Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018

From the *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, ** Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospitial, University of California, San Francisco; *** Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, **** University of Iowa Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Iowa City, ***** Department of Orthopaedic Surgery; University of Louisville School of Medicine Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest. Material presented in this Compendium is based on the Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones by M.E. Müller, J. Nazarian, P. Koch and J. Schatzker, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990. The Orthopaedic Trauma Association is indebted to Professor Maurice Müller for allowing use of the system. Correspondence: James F. Kellam, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 6.146, Houston Texas, 77030 (e-mail: James.F.Kellam@uth.tmc.edu) Copyright © 2017 by AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland; Orthopaedic Trauma Association, IL, US To encourage the use of this classification and this fracture classification compendium, the figures may be reproduced and the classification may be used for research, educational and or medical purposes without the need to request permission from the OTA, AO Foundation or the publisher. It cannot be used commercially or for-profit without permission. Foreword

[1]  J. Chapman,et al.  The AOSpine Sacral Fracture Classification , 2016 .

[2]  B. Aarabi,et al.  The surgical algorithm for the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system , 2016, European Spine Journal.

[3]  F. Haddad,et al.  The Unified Classification System (UCS): improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures. , 2014, The bone & joint journal.

[4]  L. Audigé,et al.  The AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) scapula fracture classification system: focus on body involvement. , 2013, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[5]  C. Luo,et al.  Three-Column Fixation for Complex Tibial Plateau Fractures , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[6]  Michael L. Brennan,et al.  Intramedullary Fixation of Fibular Fractures Associated With Pilon Fractures , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[7]  M. Patzakis,et al.  A New Classification Scheme for Open Fractures , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[8]  L. Audigé,et al.  The AO Comprehensive Classification of Pediatric Long-bone Fractures: A Web-Based Multicenter Agreement Study , 2007, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[9]  L. Audigé,et al.  Documentation of fracture severity with the AO classification of pediatric long-bone fractures , 2007, Acta orthopaedica.

[10]  D. Dirschl,et al.  Interobserver Reliability of a CT-Based Fracture Classification System , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[11]  M. Bhandari,et al.  A Concept for the Validation of Fracture Classifications , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[12]  Laurent Audigé,et al.  How reliable are reliability studies of fracture classifications?A systematic review of their methodologies , 2004, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[13]  C. Blundell,et al.  AO or Schatzker? How reliable is classification of tibial plateau fractures? , 2003, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[14]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Improving reliability in the classification of fractures of the acetabulum , 2003, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[15]  J. Kingma,et al.  Interrater Reliability for the Basic Categories of the Ao/Asif's System as a Frame of Reference for Classifying Distal Radial Fractures , 2001, Perceptual and motor skills.

[16]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures , 2001, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[17]  T. Flinkkilä,et al.  Poor interobserver reliability of AO classification of fractures of the distal radius: Additional computed tomography is of minor value , 1998 .

[18]  E. Pääkkö,et al.  Poor interobserver reliability of AO classification of fractures of the distal radius. Additional computed tomography is of minor value. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  D. Dirschl,et al.  A critical assessment of factors influencing reliability in the classification of fractures, using fractures of the tibial plafond as a model. , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[20]  J. Marsh,et al.  Assessment of the AO/ASIF fracture classification for the distal tibia. , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[21]  M. Swiontkowski,et al.  Interobserver variation in the AO/OTA fracture classification system for pilon fractures: is there a problem? , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[22]  Martin Js,et al.  Current classification of fractures. Rationale and utility. , 1997 .

[23]  J. L. Marsh,et al.  CURRENT CLASSIFICATION OF FRACTURES , 1997, Radiologic Clinics of North America.

[24]  Gerald R. Williams,et al.  Evaluation of the Neer System of Classification of Proximal Humeral Fractures with Computerized Tomographic Scans and Plain Radiographs* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  M. Swiontkowski,et al.  Consistency of AO fracture classification for the distal radius. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[26]  C. Steyers,et al.  Classification of distal radius fractures: an analysis of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility. , 1996, The Journal of hand surgery.

[27]  R. Brumback,et al.  Interobserver agreement in the classification of open fractures of the tibia. The results of a survey of two hundred and forty-five orthopaedic surgeons. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  C. Gerber,et al.  The reproducibility of classification of fractures of the proximal end of the humerus. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  J. Zuckerman,et al.  The Neer classification system for proximal humeral fractures. An assessment of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  Maurice E. Muller,et al.  The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones , 1990 .

[31]  B. Kristiansen,et al.  The Neer classification of fractures of the proximal humerus , 1988, Skeletal Radiology.

[32]  C. Rich,et al.  Tibial plateau fractures. , 1987, Orthopedics.

[33]  L. Audigé,et al.  The AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) scapula fracture classification system: focus on glenoid fossa involvement. , 2013, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[34]  R. Chesnut,et al.  Reliability and reproducibility of dens fracture classification with use of plain radiography and reformatted computer-aided tomography. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[35]  E. Flatow,et al.  Reliability and reproducibility of radiographs of greater tuberosity displacement. A cadaveric study. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[36]  J. Marsh,et al.  Current classification of fractures. Rationale and utility. , 1997, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[37]  P. D. M. E. Müller,et al.  The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones , 1990, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[38]  Serge Nazarian,et al.  Classification AO des fractures , 1987 .

[39]  R. McBroom,et al.  The tibial plateau fracture. The Toronto experience 1968--1975. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.