How socially connected are citers to those that they cite?

– The purpose of this paper is to report an investigation into the social and citation networks of three information scientists: David Nicholas, Peter Williams and Paul Huntington., – Similarities between citation patterns and social closeness were identified and discussed. A total of 16 individuals in the citation network were identified and investigated using citation analysis, and a matrix formed of citations made between those in the network. Social connections between the 16 in the citation network were then investigated by means of a questionnaire, the results of which were merged into a separate matrix. These matrices were converted into visual social networks, using multidimensional scaling. A new deviance measure was devised for drawing comparisons between social and citation closeness in individual cases., – Nicholas, Williams and Huntington were found to have cited 527 authors in the period 2000‐2003, the 16 most cited becoming the subjects of further citation and social investigation. This comparison, along with the examination of visual representations indicates a positive correlation between social closeness and citation counts. Possible explanations for this correlation are discussed, and implications considered. Despite this correlation, the information scientists were found to cite widely outside their immediate social connections., – Social network analysis has not been often used in combination with citation analysis to explore inter‐relationships in research teams.

[1]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited , 1978, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[2]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[3]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[4]  Yan Wang,et al.  Scientific collaboration in China as reflected in co-authorship , 2005, Scientometrics.

[5]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Author productivity and geodesic distance in bibliographic co-authorship networks, and visibility on the Web , 2004, Scientometrics.

[7]  Ronald N. Kostoff,et al.  The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation , 1998, Scientometrics.

[8]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Patterns of author cocitation in information policy: Evidence of social, collaborative and cognitive structure , 1999, Scientometrics.

[9]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  Citation indexing - its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities , 1979 .

[10]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited. Part II., The 1953 Watson and Crick article on the structure of DNA , 2004, Scientometrics.

[11]  Julian Warner,et al.  A critical review of the application of citation studies to the Research Assessment Exercises , 2000, J. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Linda F. Crowell.  Weak ties: a mechanism for helping women expand their social networks and increase their capital , 2004 .

[13]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology , 1997, J. Documentation.

[14]  M. Newman.  Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  D. Price,et al.  Little Science, Big Science and Beyond , 1986 .

[16]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  The sources used by bibliometrics-scientometrics as reflected in references , 2002, Scientometrics.

[17]  WellmanBarry,et al.  Does citation reflect social structure , 2004 .

[18]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Citation counts and the Research Assessment Exercise V: Archaeology and the 2001 RAE , 2003, J. Documentation.

[19]  Henry Small.  Visualizing science by citation mapping , 1999 .

[20]  Patrick Doreian,et al.  A revised measure of standing of journals in stratified networks , 2005, Scientometrics.

[21]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Does citation reflect social structure?: Longitudinal evidence from the Globenet interdisciplinary research group , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  Yong Fang,et al.  Lattices in citation networks: An investigation into the structure of citation graphs , 2001, Scientometrics.

[23]  Michael H. MacRoberts,et al.  Problems of citation analysis , 1996, Scientometrics.

[24]  Torsten Hägerstrand,et al.  Innovation Diffusion As a Spatial Process , 1967 .

[25]  John Peters,et al.  Quality Indicators in Academic Publishing , 1994 .

[26]  Paula Mählck,et al.  Socio-Bibliometric Mapping of Intra-Departmental Networks , 2000, Scientometrics.

[27]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and a characterization of lattice citation networks , 2002, Scientometrics.

[28]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Studies in scientific collaboration , 1978, Scientometrics.

[29]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Seismology as a dynamic, distributed area of scientific research , 2003, Scientometrics.

[30]  A. Maryanski,et al.  African ape social structure: Is there strength in weak ties? , 1987 .

[31]  Henry M. Kim,et al.  Relationships among the academic business disciplines: a multi-method citation analysis , 2006 .

[32]  Noriko Hara,et al.  An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[34]  A. Michaelson.  The development of a scientific specialty as diffusion through social relations: the case of role analysis , 1993 .

[35]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences , 2002, J. Inf. Sci..

[36]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Clusters and Maps of Science Journals Based on Bi-connected Graphs in the Journal Citation Reports , 2009, ArXiv.

[37]  Mark Buchanan.  Small World : Uncovering Nature's Hidden Networks , 2002 .

[38]  Diane M. Phillips,et al.  A social network analysis of business logistics and transportation , 1998 .

[39]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Do citations matter? , 1994, J. Inf. Sci..

[40]  Lehtinen Erno,et al.  Exploring invisible scientific communities: Studying networking relations within an educational research community. A Finnish case , 2001 .

[41]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Self-linking and self-linked rates of academic institutions on the Web , 2004, Scientometrics.

[42]  Debora Shaw,et al.  Identity-creators and image-makers: Using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place , 2002, Scientometrics.

[43]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Studies in scientific collaboration , 2005, Scientometrics.

[44]  Scott L. Feld.  Network analysis using the method of path lists: testing the weak ties hypothesis , 1997 .

[45]  T. Opthof,et al.  Sense and nonsense about the impact factor. , 1997, Cardiovascular research.

[46]  Daryl E. Chubin,et al.  Content Analysis of References: Adjunct or Alternative to Citation Counting? , 1975 .