used in North America and in Europe.

[1]  K. Pelzer Economics of bovine leukemia virus infection. , 1997, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[2]  J. Kaneene,et al.  BOVINE LEUKEMIA VIRUS AND ENZOOTIC BOVINE LEUKOSIS , 1992 .

[3]  R. Hoff-Jørgensen An international comparison of different laboratory tests for the diagnosis of bovine leukosis: suggestions for international standardization. , 1989, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[4]  J. Evermann,et al.  Bovine leukosis virus: understanding viral transmission and the methods of control , 1987 .

[5]  R. Meiron,et al.  Humoral and cellular responses in calves experimentally infected with bovine leukemia virus (BLV). , 1985, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[6]  R. Kettmann,et al.  Bovine leukemia virus. , 2007, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[7]  J. Miller,et al.  Fall in antibody titer to bovine leukemia virus in the periparturient period. , 1982, Canadian journal of comparative medicine : Revue canadienne de medecine comparee.

[8]  B. Samagh,et al.  Seroepidemiological Survey of Bovine Leukaemia Virus Infection in Canadian Cattle , 1981 .

[9]  J. Stephenson,et al.  Evaluation of radioimmunoprecipitation for the detection of bovine leukemia virus infection in domestic cattle. , 1977, Journal of immunology.

[10]  M. Onuma,et al.  An ether-sensitive antigen associated with bovine leukemia virus infection. , 1975, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  J. Miller,et al.  Precipitating antibody to an internal antigen of the C-type virus associated with bovine lymphosarcoma. , 1972, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.