Supervised control of buck-boost converters for aeronautical applications

Recent MEA (More Electric Aircraft) concepts require new approaches to design and management of the electric system onboard. Bidirectional Buck-Boost Converter Units (BBCUs) used like bridges between power buses with different voltage require intelligent supervisory control for autonomous selection of operating modes. In this paper at low-level, sliding manifold-based strategies are employed to track desired current references, or to recover from overload within a prescribed time. At a higher level, three working modes are defined, (Buck-, Boost- and Intermediate-Mode), and scheduled by a high-level supervisory strategy. Stability proofs of the overall strategy require estimates of the Region of Attraction (ROA) for each controller, that are discussed in the paper. A typical aeronautic scenario is presented, with standard operating conditions followed by two types of overloads (the second more severe than the first) and finally a return to standard condition. Detailed numerical simulations show the effectiveness of the proposed novel control strategy in terms of stability and performance of the smart converter.

[1]  H. El Fadil,et al.  Backstepping Based Control of PWM DC-DC Boost Power Converters , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics.

[2]  Romeo Ortega,et al.  Passivity-based controllers for the stabilization of Dc-to-Dc Power converters , 1997, Autom..

[3]  F. L. Luo,et al.  Sliding-mode control for dc-dc converters with constant switching frequency , 2006 .

[4]  Amir G. Aghdam,et al.  Supervisory control of switching control systems , 2006, CDC.

[5]  Arie Levant,et al.  Universal single-input-single-output (SISO) sliding-mode controllers with finite-time convergence , 2001, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[6]  A. Cavallo,et al.  Supervisory control of DC‐DC bidirectional converter for advanced aeronautic applications , 2018 .

[7]  Beniamino Guida,et al.  Rate-limiter control comparison for energy storage systems in aerospace applications , 2016 .

[8]  Beniamino Guida,et al.  Smart Buck-Boost Converter Unit operations for aeronautical applications , 2015, 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[9]  Chok-You Chan,et al.  Simplified parallel-damped passivity-based controllers for dc-dc power converters , 2008, Autom..

[10]  P.J. Antsaklis,et al.  Supervisory control of hybrid systems , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  Yong Kang,et al.  The Variable-Bandwidth Hysteresis-Modulation Sliding-Mode Control for the PWM–PFM Converters , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[12]  A. Levant Robust exact differentiation via sliding mode technique , 1998 .

[13]  F. Hoppensteadt Singular perturbations on the infinite interval , 1966 .

[14]  E. Davies,et al.  Electrical machines , 2006, 2006 Eleventh International Middle East Power Systems Conference.

[15]  Hebertt Sira-Ramírez,et al.  Control Design Techniques in Power Electronics Devices , 2006 .

[16]  Federico Milano,et al.  Algorithmic Construction of Lyapunov Functions for Power System Stability Analysis , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[17]  Hassan K. Khalil,et al.  Nonlinear Systems Third Edition , 2008 .

[18]  R. Giral,et al.  Why is sliding mode control methodology needed for power converters? , 2010, Proceedings of 14th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference EPE-PEMC 2010.

[19]  Alberto Cavallo,et al.  Output feedback control based on a high-order sliding manifold approach , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[20]  Beniamino Guida,et al.  Sliding mode control for DC/DC converters , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[21]  Beniamino Guida,et al.  A Petri net application for energy management in aeronautical networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE 18th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA).

[22]  Paolo Nistri,et al.  Robust control design with integral action and limited rate control , 1999, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..